Cited by 102Nostalgia and Consumer BehaviorNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity

Open access
Merchant, Altaf, Ford, John B., Rose, Gregory·2011·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.06.013

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 104 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change with time.

    “Carnelly et al. (2006) found that the positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change with time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carnelly et al. (2006) source
  • Findingown data

    The study found support for nine out of the ten hypothesized relationships.

    “The study found support for nine out of the ten hypothesized relationships.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior study has linked personal nostalgia to charitable giving.
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior study has comprehensively examined the role of potential factors influencing nostalgia in the context of charitable giving.
    • Rests on an assumption: The relationship between recovery from grief and nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity has not been studied.
  • Findingown data

    At the aggregate sample level, there were no significant differences in mean scores between donors who received a thank you note and those who did not.

    “However, at an aggregate sample level there were no significant differences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Aging does not have a significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=-0.071, t=-1.585, not significant).

    “Contrary to what was hypothesized, this study found that Aging does not have a significant impact on Personal Nostalgia, hence hypothesis 4 is not supported.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
  • Findingown data

    Loneliness has a positive significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=0.151, t=3.148, p<0.01; reduced model: beta=0.227, t=4.508, p<0.001).

    “The path coefficient = 0.151, (t=3.148) is significant at pO.Ol.Therefore, hypothesis 3 is supported.”
    • Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · boosted
      “The findings of this study confirmed that loneliness has a significant impact on Personal Nostalgia (path coefficient =0.227, t=4.508, pO.OOl).Therefore, hypothesis 3 is supported.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 65
  • May combine two claims. 48
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Batcho (1995) Personal Nostalgia Inventory has good reliability (split-half r=0.78, p<.01; test-retest r=0.84, p<.01; Wildschut et al. (2006) alpha=0.88).

    “Using the split half method she found that the scale had good reliability (r=0.78,p<.01).Using test retest method (administering this scale to the same individual twice, using an interval of one week), she found good correlation between the average rating across the twenty items (r=0.84,p<.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Batcho (1995) source
    • cites Wildschut et al. (2006) source

      The Manipulation check section (p. 22) reports α = .88 for Wildschut et al.’s administration of Batcho’s Nostalgia Inventory, supporting that part of the claim. Our copy does not report the cited split-half correlation (r = .78) or one-week test–retest correlation (r = .84). (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Positive emotions evoked by memories of the deceased do not change over time, while the frequency of negative-emotion thoughts decreases over time but the frequency of pleasantness thoughts does not.

    “Carnelly et al. (2006) found that the positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change over time.Even though the frequency of thoughts that resulted in negative emotions decreased over time, the frequency of thoughts that resulted in pleasantness did not decrease over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carnelly et al. (2006) source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The statistical tests found support for nine of the ten research hypotheses.

    “Structural equation model was run and the statistical tests found support for nine of the research hypotheses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility and 4.8% of the variance of familial utility.

    “This model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility and 4.8% of the variance of familial utility, which are both small.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The model explains 43.7% of the variance of commitment and 74.7% of the variance in the intention to donate.

    “Finally, this model explains 43.7% of the variance of commitment and 74.7%) of the variance in the intention to donate, which are both large.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The other endogenous constructs were impacted less significantly than personal nostalgia by eliminating Aging and Discontinuity.

    “The other endogenous constructs were impacted less significantly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The revised model with eight latent constructs (eliminating Aging and Discontinuity) shows reasonably good fit: X2(694)=1410, X2/df=2.03, CFI=0.92, IFI=0.93, TLI=0.92, GFI=0.87, RMSEA=0.045.

    “The structural model shows reasonably good fit (%2 (694) = 1410, X 2/df=2.03,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.93,TLI=0.92,GFI=0.87,RMSEA=0.045).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The revised model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility, 5% of the variance of familial utility, 43.8% of the variance of commitment and 74.8% of the variance in the intention to donate.

    “The model now explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility, 5% of the variance of familial utility, 43.8% of the variance of commitment and 74.8% of the variance in the intention to donate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The path coefficients for H8, H9, H10 are 0.279, 0.590, 0.865 respectively, and are significant.

