Lateral Exchange Markets: How Social Platforms Operate in a Networked Economy
Open accessAbstract
Lateral exchange markets (LEMs) are sites of technologically intermediated exchange between actors occupying equivalent network positions. To develop an enriched understanding of these markets, the authors develop a more broad-based and differentiated understanding of peer-to-peer, sharing, and access-based markets. They focus on two key axes: the extent of (1) consociality and (2) platform intermediation. Drawing on these attributes, the authors theoretically deduce four ideal types—Forums, Enablers, Matchmakers, and Hubs. Each type provides value in a different way: Forums connect actors, Enablers equip actors, Matchmakers pair actors, and Hubs centralize exchange. Twenty organizational cases reveal insights into the failure, adaptation, and success of LEMs. Lateral exchange markets shift responsibility for personal and exchange security to relevant personal actors, to institutions, or to the governing algorithms of technology platforms. Extending the general proposition that sociality increasingly infuses market logics, the findings suggest a new frontier in which social resources and software platform algorithms interact as operand resources whose negative consequences (e.g., opportunism) require careful management through assurances and institutional arrangements matched to the type of LEM operation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 28 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
Bardhi and Eckhardt's conclusions about Zipcar should not be applied generally to all types of access-based consumption or all varieties of LEMs, but only to Hubs.
“Our findings demonstrate how Bardhi and Eckhardt's (2012) important conclusions about Zipcar should not be applied generally to all types of “accessbased consumption” or to all varieties of LEMs, but only to Hubs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bardhi and Eckhardt's (2012) source
- Interpretationown data
The quadripartite typology reveals limitations in prior research that generalized findings from just one LEM type, such as access-based consumption or collaborative consumption, to all types.
“First, our quadripartite typology reveals limitations in prior research that generalized findings from just one LEM type, such as access-based consumption (Bardhi and Eckahrdt 2012) or collaborative consumption (Benoit et al. 2017), to all types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bardhi and Eckahrdt 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Benoit et al. 2017 source
- Findingreasoning
Crossing extent of platform intermediation with extent of consociality yields four distinct market configurations for lateral exchange: Forums, Enablers, Matchmakers, and Hubs.
“Crossing extent of platform intermediation with extent of consociality yields four distinct market configurations for lateral exchange: Forums, Enablers, Matchmakers, and Hubs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The form of the LEM has the effect, intended or not, of variously constricting or facilitating consociality between network actors.
“Second, the form of the LEM has the effect-intended or not-of variously constricting or facilitating consociality between network actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Forums lower the search costs that actors incur when trying to find each other in a broad and disorganized market.
“This example shows that forums lower the search costs that actors incur when trying to find each other in a broad and disorganized market.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
Hubs lower search, decision, and surveillance costs as well as enforcement costs that arise from ensuring that actors meet performance expectations.
“Hubs such as Lending Club lower search, decision, and surveillance costs as well as the enforcement costs that arise from ensuring that actors meet performance expectations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LEMs are distinguished by the implementation of platform intermediation.
“Our analysis of 193 LEM companies reveals two structural patterns.First, LEMs are distinguished by the implementation of platform intermediation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Matchmakers lower the surveillance costs that usually result from monitoring other actors.
“In addition to lowering search and decision costs, Matchmakers such as DogVacay lower the surveillance costs that usually result from monitoring other actors (e.g., by requiring daily photo updates).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Forum social experiences are often characterized by offline in-person meetings, such as picking up goods from someone's home or riding in someone's car.
“The social experiences in this platform type are often characterized by offline in-person meetings (e.g., picking up goods from someone's home, riding in someone's car).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All LEM companies intermediate exchanges using a software-based technology platform.
“All LEM companies intermediate exchanges using a software-based technology platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There are differences in the extent to which the technology platform, rather than the exchange partners, is involved in the exchange process.
“There are, however, differences in the extent to which the technology platform, rather than the exchange partners, is involved in the exchange process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The LEM form inspires different governance mechanisms that use training, verification, ratings, watchdogs, insurance, and legal mechanisms such as guarantees and warranties to manage transaction trust.
“Our findings illustrate how the LEM form inspires different governance mechanisms that use training, verification, ratings, watchdogs, insurance, and legal mechanisms such as guarantees and warranties to manage transaction trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In multiple cases, including Craigslist and Skillshare, sociality and copresence introduce a degree of unpredictability that can have positive as well as negative outcomes.
“In multiple cases, including Craigslist and Skillshare, we observe how sociality and copresence introduce a degree of unpredictability that can have positive as well as negative outcomes (e.g., the marriages of people who met through Lyft, the murders of people who met their killer through Craigslist).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Lending Club's use of software algorithms to assess lender and borrower worthiness is built into its platform.
“Lending Club's use of software algorithms to assess lender and borrower worthiness is built into its platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Institutional and legal arrangements play supporting roles in LEM governance.
“Either type of governance can be managed successfully, and our analysis of a variety of examples suggests not only that institutional and legal arrangements play supporting roles but also that there are many profitable ways to combine them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Craigslist added watchdogs to its forums to manage the unintended consequence of lack of control.
“To manage this unintended consequence, Craigslist added watchdogs to its forums.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Other forms of LEM find market success with a different combination of platform and social assurance.
“Other forms of LEM find market success with a different combination of platform and social assurance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The four LEM types have two underlying trust-related dimensions: the extent of consociality between actors and the extent of intermediation of the platform.
“The types have two underlying trust-related dimensions: the extent of consociality between actors and the extent of intermediation of the platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our findings reveal many opportunities for companies to use the power of their platform to be opportunistic.
“Although our research focused on the threat of opportunism from network actors who could meet and then transact outside the platform's ability to monetize the exchange, our findings reveal many opportunities for companies to use the power of their platform to be opportunistic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
thredUP's Concierge service transformed the firm into a Hub configuration whose institutional norms were isomorphic with other large online clothing retailers.
“Its “Concierge” service transformed the firm into a Hub configuration whose institutional norms were isomorphic (Scott 1995) with other large online clothing retailers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scott 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
With low consociality and low platform intermediation, gaining actors' trust can be problematic for Enablers.
“With low consociality and low platform intermediation, gaining actors' trust can be problematic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Lateral exchange markets facilitate different kinds of social relationships.
“Lateral exchange markets facilitate different kinds of social relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With stronger platform intermediation and better management of the risks of copresence, Zimride by Enterprise became a viable LEM business.
“With stronger platform intermediation and better management of the risks of copresence, Zimride by Enterprise became a viable LEM business.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The core value proposition of a Hub LEM is to centralize and standardize service flows.
“Thus, the core value proposition of a Hub LEM is to centralize and standardize service flows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Lucky Girl campaign illustrates how network actors take full advantage of the platform's interface to create social identification within the Enabler's less interactive format, using personal values and identity cues to spur alternative forms of connection.
