How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 104 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change with time.
“Carnelly et al. (2006) found that the positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change with time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Carnelly et al. (2006) source
- Findingown data
The study found support for nine out of the ten hypothesized relationships.
“The study found support for nine out of the ten hypothesized relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No prior study has linked personal nostalgia to charitable giving.
- Rests on an assumption: No prior study has comprehensively examined the role of potential factors influencing nostalgia in the context of charitable giving.
- Rests on an assumption: The relationship between recovery from grief and nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity has not been studied.
- Findingown data
At the aggregate sample level, there were no significant differences in mean scores between donors who received a thank you note and those who did not.
“However, at an aggregate sample level there were no significant differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aging does not have a significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=-0.071, t=-1.585, not significant).
“Contrary to what was hypothesized, this study found that Aging does not have a significant impact on Personal Nostalgia, hence hypothesis 4 is not supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Findingown data
Loneliness has a positive significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=0.151, t=3.148, p<0.01; reduced model: beta=0.227, t=4.508, p<0.001).
“The path coefficient = 0.151, (t=3.148) is significant at pO.Ol.Therefore, hypothesis 3 is supported.”
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · boosted
“The findings of this study confirmed that loneliness has a significant impact on Personal Nostalgia (path coefficient =0.227, t=4.508, pO.OOl).Therefore, hypothesis 3 is supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · boosted
- Findingown data
Discontinuity has a positive significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=0.261, t=5.462, p<0.001).
“The path coefficient = 0.261, (t=5.462) is significant at p<0.001 (see Table 456789101112).Therefore, HI is supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Findingown data
This study explains 15.1% of the variance in personal nostalgia.
“Secondly, this study explains 15.1% of the variance in personal nostalgia.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“This model explains 15.1% of the variance in personal nostalgia.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Thus it means that the variance exogenous variables (such as discontinuity, aging, loneliness etc) that lead to personal nostalgia together explain 15.1% of the variance of personal nostalgia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
- Findingown data
Among frequent donors (donated 4 times or more), there was no difference in engagement between those who received a thank you note and those who did not.
“There was no difference in the frequent donor group among those who received a thanks note versus those who did not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Past experiences associated with the NPO have a positive significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=0.134, t=2.698, p<0.01; reduced model: beta=0.159, t=3.154, p<0.01).
“The path coefficient =0.134, (t=2.698) is also significant at p<0.01 and thus hypothesis 2 is supported (see Table 456789101112).”
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
“The path coefficient =0.159, (t=3.154) is also significant at p<0.01 and thus hypothesis 2 is supported (see Table 4567891011121314).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
- Findingown data
Recovery from Grief has a positive significant effect on Personal Nostalgia (full model: beta=0.191, t=3.338, p<0.001; reduced model: beta=0.228, t=3.926, p<0.001).
“The path coefficient =0.191, (t=3.338) is significant at p<0.001 and thus hypothesis 5 is supported.”
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
“this study found that Recovery from Grief does have a significant and positive impact on Personal Nostalgia (Table 4-14) and thus hypothesis 5 is supported (path coefficient =0.228, t=3.926, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
- Findingown data
Personal Nostalgia has a positive significant effect on Emotional Utility (full model: beta=0.218, t=3.611, p<0.001; reduced model: beta=0.170, t=3.326, p<0.001).
“there is a significant causal link between Personal Nostalgia and Emotional Utility (path coefficient =0.218, t=3.611) is significant at p<0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
“there is a significant causal link between Personal Nostalgia and Emotional Utility (path coefficient =0.170, t=3.326, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
- Also stated in: § Hypothesis 3: · plain
- Findingown data
Among infrequent donors (donated 3 times or less), there was a significant difference between those who were thanked and those who were not.
“This showed that there was significant difference among those who said that they were thanked versus those who were not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Commitment of the donor has a significant positive effect on Intention to Donate.
“Hypothesis 10: It was argued that the Commitment of the donor results in Intention to Donate.As per Table 4-12, this path coefficient =0.865, (t=l4.079) is significant at p<0.001.Hence we can say that as the Commitment to the NPO increases the Intention to Donate to the NPO also increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 4-12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The greater the emotional engagement derived through personal nostalgia, the greater the commitment to the NPO that is evoking nostalgia.
“The findings of this study show that the greater the emotional engagement derived through personal nostalgia the greater the commitment to the NPO that is evoking nostalgia (Hypothese 8 and 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among infrequent donors, mean scores of emotional utility, intention to donate, amount donated, and commitment were significantly higher among those who were thanked compared to those who were not.
“The mean scores of emotional utility, intention to donate, amount donated and commitment was significantly higher among those who were thanked when compared to those who were not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The structural model with all constructs has fit indices X2(771)=1626, x2/df=2.10, CFI=0.91, IFI=0.91, TLI=0.91, GFI=0.86, RMSEA=0.047.