    “H8 H9 H10 0.279 0.590 0.865 ** significant at p<0.001 4.910** 10.472** 14.089** * significant atp<0.01”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Perceived demonstrable benefits associated with charitable giving help persuade non-donors to become donors.

    “The perceived demonstrable benefits (selfish gains like invitations to gala events (Kottasz, 2004)) associated with charitable giving helps to persuade non-donors to become donors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Personal nostalgia involves warmth and joy from remembering the past and a sense of loss that the past is no more.

    “There is the warmth and the joy arising out of remembering the past but there is also a sense of loss that the past is no more (Holak and Havlena, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holak and Havlena, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People facing discontinuous life experiences tend to get more nostalgic and look to the past for stability.

    “Those that face discontinuous life experiences tend to get more nostalgic and look to the past for a sense of stability (Mehta and Belk, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mehta and Belk, 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sargeant et al. (2006) summarized intrinsic determinants of giving under three categories: familial utility, emotional utility, and demonstrable utility.

    “Sargeant et al. (2006) summarized the intrinsic determinants of giving under three categories: familial utility (benefits to family members either alive or in memoriam), emotional utility (emotions felt) and demonstrable utility (a direct economic benefit accruing to the giver like the chance to attend a performance, dinner, event etc).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Perceived demonstrable benefits do not impact commitment nor trust in the charitable organization.

    “However, it does not impact commitment nor does it impact trust in the charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Baby boomers are aging and becoming increasingly nostalgic.

    “Since baby boomers are aging, they are becoming increasingly nostalgic (Unger et al., 1991)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Unger et al., 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    NPOs that give donors a window to experience personal nostalgia are likely to benefit through stronger bonds with current donors and by attracting nongivers.

    “NPOs that give the donor a window to experience personal nostalgia are likely to benefit through the creation of stronger bonds with current donors and by attracting nongivers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia evokes a poignant mixture of mental pain and joy.

    “It evokes a poignant mixture of mental pain and joy (Freud, 1926;Akhtar, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Freud, 1926

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Akhtar, 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Higher emotional utility and familial utility lead to greater commitment and greater giving to that charitable organization.

    “The higher the emotional utility (emotions felt out of giving) and familial utility (link to family), the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that would be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Sargeant et al. (2006) suggest familial utility may be affected by nostalgia because desire for the situation experienced when a loved one was alive may influence giving in memory of that loved one.

    “Sargeant et al. (2006) suggest that familial utility may actually be affected by nostalgia since desire for the situation experienced or perceived to have been experienced when a loved one was still alive may influence giving in memory of that loved one.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    U.K. charities have also found it increasingly difficult to raise funds over the past 10 years.

    “Over the past 10 years charities in the U.K. have also been finding it increasingly difficult to raise funds (Sargeant et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia evokes a variety of emotions.

    “Academic work involving nostalgia has shown it to evoke a variety of emotions (Davis, 1979;Gardener, 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Davis, 1979

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gardener, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia can be a longing for a past not personally experienced, a 'lost past paradise'.

    “it also represents a longing for a”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peters, 1985 source
    • cites Stern, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia affects old and young alike.

    “Nostalgia has been found to affect old and young alike (McCann, 1941)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCann, 1941 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is increasing use of nostalgia in the marketing of consumer goods.

    “There is an increasing use of nostalgia in the marketing of consumer goods (Baker and Kennedy, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baker and Kennedy, 1994
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sargeant et al. (2006) proposed a perceptual model of donor giving behavior showing significant linkages between emotional utility, familial utility and commitment, which drives donor giving.

    “Recently, Sargeant et al. (2006) proposed a perceptual model of donor giving behavior which showed significant linkages between such perceptual dimensions as emotional utility (giving to feel better about oneself), familial utility (giving connected to a family member affected by the cause associated with the charity) and commitment which in turn was found to drive donor giving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There has been an increase in the number of charitable organizations.

    “Thirdly, there has been an increase in the number of charitable organizations (Sargeant et al., 2000)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most charitable giving is done by older adults, while the younger generation is less motivated to give.