“The Lucky Girl campaign illustrates how network actors take full advantage of the platform's interface to create a social identification within the Enabler's less interactive format.”
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
“Those asking for creative funding will use their personal values and identity cues (such as being a talented artist and struggling mother) to create a sense of identification and spur alternative forms of connection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
The core value proposition of a Forum LEM is to connect actors.
“Consequently, the core value proposition of a Forum LEM is to connect actors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because Forum exchanges are unmediated by the LEM company and its platform, trust is rooted in interpersonal social exchange, which includes virtual communication.
“Because Forum exchanges are unmediated by the LEM company and its platform, trust is rooted in interpersonal social exchange, which includes virtual communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Peer-to-peer markets often include professional sellers and buyers.
“For example, a 2014 report based on New York City records revealed that professional property owners and managers made 37% of all revenue on Airbnb (New York State Office of the Attorney General 2014).In a study of its drivers, Uber found that 18% of them were professionals who previously or concurrently drove taxis or limousines (Uber Newsroom 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites New York State Office of the Attorney General 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Uber Newsroom 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The core value proposition of an Enabler LEM is to equip actors for service provision.
“As a result, the core value proposition of an Enabler LEM is to equip actors for service provision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
By providing a commercial service with strong social interaction whose exchange elements are technologically intermediated, TaskRabbit ameliorates some drawbacks of social exchanges, such as the burdensome norms of reciprocation.
“By providing a commercial service with strong social interaction whose exchange elements are technologically intermediated, TaskRabbit ameliorates some of the drawbacks of social exchanges, such as the burdensome norms of reciprocation (Marcoux 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marcoux 2009 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The quadripartite model of LEMs demonstrates how consociality interacts with and can be replaced or titrated by various forms of platform intermediation.
“It demonstrates how consociality interacts with and can be replaced or titrated by various forms of platform intermediation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model reveals how platform intermediation and extent of consociality are applied in discernible patterns across and within LEM types to create value and solve trust-related problems such as opportunism.
“Second, it reveals how platform intermediation and extent of consociality are applied in discernible patterns across and within LEM types to create value and solve trust-related problems such as opportunism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
When the need for trust is especially high, it is generally met with a higher level of platform intermediation, with higher levels of sociality, or with additional institutional attempts to build legitimacy.
“When the need for trust is especially high (as with a personal meeting or a significant financial transaction), it is generally met with a higher level of platform intermediation (as with thredUP), with higher levels of sociality (as with Quirky), or with additional institutional attempts to build legitimacy (as with TaskRabbit).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The combination of virtual and physical copresence, along with its possibilities for communication and negotiation, allows transaction actors to establish trust and to work out a successful exchange.
“The combination of virtual and physical copresence, along with its possibilities for communication and negotiation, allow transaction actors to establish trust and to work out a successful exchange.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
TaskRabbit combines normative enforcement mechanisms with strong platform intermediation to manage actors' ability to negotiate side deals in person or plan future transactions that would sidestep the platform.
“TaskRabbit combines these normative enforcement mechanisms with its strong platform intermediation in order to manage actors' ability to negotiate side deals in person or plan future transactions that would sidestep the platform altogether.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Either type of governance can be managed successfully.
“Either type of governance can be managed successfully, and our analysis of a variety of examples suggests not only that institutional and legal arrangements play supporting roles but also that there are many profitable ways to combine them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Those algorithms, along with the Lending Club brand and platform, serve as the basis for lenders' trust.
“Those algorithms, along with the Lending Club brand and platform, serve as the basis for lenders' trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Successful LEMs with low platform intermediation, such as Craigslist, shift the responsibility for personal and exchange security to lateral actors.
“For example, successful LEMs with low platform intermediation, such as Craigslist, shift the responsibility for personal and exchange security to lateral actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Craigslist's lack of control over scams, suspicious posts, and potentially dangerous social interactions is not due to a failing of Craigslist itself but is an unfortunate side effect of the type of LEM Craigslist represents.
“This lack of control is not due to some failing of Craigslist itself but, as our model suggests, an unfortunate side effect of the type of LEM they represent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There are many profitable ways to combine institutional and legal arrangements with other governance mechanisms in LEMs.
“Either type of governance can be managed successfully, and our analysis of a variety of examples suggests not only that institutional and legal arrangements play supporting roles but also that there are many profitable ways to combine them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Governance is anchored by the interpersonal confidence conferred by consociality on one end, and the technological assurances of platform intermediation on the other.
“Governance is anchored by the interpersonal confidence conferred by consociality on one end, and the technological assurances of platform intermediation on the other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
LEM platforms affect value creation by enabling, directing, and constraining social and economic interactions.
“In summary, LEM platforms affect value creation by enabling, directing, and constraining social and economic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Uber's scandals and Homejoy's problems are not atypical issues for LEMs.
“Uber's scandals (Newcomer 2017) and Homejoy's problems are not atypical issues for LEMs, whose new forms are transforming the world of business but must build legitimacy and trust to achieve success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newcomer 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 50
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior studies of peer-to-peer markets have focused only on particular manifestations such as access-based consumption or collaborative consumption, leaving little knowledge about the breadth and diversity of the general phenomenon or how generalizable conclusions from one type of consumption are to other types.
“Because only particular manifestations of these markets, such as those involving access-based consumption or collaborative consumption, have been studied, we still know very little about the breadth and diversity of the general phenomenon or about how generalizable conclusions gained studying one type of consumption might apply to other types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBenoit et al.'s classification of Uber as a Matchmaker accords with the authors' typing of Uber as a Matchmaker, but the authors' findings contradict Benoit et al.'s generalization that the value for all platforms in all forms of collaborative consumption lies solely in matchmaking.
“Their classification accords perfectly with our typing of Uber as a Matchmaker.”
- Also stated in: § Revealing the Different Types of LEMs · plain
“Our findings contradict their generalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Benoit et al. 2017 source
- Also stated in: § Revealing the Different Types of LEMs · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAfter two years in business, thredUP as an Enabler had three major problems: the site needed additional monitoring because leaving quality and value assessments to sellers led to uneven offerings, trading entire boxes of used clothing was unwieldy, and the commission structure was unprofitable.
“First, the site needed additional monitoring-leaving quality and value assessments in the hands of sellers led to a very uneven offering.”
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
“Second, the requirement of trading entire boxes of used clothing was unwieldy.”
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
“Finally, the commission structure was proving to be unprofitable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMuch of the controversy surrounding Craigslist comes from unintended side effects of its consocial affordances, which actors have used to promote services such as prostitution and which have been linked to 101 murders.
“However, much of the controversy surrounding Craigslist comes from the unintended side effects of its consocial affordances, which actors have used to promote services such as prostitution and which have been linked to 101 murders (Dewey 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dewey 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMatchmakers mediate the service flow between providers and beneficiary actors and are characterized by high platform intermediation and high consociality.