“Model diagnostics X2(771) = 1626,x2/df=2.10,CFI=0.91,IFI=0.91,TLI=0.91,GFI=0.86,RMSEA=0.047** significant at p<0.001 * significant atp<0.01”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The revised model explains only 12.9% of the variance in personal nostalgia.
“The model now explains only 12.9% of the variance in personal nostalgia (see Table 4-15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Donors who are experiencing discontinuity, loneliness and are recovering from grief are more likely to feel nostalgic (Hypotheses 1,3 and 5).
“The results of this research show that donor's who are experiencing discontinuity, loneliness and are recovering from grief are more likely to feel nostalgic (Hypotheses 1,3 and 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Charities that engage the giver emotionally create stronger commitment from the giver.
“In a recent study, Sargeant et al. (2006) have shown that charities which engage the giver emotionally are able to create stronger commitment from the giver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
- Premisecitation
People who are more nostalgia prone are more likely to be stirred by nostalgic communications.
“People who are more nostalgia prone are more likely to be stirred by nostalgic communications (Batcho, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Batcho, 1998 source
- Premisecitation
When people feel lonely they tend to get nostalgic.
“When people feel lonely they tend to get nostalgic as the past acts as a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lomsky-Feder and Rapoport, 2000 source
- Premisecitation
Those committed to an NPO are more likely to give to that NPO.
“Those who are committed to the NPO are more likely to give to the NPO.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
- Premisecitation
People cope with grief by developing continual bonds with the deceased person by remembering the past.
“The person copes with grief by developing continual bonds with the deceased person by remembering the past (Bonnano and Kaltman, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bonnano and Kaltman, 1999 source
- Premisecitation
U.S. philanthropic institutions have found it increasingly difficult to raise needed funds from givers.
“Charitable organizations in the U.S. have found it increasingly difficult to raise funds from donors.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Philanthropic institutions in the U.S. have found it increasingly difficult to raise needed funds from givers (Eikenberry, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eikenberry, 2005 source
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
- Premisecitation
There has been a decline in the number of donors/givers in the U.S.
“With a decline in the number of donors”
- Also stated in: § GIVING BEHAVIOR · plain
“there has been a decline in the number of givers (Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § GIVING BEHAVIOR · plain
- Premisecitation
People feel nostalgic for more significant past experiences than less significant past experiences.
“Hence, people feel nostalgic for more significant past experiences than less significant past experiences (Baumgartner, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baumgartner, 1992
- Premisecitation
As people age they get more nostalgic.
“As people age they get more nostalgic (Davis, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis, 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Individuals give less than 2% of their personal income to charities.
“It has been shown that individuals give less than 2% of their personal income to charities (Burke, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burke, 2001 source
- Interpretationcitation
Getting nostalgic for a loved one who is dead allows them to cope with the loss and the grief involved with the death.
“Thus, one can argue that getting nostalgic for a loved one who is dead allows them to cope with the loss and the grief involved with the death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The degree of personal association with the cause affects commitment to the cause.
“The degree of personal association with the cause affects the commitment to the cause (Sargeant and Lee, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant and Lee, 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Stimulating a consumer's memory can make them feel the emotions they felt when they had the original experience.
“Research has shown that by stimulating the consumer's memory, they can be made to feel the emotions they felt when they had the original experience (Braun-Latour and Latour, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Braun-Latour and Latour, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
A review of the literature did not show any scales which measure the presence of significant life events associated with a charity in question.
“Since a review of the literature did not show any scales which measure the presence of significant life events associated with a charity in question, the measures used by Schukind et al. (1999) and Baumgartner (1992) were utilized in this study (Table 3-2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The more intense the past experience, the stronger the memories associated with that experience.
“The more intense the past experience, the stronger the memories associated with that experience (Baumgartner, 1992;Holbrook, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baumgartner, 1992;Holbrook, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
People experiencing discontinuity tend to become nostalgic.
“People experiencing discontinuity tend to become nostalgic (Davis 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Non-givers give when they feel a genuine interest and identification with the cause.
“The important opportunity for non-profit managers is that non-givers have been found to give when they feel a genuine interest and identification with the cause (Sargeant and Jay, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant and Jay, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
As people age, they develop a preference for bygone days.
“Certainly as people age, they develop a preference for bygone days (Davis, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis, 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
By providing stimuli that remind consumers of days gone by, marketers can evoke emotions of the past that consumers are hoping for.
“By providing stimuli to consumers which remind them of days gone by, marketers can evoke emotions of the past which the consumers are hoping for.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The person experiencing personal nostalgia remembers things and events more positively than they actually were.
“The person experiencing personal nostalgia remembers things and events more positively than they actually were.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bricklin, 2001;Stern, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Events which have been more intense or more significant are retained (hence, more vivid) in the autobiographical memory more than less intense and less important events.