    “What is apparent in an examination of this literature is that most of the charitable giving is done by older adults (Mathur, 1996;Pharoah and Tanner, 1997), while the younger generation is less motivated to give (Sargeant et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mathur, 1996 source
    • cites Pharoah and Tanner, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sargeant et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trust and commitment drive giving behavior.

    “Trust and commitment also drive giving behavior (Sargeant and Lee, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant and Lee, 2004 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Developing continued bonds with the deceased is one means of coping with death and fosters continuity of identity.

    “Bonnano and Kaltman (1999) argued that one of the means for coping with the death of an individual is to develop”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bonnano and Kaltman (1999) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emotional engagement is key to donor commitment, and emotionally engaged donors are more likely to give to charity.

    “Emotional engagement is key to donor commitment, and donors who are emotionally engaged are more likely to give to charity (Sarganet et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sarganet et al., 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Life Experiences Survey was tested among 345 respondents by Sarason et al. and was found to exhibit a reliability of 0.88 for the effect of negative events in life.

    “This was tested among 345 respondents by Sarason et al. (1978) and was found to exhibit a reliability of 0.88 for the effect of negative events in life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sarason et al. (1978) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Personal nostalgia is influenced by many factors, including discontinuity, past experiences, loneliness, age and the recovery from grief.

    “Personal nostalgia is influenced by many factors.They include discontinuity, past experiences, loneliness, age and the recovery from grief.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As people aged they got more nostalgic and remembered the times of their youth with considerable nostalgia as they entered older stages in life.

    “For example, Batcho (1995) found that as people aged they got more nostalgic and remembered the times of their youth with considerable nostalgia as they entered older stages in life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Batcho (1995) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Among both younger and older adults loneliness is linked to negative affects including boredom, unhappiness, and dissatisfaction.

    “Among both younger and older adults loneliness is linked to negative affects including boredom, unhappiness, and dissatisfaction (Perlman, Gerson, and Spinner, 1978).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Perlman, Gerson, and Spinner, 1978

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Personal nostalgia serves as an anchor of continuity and identity during changing circumstances in life.

    “It serves as an anchor of continuity and identity (Mehta and Belk, 1991) during changing circumstances in life (Noble and Walker, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mehta and Belk, 1991 source
    • cites Noble and Walker, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Commitment and trust are vital to create and maintain relationships.

    “For this to happen, it is proposed that commitment and trust are vital to create and maintain relationships (Morgan and Hunt, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morgan and Hunt, 1994 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The recall of the past leads to the evoking of both happy and sad emotions.

    “The recall of the past leads to the evoking of both happy and sad emotions (Bernsten and Rubin, 2002;Holak and Havlena, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bernsten and Rubin, 2002;Holak and Havlena, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia is evoked by a variety of triggers.

    “Nostalgia is evoked by a variety of triggers (Holbrook and Schindler, 2003;Schindler and Holbrook, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holbrook and Schindler, 2003 source
    • cites Schindler and Holbrook, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Imagery plays an important role in reliving past experiences.

    “Maclnnis and Price (1987) stated that imagery plays an important role in reliving past experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maclnnis and Price, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Personal nostalgia helps to alleviate feelings of loneliness.

    “It also helps to alleviate feelings of loneliness (Lomsky-Feder and Rapoport, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lomsky-Feder and Rapoport, 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By making a donation in the memory of the deceased, the giver remembers the loved one and is provided a sense of continuity.

    “Therefore, it appears that by making a donation in the memory of the deceased, the giver remembers the loved one and is provided a sense of continuity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are three phases of grief.

    “A review of the literature on grief shows that there are three phases of grief (Goalder, 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goalder, 1985 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Charitable giving is affected by commitment, which in turn is affected by trust and by emotional and familial utility, which are intrinsic, while trust is driven by organizational elements such as organizational professionalism and quality of communications, which are extrinsic.

    “Looking to the work of Sargeant et al. (2006), charitable giving is affected by commitment, which in turn is affected by trust and by emotional and familial utility, which are intrinsic, while trust is driven by organizational elements such as organizational professionalism and quality of communications, which are extrinsic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al. (2006) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The higher the emotional utility and familial utility, the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that will be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization.

    “The higher the emotional utility and familial utility, the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that will be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The personal nostalgia experience involves recalling experiences of the past and feeling the emotions of nostalgia.