“Matchmakers mediate the service flow between providers and beneficiary actors (actor ← LEM firm → actor) and are characterized by high platform intermediation as well as high levels of consociality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough LEMs provide opportunities for social behaviors, the enactment of those behaviors is optional and may not occur.
“Whatever the format, it is noteworthy that although the LEM provides opportunities for social behaviors, the enactment of those behaviors is optional and may not occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningForums are LEM configurations that facilitate the flow of services directly between actors, providing low platform intermediation and high consociality.
“Forums are LEM configurations that facilitate the flow of services directly between actors (actor ↔ actor), providing low platform intermediation and high consociality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRules of conduct on Craigslist are mostly implicit, and interview informants related numerous uncertainties about the norms governing exchange, which is typical for the Forum configuration.
“Rules of conduct are mostly implicit.”
- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
“In recounting their exchange experiences on Craigslist, our interview informants related numerous uncertainties about the norms governing the exchange”
- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
“However, this level of ambiguity is typical for the Forum configuration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationKickstarter is a successful and influential crowdfunding platform for creative projects, funding over 100,000 projects with more than $2 billion pledged, and its decentralized system provides a template that standardizes project promotion and educates creators through a Creative Handbook.
“This firm has been successful and influential, funding over 100,000 projects with more than $2 billion pledged (Kickstarter 2017).”
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
“However, Kickstarter's platform provides a template for project creations that standardizes the creative project's promotion.”
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
“Kickstarter offers a “Creative Handbook” as a guide to educate creators about the best practices to produce videos and create sponsor rewards as well as how to design, manage, and advertise their projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kickstarter 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Enabler Cases · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMitra and Gilbert's research suggests that skillful use of language is an important element on Kickstarter, with the use of socially charged phrases predicting significantly greater funding success.
“Although Kickstarter may be low in copresence, Mitra and Gilbert's (2014) research suggests that skillful use of language is an important element, with the use of socially charged phrases predicting significantly greater funding success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mitra and Gilbert's (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe Forum LEM type is distinguished from other LEM types by having the most social user experience, wherein individual actors organize many aspects of their exchange.
“The Forum LEM type is distinguished from the other types by having the most social user experience, wherein individual actors organize many aspects of their exchange.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCraigslist is a well-known bulletin board site that typifies the Forum LEM configuration and has been plagued by safety and trust concerns.
“Craigslist is a well-known bulletin board site that typifies the Forum LEM configuration.”
- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
“Craigslist is one of the longest-running LEMs, but it has been plagued by safety and trust concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEnablers lower search costs as well as decision costs, such as resources expended evaluating terms and assessing expected performance.
“Enablers such as Poshmark lower search costs as well as decision costs, such as resources expended evaluating terms and assessing expected performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEnablers are configured to help individual actors provide services to other actors, with relatively low platform intermediation and low consociality.
“Enablers are configured to help individual actors provide services to other actors (LEM firm → actor → actor).They have relatively low levels of platform intermediation (i.e., they minimize use of their technology platform to coordinate the transaction) and low levels of consociality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationCraigslist relies on high levels of consociality to mitigate trust concerns and encourages network actors to deal locally with people they can meet in person.
“Craigslist relies on high levels of consociality to mitigate trust concerns and encourages network actors to “deal locally with folks you can meet in person-follow this one rule and avoid 99% of scam attempts””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHubs act as the central point in the exchange, resulting in two discrete and bidirectional flows between platform provider and actors, combining high platform intermediation with low consociality.
“Hubs act as the central point in the exchange, resulting in two discrete and bidirectional flows between platform provider and actors (actor ↔ LEM firm ↔ actor).Combining high platform intermediation with low consociality, this configuration hides the service flow between equivalent actors behind its own platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMatchmakers combine technology and sociality in sophisticated ways, decrease search costs, simplify decisions, locate superior matches, and deploy platforms alongside institutional arrangements to intermediate exchanges.
“Matchmakers combine technology and sociality in sophisticated ways.”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“Their systems decrease search costs, simplify decisions, and locate matches that are superior to the ones actors could achieve on their own.”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“In addition, Matchmaker LEMs deploy platforms alongside institutional arrangements to intermediate exchanges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Hub is characterized by a uniform service experience similar to a conventional marketplace, integrates resources from different actors, serves as a central place to enact exchanges, and provides assurances against risk such as creating a marketplace, lowering search costs, offering product guarantees, monitoring actors, and ensuring exchanges transpire as planned.
“The Hub is characterized by a uniform service experience similar to that found in a conventional marketplace.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“As with retail consignment, Hubs integrate resources from different actors and serve as a central place to enact exchanges.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“Hubs provide network actors with many assurances against risk: they create a marketplace, lower search costs, offer product guarantees, monitor actors, and ensure that the exchange transpires as planned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTaskRabbit has raised $38 million in venture financing, employs 60 people, is available in 24 markets, and is not yet profitable.
“TaskRabbit has raised $38 million in venture financing, employs 60 people, is available in 24 markets, and “is not yet profitable” (Stangel 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stangel 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMany existing companies are entering LEMs as complementary businesses.
“In addition, many existing companies are entering LEMs as complementary businesses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenLateral exchange markets are technologically intermediated exchanges between the members of a network of buyers and sellers, not limited to access-based, sharing-based exchange or amateur peer activities, and not characterized by a monadic approach to exchange.
“Lateral exchange markets are not limited to the consumption of access-based, sharing-based exchange or the amateur-based activities of peers; nor are they characterized by a monadic approach to exchange.”
- Also stated in: § Understanding LEMs · plain
“These widespread and influential activities are technologically intermediated exchanges between the members of a network of buyers and sellers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Understanding LEMs · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationShedding its Matchmaker form and adopting the form of an Enabler, Skillshare transitioned to an online-only platform and successfully delivered online and video courses, attracting 75,000 new students in its first year online and later reaching 3 million enrollments from over 180 countries.
“Shedding its Matchmaker skin and adopting the form of an Enabler, Skillshare transitioned to an online-only platform and began successfully delivering online and video courses.”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“In its first year online, the company attracted 75,000 new students, who provided $1.5 million in compensation to its online teachers (Griffith 2013).”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“Three years later, the company had 40 full-time employees and boasted 3 million enrollments from over 180 countries (Noto 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Griffith 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Noto 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMany companies assure actors that they will not be paired again with other actors to whom they have given a low rating.
“Many companies assure actors that they will not be paired again with other actors to whom they have given a low rating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTaskRabbit exhibits high platform intermediation and deploys institutional assurances, yet pairs actors in a situation of copresence.
“Although exhibiting a high degree of platform intermediation and deploying institutional assurances, Matchmakers such as TaskRabbit pair actors in a situation of copresence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationUber's ostensibly legitimate heuristics allegedly cheated its drivers of millions of dollars through system programming that rounded fees to the nearest dollar in the company's favor.
