Cited by 222Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys

Open access
Braunsberger, Karin, Wybenga, Hans, Gates, Roger·2007·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online consumer panel surveys can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys, are cheaper and less time consuming, and are a viable alternative for high-quality research.

    “Braunsberger et al. (2007) found that survey data collected from an online consumer panel to be of good quality.They collected data from two waves of telephone surveys and web-panel surveys.They found that web panels can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys.They also found that, web panels were cheaper and less time consuming to conduct than telephone surveys.They state that”

    From How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity (2011) · cites this paper as Braunsberger et al. (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braunsberger, K., Wybenga, H., & Gates, R.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
  • Aetna (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Braunsberger, Karin
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
758-764
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038594808
Cited by
222
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
25.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Archive @ University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
telephone surveys, online surveys, survey reliability, web panels, cold calling, consumer panel, data collection methods, survey cost comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review