    “The personal nostalgia experience involves recalling experiences of the past and feeling the emotions of nostalgia (Holak and Havlena, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holak and Havlena, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale was tested among 237 individuals and demonstrated good reliability (Alpha = 0.94).

    “Russell et al. (1980) tested this scale among 237 individuals and it demonstrated good reliability (Alpha = 0.94).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Russell et al. (1980) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Men and women have different triggers for nostalgia.

    “Researchers have also found that men and women have different triggers for nostalgia (Baker and Kennedy, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baker and Kennedy, 1994
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the context of giving to charity, NPOs that can assure continuity for donors facing discontinuity are likely to provide emotional benefits to the giver.

    “It is argued that in the context of giving to charity NPOs that can assure continuity for donors facing discontinuity are likely to provide emotional benefits to the giver.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Remembering the past makes a person feel warmth, joy and affection, but also sadness and loss that the past cannot be recreated.

    “By remembering the past, the person feels warmth, joy and affection (Holak and Havlena, 1998), but at the same time, there is a feeling of sadness and loss with the realization that the past cannot be recreated.(Holak and Havlena, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holak and Havlena, 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The Psychological Screening Inventory (Lanyon, 1970) is overly lengthy and was developed to measure psychiatric disorders, making it inappropriate for measuring loneliness in this study.

    “The Psychological Screening Inventory (1970) is a 130item scale which measures alienation, social non conformity and discomfort.The focus of this scale was on measuring these conditions among those who face major psychiatric disorder.Since this scale is overly lengthy and was developed to measure psychiatric disorders, it was felt to be inappropriate for use in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lanyon (1970) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study only retained the items of positive emotions for emotional utility.

    “This study only retained the items of positive emotions, future studies could also look at the role of negative emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    77.7% of respondents had donated to that charitable organization over four times ever before.

    “In terms of the number of times the respondents had donated to that charitable organization, 77.7% of the respondents in the sample indicated that they had given to that charitable organization over four times ever before (Table 45678).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    84% of respondents had done some college education or more.

    “The respondents in the sample were educated, 84% having done some college education or more (Table 45).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    As individuals get lonely, they tend to think of the past and get nostalgic and fondly remember the days of the past.

    “This implies that as individuals get lonely they tend to think of the past and tend to get nostalgic and fondly remember the days of the past.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model does a reasonably good job explaining and performs satisfactorily.

    “The fit looks reasonably good, and we can say that the model does a reasonably good job explaining, so the indications are that the model performs satisfactorily.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    70.9% of respondents had made their last donations less than three months ago.

    “In fact 70.9% of the respondents had made their donations less than three months ago (Table 456789).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data checks indicated no major issues and the data appeared balanced.

    “The check indicated that there were no major issues and the data appeared balanced.The data was also eyeballed for any issues on the respondent's demographic profile.The initial analysis showed that there were no major issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The racial profile of the respondents was skewed more towards Caucasians.

    “The racial profile of the respondents was skewed more towards Caucasians (Table 4-4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    There are other factors that also influence personal nostalgia.

    “It is evident there are other factors which also influence personal nostalgia and future studies may focus on capturing them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The balanced demographic profile of the sample enhances the generalizability of the study findings.

    “The balanced demographic profile of the sample was encouraging as it enhances the generalizability of the study findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Batcho (1995) scale measures proneness to be nostalgic but does not measure the intensity of the personal nostalgia the respondent is experiencing.

    “Firstly, this research uses the Batcho (1995) scale to measure the proneness to be nostalgic, but it does not measure the intensity of the personal nostalgia the respondent is experiencing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Batcho (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Familial Utility had a relatively low reliability (alpha=0.61) and no item deletion improved its alpha.

    “In this analysis, loadings with standardized factor construct which had a relatively low reliability was Familial Utility (a=0.61).Additional analysis was run for the increase/decrease in the Cronbach's Alpha if any of the scale items were dropped for the items of familial utility.The analysis showed that there was no opportunity to increase the alpha as there was a drop in the alpha if any of the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Online consumer panel surveys can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys, are cheaper and less time consuming, and are a viable alternative for high-quality research.