“For example, Uber's ostensibly legitimate heuristics allegedly cheated its drivers of millions of dollars through system programming that rounded fees to the nearest dollar in the company's favor (Newcomer 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newcomer 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPrior studies have been limited in scope and unable to compare different types of markets, so understanding of the underlying characteristics and relative effectiveness of different forms of peer-to-peer markets is very limited.
“Third, because prior studies have been limited in scope, they have been unable to compare different types of markets.Thus, we have very limited understanding about the underlying characteristics and relative effectiveness of different forms of peer-to-peer markets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPersonal meetings for the purpose of exchange entail heightened personal risk.
“However, personal meetings for the purpose of exchange entail heightened personal risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAs intermediaries, LEM firms offer two potential benefits: they create the market and lower transaction costs.
“As intermediaries, LEM firms offer two potential benefits: they create the market and lower transaction costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDuring multiple rounds over six years, the authors returned to field sites to investigate, gather additional details, seek nuance, and find disconfirming evidence.
“During the multiple rounds of combined ethnographic data collection and analysis over the six years of the project, we returned to our field sites to investigate, gather additional details, seek nuance, and find disconfirming evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationEach LEM type represents a specific configuration of a service ecosystem.
“Each LEM type represents a specific configuration of a service ecosystem (Vargo, Wieland, and Akaka 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vargo, Wieland, and Akaka 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLateral exchange markets are a new form born of the potential of contemporary digital technology to coordinate and monetize networks.
“Lateral exchange markets are a new form born of the potential of contemporary digital technology to coordinate and monetize networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningZimride struggled for several years because it failed to operate coherently as an LEM Forum, having both high intermediation and low intermediation, fostering mistrust by offering copresence to the general public while failing to properly vet riders and drivers, and therefore could not sufficiently monetize its value-adding connections.
“Zimride struggled for several years because it failed to operate coherently as an LEM Forum.”
- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
“It had created an LEM company that had both high intermediation (payment processing and oversight) as well as low intermediation (cash payments and minimal oversight).”
- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
“As a result, the company could not sufficiently monetize the value-adding connections it enabled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Forum Cases · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe core value proposition of a Matchmaker LEM comes from providing a pairing of exchange actors.
“The core value proposition of a Matchmaker LEM comes from providing a pairing of exchange actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPlatform intermediation plays an important role in mitigating duplicity, incentivizing trustworthy behavior, and inspiring trust in the exchange.
“Platform intermediation therefore plays an important role in mitigating duplicity, incentivizing trustworthy behavior, and inspiring trust in the exchange.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: LEM buyers and sellers usually have no prior experience with one another.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors' procedure is in keeping with accepted principles of mainstream qualitative data analysis and interpretation.
“Our procedure is in keeping with accepted principles of mainstream qualitative data analysis and interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors systematically compared case data and emergent framework until the theoretical position was internally consistent and externally able to accommodate new entries and novel events.
“We systematically compared case data and emergent framework until our theoretical position was both internally consistent and externally able to accommodate both new entries to the industry and novel events occurring in a constantly changing empirical field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe technological elements of LEMs create new forms of social connection and experience and thus new types of social operant resources.
“The technological elements of LEMs, which bring people together to create value, also create new forms of social connection and experience and, thus, new types of social operant resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe two dimensions of platform intermediation and consociality effectively classify and explain the general principles behind LEMs.
“These two dimensions serve to effectively classify and explain the general principles behind LEMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationOnline netnographic activities followed the guidelines of Kozinets (2015) and were interrelated with the ethnography.
“Online netnographic activities followed the guidelines of Kozinets (2015) and were interrelated with the ethnography.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kozinets (2015) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe increasingly knowledge-based economy is leading to hybrid market forms that differ in fundamental ways from market forms of the past.
“Our approach builds on Adler's (2001) important insight that the increasingly knowledge-based economy is leading to hybrid market forms that differ in fundamental ways from market forms of the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adler's (2001) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationComplex social relationships embed value creation in any market.
“Complex social relationships embed value creation in any market (Lusch and Vargo 2014;Vargo, Wieland, and Akaka 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lusch and Vargo 2014 source
- cites Vargo, Wieland, and Akaka 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors sought negative cases and revised or abandoned theoretical notions based on whether they fit.
“We sought negative cases and revised or abandoned theoretical notions on the basis of whether they fit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause their technology platforms combine social actors into various exchange-related configurations, LEMs do not fall neatly into existing categories but create new legal categories and institutional practices.
“Because their technology platforms combine social actors into various exchange-related configurations, LEMs do not fall neatly into existing categories but create new legal categories and institutional practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe findings benefit from the contextual richness of the ethnographic method to demonstrate and organize the empirical complexity of LEMs.
“Our findings benefit from the contextual richness of our ethnographic method to demonstrate and organize the empirical complexity of LEMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenNovel social situations in LEMs are social but also instrumental, commodified, opportunistic, intermediated, and ephemeral.
“These novel situations are social, but they are also instrumental, commodified, opportunistic, intermediated, and ephemeral.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConsociality is constrained on Kickstarter, but social presence remains salient, and a type of para-social interaction develops similar to the one-sided attachment felt between fans and celebrities.
“Although avenues for more extensive interaction between actors are available, a type of “para-social interaction” (Horton and Wohl 1956) develops, similar to the one-sided attachment felt between fans and celebrities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horton and Wohl 1956 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMatchmakers provide their greatest source of value by appropriately pairing network actors.
“They provide their greatest source of value by appropriately pairing network actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHubs must operate in an LEM business environment devoid of the attractive, humanizing, and trust-inspiring benefits of copresence.
“Hubs must operate in an LEM business environment devoid of the attractive, humanizing, and trustinspiring benefits of copresence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHomejoy treated its cleaners like employees and grew rapidly, but it faced three major Hub challenges-quality control, legal disputes over independent contractor status, and retention problems from opportunism of copresence-and ceased operations in July 2015.
“Although they were lateral network actors, Homejoy's cleaners were treated like employees; the platform charged customers for their services just as if it were any other cleaning service.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“Homejoy faced three major challenges common to the Hub form.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“Homejoy's quality control, legal, and opportunism challenges sunk the company.It ceased operations in July 2015.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe sharing economy literature connects peer exchange with utopian themes, casting its market forms in a generally positive, sometimes idyllic, light.
“The sharing economy literature (Belk 2014) connects peer exchange with utopian themes, casting its market forms in a generally positive, sometimes idyllic, light (Arnould and Rose 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Belk 2014 source
- cites Arnould and Rose 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenActing as an intermediary, the platform provider offers the two potential benefits of creating the marketplace and lowering various transaction costs.
“Acting as an intermediary, the platform provider offers the two potential benefits of creating the marketplace and lowering various transaction costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenActing as a social space, the platform offers the opportunity to communicate, personalize, and negotiate.
“Acting as a social space, the platform offers the opportunity to communicate, personalize, and negotiate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningDepending on the industry, copresence elements may be important sources of value for actors.
“Depending on the industry, these elements may be important sources of value for actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataAcross all empirical LEM cases, the need to instill and manage trust was strongly evident, and technology platforms and institutional arrangements such as third-party verification, liability insurance, and money-back guarantees are important to creating the trust required for this new form of exchange to gain social acceptance.
“Across all of our empirical LEM cases, the need to instill and manage trust was strongly evident.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEnablers can minimize transaction risks by placing actors within a networking platform that allows them to broadcast a personal message that inspires interest and trust in other actors.
“Enablers can minimize transaction risks by placing actors within a networking platform that allows them to broadcast a personal message that inspires interest and trust in other actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model indicates that Zipcar is a Hub type, an LEM that deliberately inhibits consociality among actors and instead confers trust through strong platform intermediation.
“Our model indicates that Zipcar is a Hub type, an LEM that deliberately inhibits consociality among actors and instead confers trust through strong platform intermediation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough all LEMs create value by bringing actors together, not all of them must use platforms with sophisticated algorithms or perform complex optimization tasks; Forum types rely on social connection for coordination and optimization, whereas Enabler LEMs equip actors to sell to one another.
“For example, although it is true that all LEMs create value by bringing actors together, not all of them must use platforms with sophisticated algorithms, or perform complex optimization tasks.”
- Also stated in: § Revealing the Different Types of LEMs · plain
“Craigslist, Freecycle, and other Forum types rely on social connection between actors for these coordination and optimization tasks, whereas Enabler LEMs such as Yerdle and 99Dresses perform them by equipping actors to sell to one another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Revealing the Different Types of LEMs · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLending Club's fiscal responsibilities and high need for exchange assurance enable it to provide a platform that handles every element of the exchange, renders personal identities invisible, and severely limits consociality.
“Lending Club's fiscal responsibilities and high need for exchange assurance enable it to provide a platform that handles every element of the exchange, renders personal identities invisible, and severely limits consociality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIt is the platform itself that actors will trust in Hubs.
“It is the platform itself that actors will trust, so the Hub would be wise to invest in its technology and branding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: From a network actor's perspective in Hubs, all other network actors are interchangeable.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenForums reduce search costs and provide their greatest customer value by facilitating connections.
“Forums reduce search costs and provide their greatest customer value by facilitating connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSkillshare failed as a Matchmaker because its high consociality was not accompanied by corresponding safeguards, customers were concerned about safety, logistics for face-to-face classes were difficult and expensive, and competitors such as Udemy were replacing in-person classes with distance learning video technology.
“First, the high consociality of the offering was not accompanied by corresponding safeguards.”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“Second, the logistics required to arrange face-to-face classes and teaching were difficult and expensive.”
- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
“Finally, Skillshare's market competitors, such as Udemy, were effectively replacing in-person classes with distance learning video technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Matchmaker Cases · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningForums are most effective when they facilitate a free flow of messages.
“Although it might be tempting to try to usurp control of between-actor communications or to filter them through the company, our model suggests that Forums are most effective when they facilitate a free flow of messages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese LEM types each face particular transaction risks that require managers to balance network actors' trust in the transaction with the risks that actors, once connected, will no longer need them.
“In addition, these types each face particular transaction risks that will require managers to balance network actors' trust in the transaction with the risks that actors, once connected, will no longer need them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Actors, once connected through an LEM, will no longer need the platform.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe eight empirical examples illustrate the diversity of LEMs and demonstrate how sociality and platform intermediation work in concert with institutional attempts to legitimate the company to provide either effective or ineffective solutions to governance and trust issues.
“These eight empirical examples-Homejoy, Quirky, Skillshare, TaskRabbit, thredUP, Kickstarter, Zimride, and Craigslist-illustrate the diversity of LEMs.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · boosted
“They also demonstrate how the underlying dimensions of sociality and platform intermediation work in concert with institutional attempts to legitimate the company to provide either effective or ineffective solutions to governance and trust issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The eight selected LEM cases are sufficiently representative of the LEM population to support a general typology.
- Rests on an assumption: The success or failure of the case companies can be attributed to their LEM configuration and trust management rather than other unobserved factors.
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · boosted
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationQuirky's high platform intermediation strategy caused it to struggle with production and retail distribution costs, and it failed to properly attract high-quality inventors looking for a stable system.
“The financial commitments required by Quirky's high platform intermediation strategy caused the company to struggle with production and retail distribution costs (Martin 2015).”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“The company also failed to properly attract highquality inventors who were looking for a stable system on which to develop and profit from their new product ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenHubs' core value proposition lies in the centralized exchanges they generate through their direct service interaction with network actors.
“Their core value proposition lies in the centralized exchanges they generate through their direct service interaction with network actors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy minimizing sociality, Quirky limited participants' abilities to collaborate, and anonymizing participation constrained its ability to attract talented inventors; these social elements were added too late, and Quirky filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September 2015.
“By minimizing sociality, Quirky limited participants' abilities to collaborate.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“Anonymizing participation constrained the site's ability to attract talented inventors.”
- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
“However, these social elements were added too late.The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September 2015.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hub Cases · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningNetwork actors will be particularly attracted to the Hub's platform.
“Network actors will be particularly attracted to the Hub's platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn some industries, the optimal performance of network actors may require collaboration or the acknowledgment of rare talent.
“In some industries, the optimal performance of network actors may require collaboration or the acknowledgment of rare talent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenTools for many value-creating practices can be programmed into the software interface of the platform.
“Tools for many of these practices can be programmed into the software interface of the platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMatchmakers lower monitoring costs, simplify search, and facilitate better decision making for actors.
“Matchmakers lower monitoring costs, simplify search, and facilitate better decision making for actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEnablers provide value by lowering search costs and making it easier for actors to decide to transact.
“Enablers provide value by lowering search costs and making it easier for actors to decide to transact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationActors' trust in LEMs' technology platforms is often based on a normative belief in the legitimacy of their algorithms or faith in algorithms in a general sense.
“Actors' trust in LEMs' technology platforms is often similarly based on a normative belief in the legitimacy of their algorithms-or perhaps faith in algorithms in a general sense (O'Neil 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Neil 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe multibarreled approach to trust is crucial for Matchmakers because, although network actors connect through the matchmaker's platform, most exchanges are finalized offline.
“The multibarreled approach to trust is crucial because, although network actors connect through the matchmaker's platform, most exchanges are finalized offline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe platform would then simplify, standardize, and encourage actors to use these value-creating tools and practices.