    “Braunsberger et al. (2007) found that survey data collected from an online consumer panel to be of good quality.They collected data from two waves of telephone surveys and web-panel surveys.They found that web panels can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys.They also found that, web panels were cheaper and less time consuming to conduct than telephone surveys.They state that”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braunsberger et al. (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are scales that measure the proneness or propensity for an individual to be nostalgic.

    “A review of the nostalgia literature has shown that there are scales that measure the proneness or propensity for an individual to be nostalgic (Holbrook, 1993, Batcho, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holbrook, 1993 source
    • cites Batcho, 1995 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The agency returned completed responses from 502 consumers who had donated money to charity in the last 12 months.

    “The agency returned completed responses from 502 consumers who had donated money to charity in the last 12 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As individuals experience discontinuity, they are likely to get nostalgic for the past because the past gives them a sense of security.

    “As hypothesized, this means that as individuals experience discontinuity they are likely to get nostalgic for the past, as the past gives them a sense of security.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Thinking of a deceased loved one likely makes the bereaved nostalgic about that person, which helps recovery from grief by maintaining continual bonds.

    “Therefore, one can argue that while thinking of the loved one, the bereaved remembers the loved one and it is likely that he or she will get nostalgic about that person.This helps the recovery from grief, as the griever feels that he or she has continual bonds with the deceased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Ranganathan and Henley (2007) intention to donate scale showed good reliability (alpha=0.89) among 214 individuals.

    “Ranganathan and Henley (2007) tested the four item intention to donate scale (Table 3-8) among 214 individuals and it showed good reliability (a=0.89).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ranganathan and Henley (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Holbrook (1993) nostalgia scale is not a good measure of personal nostalgia because it primarily measures vicarious nostalgia.

    “In fact Batcho (1998) argues that if we eliminate the items with small loadings, the Holbrook (1993) scale really only measures vicarious nostalgia.Hence, she argues that the Holbrook (1993) scale is not a good measure of personal nostalgia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Batcho (1998) source
    • cites Holbrook (1993) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    When remembering a deceased friend or relative, individuals get nostalgic about the times spent with the deceased loved one; as people cope with death, they seek solace in memories and get nostalgic.

    “This supports the arguments made by this study that when remembering the deceased friend or relative, individuals get nostalgic about the times they have spent with the deceased loved one.As people cope with the death of a loved one they seek solace in the memories of the deceased and get nostalgic for the days spent with the deceased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The current study used cross-sectional data.

    “Lastly, the current study used cross sectional data, future researches may want to use experimental design to test the impact of nostalgic appeals on charitable giving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 905 respondents who answered the first question, 505 (56%) qualified as having donated to charity in the last 12 months and continued the survey; 3 were removed for missing values.

    “For the current project 905 respondents answered the first question and then 505 (56%) qualified as having donated to charity in the last 12 months and continued the entire survey (3 respondents were removed from the data for having missing values).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The tested model shows that life stage factors (discontinuity, loneliness, recovery from grief, past experiences with charity) influence personal nostalgia, which provides emotional and familial utility, increasing commitment and intention to donate.

    “This research has found that fife stage factors like: the discontinuity the donor is experiencing, the extent to which the donor is feeling lonely, recovering from grief, along with whether the donor has significant past experiences associated with the charity influence the donor's personal nostalgia.The donor's personal nostalgia in turn provides emotional utility and familial utility to the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample had a balanced age breakdown with a mean age of 51 years.

    “A detailed analysis of the respondents showed that there was a balanced age break down on age (see Table 4-1).The average age of the respondents was 51 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The reliabilities of the latent constructs were: Intention to Donate 0.90, Commitment 0.82, Emotional Utility 0.88, Familial Utility 0.61, Personal Nostalgia 0.88, Loneliness 0.89.

    “Construct Intention to Donate Reliability (a): 0.90 Commitment Reliability (a): 0.82 Emotional Utility Reliability (a): 0.88 Familial Utility Reliability (a): 0.61 Personal Nostalgia Reliability (a): 0.88 Loneliness Reliability (a) : 0.89”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Web-based consumer panels enable researchers to collect data from a wide range and types of participants.