“The platform would then simplify, standardize, and encourage actors to use these value-creating tools and practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWith an enabler LEM such as Kickstarter, a predetermined format for the online exchange provides a degree of consistency but also allows actors to improvise and display their individuality.
“With an enabler LEM such as Kickstarter, a predetermined format for the online exchange provides a degree of consistency but also allows actors to improvise and display their individuality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningWe know very little about how the sharing economy actually operates.
“its relative newness means that we know very little about how it actually operates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The sharing economy has grown rapidly and been the beneficiary of significant public attention over the past few years.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe next major task of a Forum-to help manage actors' transaction risks-flows directly from this high degree of freedom.
“The next major task of a Forum-to help manage actors' transaction risks-flows directly from this high degree of freedom.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenInstitutional norms are still in flux regarding this new form of business, necessitating governance with additional assurances such as insurance and guarantees.
“Institutional norms are still in flux regarding this new form of business, necessitating governance with additional assurances such as insurance and guarantees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHubs lower the costs associated with search, decision making, monitoring, and exchange enforcement.
“Hubs lower the costs associated with search, decision making, monitoring, and exchange enforcement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLEMs must build legitimacy and trust to achieve success.
“Uber's scandals (Newcomer 2017) and Homejoy's problems are not atypical issues for LEMs, whose new forms are transforming the world of business but must build legitimacy and trust to achieve success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
LEM buyers and sellers usually have no prior experience with one another.
“Lateral exchange market buyers and sellers usually have no prior experience with one another and occupy roughly equivalent positions in the network.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary business is far more complex and dynamic than our models can accommodate.
“Contemporary business is far more complex and dynamic than our models can accommodate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The eight selected LEM cases are sufficiently representative of the LEM population to support a general typology.
“These eight empirical examples-Homejoy, Quirky, Skillshare, TaskRabbit, thredUP, Kickstarter, Zimride, and Craigslist-illustrate the diversity of LEMs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The success or failure of the case companies can be attributed to their LEM configuration and trust management rather than other unobserved factors.
“They also demonstrate how the underlying dimensions of sociality and platform intermediation work in concert with institutional attempts to legitimate the company to provide either effective or ineffective solutions to governance and trust issues.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Interview informants' and fieldnotes' accounts accurately represent user experiences.
“In recounting their exchange experiences on Craigslist, our interview informants related numerous uncertainties about the norms governing the exchange”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sharing economy has grown rapidly and been the beneficiary of significant public attention over the past few years.
“Although the so-called sharing economy has grown rapidly and been the beneficiary of significant public attention over the past few years, its relative newness means that we know very little about how it actually operates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Actors, once connected through an LEM, will no longer need the platform.
“In addition, these types each face particular transaction risks that will require managers to balance network actors' trust in the transaction with the risks that actors, once connected, will no longer need them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
From a network actor's perspective in Hubs, all other network actors are interchangeable.
“From a network actor's perspective, all other network actors are interchangeable, so it would therefore be sensible for Hub firms to invest in the cutting-edge abilities of the platform, its capacity to assess or mitigate risk, its ease of use and strong technical performance.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective platform governance fosters trust through "sociality management," and institutional and legal arrangements that enable exchange mediation.
“Effective platform governance fosters trust through “sociality management,” and institutional and legal arrangements that enable exchange mediation”
From Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019) · cites this paper as Perren and Kozinets, 2018
Risk and uncertainty in peer-to-peer transactions are mitigated through instilling and managing trust via institutional and legal governance mechanisms.
“risk and uncertainty are mitigated through instilling and managing trust via institutional and legal governance mechanisms”
From Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019) · cites this paper as Perren and Kozinets, 2018
Tools to build loyalty include evangelizing, milestoning, badging and documenting, and incentive systems for service providers to increase their activity on the platform.
“Potential responses are tools to build loyalty include evangelizing, milestoning, badging and documenting (Perren and Kozinets, 2018), and incentive systems for service providers to increase their activity on the platform (Chen et al., 2018).”
From Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019) · cites this paper as Perren and Kozinets, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A gift-giving platform is classified as an LEM despite an explicit exclusion
MinorThe paper explicitly excludes gifting from LEMs, yet treats Freecycle as an LEM even though its described exchanges consist of giving goods away for free. This affects which markets the proposed typology covers.
“although we exclude gifting and sharing from LEMs”
“Freecycle is an example of an LEM in which the extent of platform intermediation is low.Freecycle provides a basic central website connecting those who wish to give away various sorts of used goods (such as old televisions or furniture) with those willing to pick up these goods.”
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,037 · see citing works
Stake, R. E. (2005) · Cited by 4,706 · see citing works
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380 · see citing works
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998 · see citing works
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,110 · see citing works
You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online
Belk, R. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · Cited by 2,951 · see citing works
Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods
Dijkstra, L. (1985) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(85)90239-5 · Cited by 2,913 · see citing works
McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451 · Cited by 2,661 · see citing works
How Brand Community Practices Create Value
Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30 · Cited by 2,444 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 2,334 · see citing works
Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/666376 · Cited by 2,015 · see citing works
The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions
Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., Bolton, R. N., & Webster, F. E. (2006) · Cited by 1,671 · see citing works
Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism
Adler, P. S. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117 · Cited by 1,512 · see citing works
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Managing User Trust in B2C e-Services
Gefen, & Straub (2003) · e-Service Journal · doi:10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation
Arnould, E. J., & Wallendorf, M. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100404 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0368 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system
Aberer, K., & Despotovic, Z. (2001) · Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM'01 · doi:10.1145/502636.502638 · Cited by 915
Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system
(2001) · doi:10.1145/502585.502638 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Covà, B., & Pace, S. (2006) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560610681023 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Networked: The New Social Operating System
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2014) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.008 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Wittel, A. (2001) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/026327601018006003 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Kozinets, R. V. (2015) · The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Self-citationFligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315699035 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture
Miller, V. (2008) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856508094659 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S. B., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.spl.s138 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv053 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
The language that gets people to give
Mitra, T., & Gilbert, É. (2014) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531656 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Burning Man at Google: a cultural infrastructure for new media production
Turner, F. (2009) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444808099575 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Shared, Collaborative and On Demand: The New Digital Economy
Smith, A. C. T. (2016) · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research
(2012) · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationMarcoux, J.-S. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/600485 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society
Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810370951 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Wittel, A. (2001) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632760122052048 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Kvist, J. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Arnould, E. J., & Rose, A. S. (2015) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593115572669 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A Service-Dominant Logic for Marketing
(2011) · doi:10.4135/9781446222454.n12 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research
(2014) · Cited by 110 · see citing works
(2012) · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Legitimation of hybrid cultural products: The case of American Yoga
Coskuner-Balli, G., & Ertimur, B. (2017) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593116659786 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
(2011) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S. B., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1840668 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
(2016) · doi:10.24926/265535.1037 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Denegri‐Knott, J., & Tadajewski, M. (2016) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593116677766 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
(2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31262-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1939289
Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy Formulation
Arnould, E. J., & Wallendorf, M. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151878
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Arnould Eric J., 2006, The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing, 91
- Arsel Zeynep, 2011, Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 66
- Blalock Hubert M., 1969, Theory Construction
- BusinessWire (2012), “thredUP Launches Online Concierge Service to Compete with Children's Consignment,” press release (January 25), https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/12/01/b2287737/thredup-launches-online-concierge-service-to-compete-with-childrens-con.
- BusinessWire (2016), “thredUP Poised to Bring 300 New Jobs to Metro Atlanta Area,” press release (July 26), http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160726006062/en/thredUP-Poised-Bring-300-New-Jobs-Metro.
- Dyck Noel, 2002, Realizing Community: Concepts, Social Relationships and Sentiments, 105
- Lobel Orly, 2016, Minnesota Law Review, 101, 87
- Lu June, 2012, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 50
- NotoAnthony (2016), “Skillshare to Tap $12M to Bolster Online Education Offerings Across Globe,” New York Business Journal (May 26), https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2016/05/26/skillshare-to-tap-12m-to-bolster-online-education.html.
- PR Newswire (2010), “thredUp Launches Kids Clothing Exchange Website,” press release (April 12), http://a.aselabs.com/news.php?id=8018.
- Schutz Alfred, 1962, Collected Papers
- StangelLuke (2017), “TaskRabbit Could Be Looking for an Exit—by Way of a Sale,” Silicon Valley Business Journal (April 10), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2017/04/10/taskrabbit-could-be-looking-for-an-exit-by-way-of.html.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033 · Cited by 1,369 · see citing works
Marketing in the Sharing Economy
Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C. P., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919861929 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Retailing Value Chain
Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloß, M. (2018) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.12.002 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Branding in a Hyperconnected World: Refocusing Theories and Rethinking Boundaries
Swaminathan, V., Sorescu, A., Steenkamp, J., O'Guinn, T. C., & Schmitt, B. H. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919899905 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy
Wirtz, J., So, K. K. F., Mody, M. A., Liu, S. Q., & Chun, H. H. (2019) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2018-0369 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
The Role of Marketing in Digital Business Platforms
Rangaswamy, A., Moch, N., Felten, C., van Bruggen, G. H., Wieringa, J. E., & Wirtz, J. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.006 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
The sharing economy: A comprehensive business model framework
Ritter, M., & Schanz, H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.154 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Nadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Shirazi, F., & Hajli, N. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119786 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Clarifying the Sharing Economy: Conceptualization, Typology, Antecedents, and Effects
Gerwe, O., & Silva, R. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0010 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Styvén, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21334 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Marketing perspectives on digital business models: A framework and overview of the special issue
Verhoef, P. C., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.08.001 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
How legacy firms can embrace the digital ecosystem via digital customer orientation
Kopalle, P. K., Kumar, V., & Subramaniam, M. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00694-2 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way
Andreassen, T. W., Lervik-Olsen, L., Snyder, H., van Riel, A. C. R., Sweeney, J., & Vaerenbergh, Y. V. (2018) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2018-0125 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Digital platform openness: Drivers, dimensions and outcomes
Broekhuizen, T., Emrich, O., Gijsenberg, M. J., Broekhuis, M., Donkers, B., & Sloot, L. M. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.001 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Emerging themes and theories in the sharing economy: a critical note for hospitality and tourism
Altınay, L., & Taheri, B. (2018) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-02-2018-0171 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Tan, T. M., & Salo, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-05015-8 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Access-Based Services as Substitutes for Material Possessions: The Role of Psychological Ownership
Fritze, M. P., Marchand, A., Eisingerich, A. B., & Benkenstein, M. (2020) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670520907691 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Nadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Hajli, N., & Tajvidi, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04314-5 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Sharers and sellers: A multi-group examination of gig economy workers' perceptions
Gleim, M. R., Johnson, C., & Lawson, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.041 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Pantano, E., & Stylos, N. D. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21345 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Yuan, R., Luo, J., Liu, M. J., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.012 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Wichmann, J. R. K., Wiegand, N., & Reinartz, W. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429211054073 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Minami, A. L., RAMOS, C. S. D. M., & Bortoluzzo, A. B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.035 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy
Christodoulides, G., Athwal, N., Boukis, A., & Semaan, R. W. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.022 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Providers Versus Platforms: Marketing Communications in the Sharing Economy
Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920925038 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption
Ertz, M., Durif, F., & Arcand, M. (2018) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-018-0121-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kumar, V., Nim, N., & Agarwal, A. (2020) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00346-6 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Business model diversification in the sharing economy: The case of GoMore
Guyader, H., & Piscicelli, L. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.114 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
No one rides for free! Three styles of collaborative consumption
Guyader, H. (2018) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-11-2016-0402 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Lu, B., Yan, L., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103024 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The Sharing Economy: A Marketing Perspective
Lim, W. M. (2020) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.007 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Sharing economy: International marketing strategies
Kozlenkova, I. V., Lee, J.-Y., Xiang, D., & Palmatier, R. W. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00393-z · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Customer experience creation for after-use products: A product–service systems-based review
Schallehn, H., Seuring, S. A., Strähle, J., & Freise, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.292 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Exploring the meaning of work within the sharing economy: A case of food-delivery workers
Lin, P. M. C., Au, W. C. W., Leung, V. T. Y., & Peng, K.-L. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102686 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Luo, X., Tong, S., Lin, Z., & Zhang, C. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920962510 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Made to break? A taxonomy of business models on product lifetime extension
Ertz, M., Leblanc-Proulx, S., Sarigöllü, E., & Morin, V. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.264 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Akter, S., Babu, M. M., Hossain, M. A., & Hani, U. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.077 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Fueling innovation management research: Future directions and five forward‐looking paths
Spanjol, J., Noble, C. H., Baer, M., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Bohlmann, J. D., Bouncken, R. B., Bstieler, L., Luca, L. M. D., Garcia, R., Gemser, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12754 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Driving growth of Mwallets in emerging markets: a retailer’s perspective
Kumar, V., Nim, N., & Sharma, A. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0613-6 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Kozinets, R. V. (2021) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-07-2021-0263 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, C., Botella-Carrubí, D., & González‐Tejero, C. B. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123142 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Why customers and peer service providers do not participate in collaborative consumption
Hazée, S., Zwienenberg, T. J., Vaerenbergh, Y. V., Faseur, T., Vandenberghe, A., & Keutgens, O. (2020) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2018-0357 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Maier, E., & Wieringa, J. E. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.09.007 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Factors Increasing Consumer Engagement of Branded Content in Instagram
Cuevas-Molano, E., Matosas-López, L., & Bravo, C. B. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3121186 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
How Consumer Orchestration Work Creates Value in the Sharing Economy
Scaraboto, D., & Figueiredo, B. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429211027777 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Suri, A., Huang, B., & Sénécal, S. (2019) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2019.1644958 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
International mobile marketing: a satisfactory concept for companies and users in times of pandemic
Florido‐Benítez, L. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-06-2021-0303 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Seller marketing capability, brand reputation, and consumer journeys on e-commerce platforms
Mu, J., & Zhang, J. Z. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00773-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The platformization of consumer culture: A theoretical framework