    “Fielding (2007) recognizes web based consumer panels for enabling researchers to leverage technology to collect data from a wide range and types of participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fielding (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Higher emotional utility and familial utility lead to greater commitment and greater giving to the charitable organization.

    “The higher the emotional utility (emotions felt out of giving) and familial utility (link to family), the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that is exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The sample profile analysis confirmed the data was not skewed and had a good spread, so findings would be generalizable to the population.

    “This analysis would help confirm that the data was not skewed.The sample was also analyzed for donation behavior.The amount donated, the type of charitable organization donated to and the frequency of donation to the concerned charitable organization was to be examined.This helped reconfirm that the data had a good spread and thus the findings would be generalizable to the population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The median gift amount was $40, with 46% donating less than $25 and 14% donating more than $150.

    “The median gift amount was $40, with 46% of the respondents indicating donations of less than $25 and 14% with relatively large amounts (more than $150).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The model takes intention to donate as the proxy for giving behavior.

    “Thirdly, this model takes the intention to donate as the proxy for giving behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Personal nostalgia results in emotional benefits for the donor and emotional engagement in the charitable giving context.

    “Thus, as argued in chapter three, personal nostalgia results in emotional benefits for the donor.This finding is key as it confirms that even in the charitable giving context personal nostalgia results in emotional engagement with the donors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study did not study the influence of personal nostalgia on the emotional engagement of non donors.

    “Sixthly, this study did not study the influence of personal nostalgia on the emotional engagement of non donors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The number of donors declined by 1.3% in 2006 over 2005 and by 1.7% in the first half of 2007 over 2006.

    “As per the Index of National Fundraising Performance of the Target Analysis Group (Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007) the number of donors has declined by 1.3% in 2006 over 2005 and by 1.7% in the first half of 2007 over 2006.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As per Cohen (1992), in models using multiple independent variables, an effect size of 2% is considered small, around 15% is considered medium and 35% or more is considered large.

    “As per Cohen (1992), in models using multiple independent variables, an effect size of 2% is considered small, around 15% is considered medium and 35% or more is considered large.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen (1992) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    These scales do not measure the intensity of the cognitive and emotional elements of the experience of personal nostalgia.

    “However, these scales do not measure the intensity of the cognitive and emotional elements of the experience of personal nostalgia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    High nostalgia prone consumers are more open to nostalgia appeals than low nostalgia prone individuals.

    “Holbrook and Schindler (1991) concluded that high nostalgia prone consumers are more open to nostalgia appeals than low nostalgia prone individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holbrook and Schindler (1991)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgia is just one type of time orientation, and there are five types of time orientation: past negative, past positive (nostalgia), present fatalistic, present hedonistic and future.

    “a review of the psychology literature shows that nostalgia is just one type of time orientation and that there are five types of time orientation: past negative, past positive (nostalgia), present fatalistic, present hedonistic and future (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Time orientation influences how consumers think, act and behave, and influences values, behavior and emotions.

    “Time orientation influences how consumers think, act and behave (Bergadaa 1990, Gonzalez andZimbardo, 1985), and influences values, behavior and emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bergadaa 1990 source
    • cites Gonzalez andZimbardo, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    There is a positive impact of 'being acknowledged' by the NPO on the Donor's Lifetime Value.

    “Bennett (2006) argues that there is a positive impact of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When a person experiences a stimulus that makes him feel negative emotions, he would feel motivated to overcome the negative emotions.

    “Thus it can be argued that when a person experiences stimulus that makes him feel negative emotions, he would feel motivated to overcome the negative emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People tend to maintain positive mood states and focus on moving away or changing their negative mood states.

    “People tend to maintain positive mood states and focus on moving away or changing their negative mood states (Isen et al., 1987).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Isen et al., 1987 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brands tell stories and consumers want to be involved in these stories and want their roles reconfirmed.

    “In the branding literature Woodside et al. (2008) state that brands tell stories and consumers want to be involved in these stories and want their roles reconfirmed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woodside et al. (2008) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Nostalgic appeals evoking the past may not be successful among low nostalgia prone individuals.