Caliandro, A., Gandini, A., Bainotti, L., & Anselmi, G. (2024) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/14705931231225537 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hajiheydari, N., & Delgosha, M. S. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-11-2022-0873 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The Sharing Economy and Business Model Design: A Configurational Approach
Jiang, F., Zheng, X., Fan, D., Zhang, P., & Li, S. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12711 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Will “no-ownership” work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers
Park, H., & Armstrong, C. M. J. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.012 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Consumer engagement on social media: insights from a virtual brand community
Lima, V., Irigaray, H. A. R., & Lourenço, C. E. (2018) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-02-2017-0059 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Baker, J. J., Kearney, T., Laud, G., & Holmlund, M. (2021) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-08-2020-0300 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Weber, C. E., Okraku, M., Mair, J., & Maurer, I. (2021) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwab008 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Thompson, C. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1579751 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Retailing Value ChainPreprint
Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloß, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3299669 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The future of marketing analytics in the sharing economy
Akter, S., Hani, U., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Sharma, A. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.008 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Ertz, M., Leblanc-Proulx, S., Sarigöllü, E., & Morin, V. (2019) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104437 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122121 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons
Delgosha, M. S., & Hajiheydari, N. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.031 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Coopetition with platforms: Balancing the interplay of cooperation and competition in hospitality
Bahar, V. S., Nenonen, S., & Starr, R. G., Jr. (2021) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104417 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Yao, Q., Baker, L. T., & Lohrke, F. T. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.046 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Consumer adoption of on‐demand digital platforms: An integrated model
Lim, T., Lim, B. C., Leong, C., Phang, I. G., & Foong, W. H. (2023) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22210 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Lin, P. M. C., Peng, K.-L., Au, W. C. W., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-12-2021-1531 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ditta-Apichai, M., Kattiyapornpong, U., & Ulrike Gretzel, B. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-05-2019-0079 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Schulz, P., Shehu, E., & Clément, M. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.01.003 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic
Helkkula, A., & Arnould, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.031 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hazée, S., Vaerenbergh, Y. V., Delcourt, C., & Kabadayi, S. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2019-0581 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Nguyen, S., Alaoui, M. D., & Llosa, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.021 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Fan, A., Shin, H. W., Shi, J. J., & Wu, L. L. (2022) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655221119463 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A pathway to consumer forgiveness in the sharing economy: The role of relationship norms
Shuqair, S., Pinto, D. C., So, K. K. F., Rita, P., & Mattila, A. S. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103041 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mai, S., Ketron, S. C., & Yang, J. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21269 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Herold, P. I., & Prokop, D. (2023) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103873 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The impact of customer-generated evaluation information on sales in online platform-based markets
Kim, D.-Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103016 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
da Silveira, A. B., Levrini, G. R. D., & Ertz, M. (2021) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2021.1907828 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems
Nerbel, J. F., & Kreutzer, M. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00625-8 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Culiberg, B., Abosag, I., & Čater, B. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.04.007 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Decisions, decisions: variations in decision-making for access-based consumption
Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., & Hartline, M. D. (2021) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2020.1855990 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Managing service providers in the sharing economy: Insights from Airbnb’s host management
von Richthofen, G., & von Wangenheim, F. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.049 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Service recovery and loyalty of Uber sharing economy: The mediating effect of trust
Amoako, G. K., Dzogbenuku, R. K., & Kumi, D. K. (2021) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100647 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Performance effects of innovation in two-sided markets: The paradigmatic case of OTAs
Raad, J., Sharma, A., & Nicolau, J. (2023) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104637 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Contrived Surplus and Negative Externalities in the Sharing Economy
Griffiths, M. A., Perera, B. Y., & Albinsson, P. A. (2019) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2019.1644957 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Access-based customer journeys
Torres, L. T., Anlamlier, E., Mimoun, L., Chatterjee, L., & Dion, D. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-023-00942-6 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Rifkin, L. S., Kirk, C. P., & Corus, C. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad002 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Jiang, J., Feng, R., & Li, E. Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095095 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Creating a world where anyone can belong anywhere: Consumer equality in the sharing economy
Lee, K., Hakstian, A., & Williams, J. D. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.036 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Factors Affecting BoP Producer Intention to Use P2P Lending Platforms in India
Kumra, R., Khalek, S. A., & Samanta, T. (2021) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1915440 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Soccer and Twitter: virtual brand community engagement practices
Zanini, M. T., de Moraes, F. C., Lima, V., Migueles, C. P., Lourenço, C. E., & Irigaray, H. A. R. (2019) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-08-2018-0371 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Campbell, C., Sands, S., Montecchi, M., & Schau, H. J. (2022) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2053901 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Review of studies on digital transaction platforms in marketing journals
Hänninen, M. (2019) · The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research · doi:10.1080/09593969.2019.1651380 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wang, T., Zhao, X., & Wang, X. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114854 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Mehrwald, P., Treffers, T., Titze, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.555 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Mai, E. S., & Ketron, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.039 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
From channel integration to platform integration: Capabilities required in hospitality
Bahar, V. S., Nenonen, S., & Starr, R. G., Jr. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.02.003 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
An empathy lens into peer service providers: Personal versus commercial hosts
Shuqair, S., Pinto, D. C., & Mattila, A. S. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103073 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Peer-to-Peer Dining: A Motivation Study
Lin, P. M. C., Ok, C. “., & Au, W. C. W. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348021990709 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Relationships among actors within the sharing economy: Meta-analytics review
Barari, M. M., Paul, J., Ross, M., Quach, S., & Surachartkumtonkun, J. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103215 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Achilles’ heel of the platform business model: Disintermediation
Ladd, T. (2021) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.049 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Fritze, M. P., Urmetzer, F., Khan, G. F., Sarstedt, M., Neely, A. D., & Schäfers, T. (2018) · Journal of Service Management Research · doi:10.15358/2511-8676-2018-3-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V.
- Affiliations
- California State University, San Marcos (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perren, Rebeca
- Kozinets, Robert V.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-36
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2757209552
- Semantic Scholar
- 62b266886e146ec22fbe3e30d95c498a3c1307c3
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 46.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- John Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Foundation
- Florida Education Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Keywords
- peer-to-peer markets, sharing economy, social platforms, platform intermediation, network economy, ideal types, exchange security, opportunism, platform algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review