    “Schindler and Holbrook (2003) stated that since nostalgic appeals evoking the past may not be successful among the low nostalgia prone individuals, they recommend that more progressive appeals need to be used which could evoke the heritage of the product or brand but also cue modernity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schindler and Holbrook (2003)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The most discrete emotions occur in response to appraisals of events happening to persons or experiences they have.

    “Roseman et al. (1990) have demonstrated that the most discrete emotions occur in response to appraisals of events happening to persons or experiences they have.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roseman et al. (1990) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The 'Thank you' note that the NPO sends to the donor may act as the confirmation of the donor's role in participating in the story.

    “The”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The NPO brand tells the donor a story.

    “In the context of NPOs, it can also be argued that the NPO brand tells the donor a story (e.g. World Christian Fund, Operation Smile etc).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In charitable giving, appeals that generate negative emotions and urge donors to help are likely to take the donor through different emotional stages: emotions preceding giving, anticipated by giving, and experienced after giving.

    “In the context of charitable giving, appeals that generate negative emotions (e.g.figure 5-2) and urge donors to help are likely to take the donor through different emotional stagesemotions preceding giving to charity, the emotions anticipated by giving and the emotions experienced after giving to charity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
97 of 97
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has linked personal nostalgia to charitable giving.

    “The author has not found any study that has linked personal nostalgia to giving to charity.”
    “However, we are not aware of any research that has been done to understand the relationship between the experience of nostalgia and charitable giving and the factors that influence this relationship.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has comprehensively examined the role of potential factors influencing nostalgia in the context of charitable giving.

    “Secondly, the author has also not found any study that has comprehensively looked at the role of the potential factors that influence nostalgia, and in particular the context of charitable giving would be a new and relevant dimension.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationship between recovery from grief and nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity has not been studied.

    “Though other researches have looked at this construct, how it relates to nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity is an area which has also not yet been studied by other researches in this area.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.

    “Hypothesis 1: This states that there is a positive causal link between Discontinuity and Personal Nostalgia.”
    “there is a significant causal link between Personal Nostalgia and Emotional Utility”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Respondents' self-reported donation behavior and psychological states are accurate.

    “The respondent was asked to furnish information such as the type of charitable organization he or she last donated money to, how many times in the past they had donated and which type of charitable organization he or she regularly donated money to”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The additional questions added to the Emotional Utility and Recovery from Grief scales validly capture the intended constructs.

    “The following statements were added to the Emotional Utility scale (Sargeant et al., 2007):”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The online consumer panel respondents are not systematically different from the target population of U.S. donors.

    “This panel was constructed and selected in line with the U.S. census.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The model assumes a single direction causal relationship between emotional engagement and commitment.

    “Fourthly, the model in this study assumes a single direction causal relationship between emotional engagement and commitment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Emotional utility and familial utility are extremely complex and are influenced by multiple other psychological constructs.

    “Since both the constructs (EU and FU) are extremely complex and are influenced by a multiple other psychological constructs the variance explained can be considered acceptable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are a host of other factors that influence personal nostalgia which have not been modeled in this study.

    “This also means that there are a host of other factors that influence personal nostalgia which have not been modeled in this study and can be opportunities of future researches in this area.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.

    “Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract claims an age effect that the results reject

    Major

    The abstract says age positively influences personal nostalgia, but the hypothesis results say the age effect is not significant.

  • Full-model nostalgia coefficients are assigned to the wrong outcomes

    Major

    The prose assigns 0.218 to emotional utility and 0.170 to familial utility. Table 4-12 assigns those estimates in the opposite order: 0.218 to familial utility (H6) and 0.170 to emotional utility (H7).

  • Listed measurement items total 61, not 63

    Minor

    The eight item counts listed for the measurement model add to 61, rather than the reported 63.

    Reported 63 · recomputed 61

  • Four-or-more donations are described as more than four

    Minor

    The reported 77.7% combines respondents who donated four times (4.2%) with those who donated more than four times (73.5%). The text describes the combined group as having donated over four times.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Belk, 1979, Gift giving behavior, vol. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Rose, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Merchant, Altaf
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
610-616
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066042777
Cited by
102
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Old Dominion University
Funders
Academy of Marketing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
personal nostalgia, charitable giving, donor commitments, grief recovery, loneliness, discontinuities, life experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review