“Events which have been more intense or more significant are retained (hence, more vivid) in the autobiographical memory more than less intense and less important events (Sehulster, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sehulster, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The nostalgic experience is bittersweet, comprising both positive and negative emotions.
“The nostalgic experience is not comprised of all positive emotions; it is a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Davis, 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Holak and Havlena, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Personal nostalgia helps in the grieving process as it aids in recovery from the grief.
“Therefore, one can argue that it helps in the grieving process as it aids in recovery from the grief.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Some individuals show higher propensities for nostalgia than others.
“Some individuals show higher propensities for nostalgia than others (Holbrook, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holbrook, 1993 source
- Interpretationreasoning
In a charitable giving context, when thinking of one's loved ones, the individual is likely to feel a personal affinity for the people being remembered.
“In a charitable giving context, when thinking of one's loved ones, the individual is likely to feel a personal affinity for the people being remembered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Specific memories are more likely to involve mental imagery than general memories.
“Research has shown (Williams et al., 1999) that specific memories are more likely to involve mental imagery than general memories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al., 1999 source
- Interpretationcitation
This personal affinity should motivate the individual to donate to a charity in memoriam.
“This personal affinity should motivate the individual to donate to a charity in memoriam (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
- Premisecitation
People who are more prone to nostalgia are more open to nostalgic appeals, branding strategies and advertising.
“Therefore, people who are more prone to nostalgia are more open to nostalgic appeals, branding strategies and advertising (Zimmer et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zimmer et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
It was common for the bereaved to think about their loved one almost daily in the first six months but this dropped down to around four times a week 18 months after the death.
“Bonnano et al. (2004) found that it was common for the bereaved to think about their loved one almost daily in the first six months but this dropped down to around four times a week 18 months after the death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bonnano et al. (2004)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Individuals in the high nostalgia group perceive the past as more favorable than those in the low nostalgia group.
“Individuals in the high nostalgia group were found to perceive the past as more favorable than those in the low nostalgia group (Batcho, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Batcho, 1998 source
- Interpretationown data
Individuals tend to get nostalgic about past experiences associated with the charitable organization.
“As hypothesized, it means that individuals tend to get nostalgic about past experiences associated with the charitable organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The high frequency of prior donations implies that respondents had a relationship with the charitable organization.
“This implies that they had a relationship with the charitable organization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The author found no prior research studying the relationship between personal nostalgia and charitable giving.
“The author has not found any research which has studied the relationship between personal nostalgia and charitable giving.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The emotional utility and familial utility that the donor derives from personal nostalgia associated with the charitable organization result in higher levels of commitment to the charitable organization.
“This means that the emotional utility and the familial utility that the donor derives out of the personal nostalgia associated with the charitable organization results in higher levels of commitment the donor has to the charitable organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The measurement model demonstrates reasonable levels of fit (x2 (674) =1228, x2/df=1.82, CFI=0.94, IFI=0.94, TLI=0.94, GFI=0.89, RMSEA=0.041).
“As shown in Table 4-10, the measurement model demonstrates reasonable levels of fit (x2 (674) =1228, %2 /df=l .82,CFI=0.94,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.94,GFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.041) to the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 4-10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Among infrequent donors, thanking helps increase engagement.
“Thus, it appears that among infrequent donors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
All income groups were represented in the sample.
“All income groups were represented in the sample (see Table 4-2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Recovery from grief had not been studied in the context of nostalgia before this study.
“some of which (e.g.recovery from grief) had not been studied in the context of nostalgia so far.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The author found no prior study comprehensively examining the factors that influence nostalgia.
“The author has not found any study that has comprehensively looked at the role of the factors that influence nostalgia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The structural model shows reasonably good fit (x2 (771) = 1626, x2/df=2.10, CFI=0.91, IFI=0.91, TLI=0.91, GFI=0.86, RMSEA=0.047).
“The structural model shows reasonably good fit (%2 (771) = 1626, x2/df=2.10,CFI=0.91,IFI=0.91,TLI=0.91,GFI=0.86,RMSEA=0.047).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There was a balance between male and female respondents.
“There was also a balance between male and female respondents (Table 4-3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
All constructs had acceptable Cronbach's Alpha coefficients (e.g., Personal Nostalgia 0.88, Emotional Utility 0.88, Intention To Donate 0.90, Loneliness 0.89, Commitment 0.82, Recovery from Grief 0.85).
“Reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient.All the constructs had acceptable Alpha coefficient (E.g.Personal Nostalgia -0.88, Emotional Utility -0.88, Intention To Donate -0.90, Loneliness -0.89, Commitment -0.82, Recovery from Grief-0.85 etc).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The mix of charitable organizations and gift size enhances the generalizability of the study findings.
“This mix of charitable organizations and gift size also enhances the generalizability of the study findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sample had a good mix of charitable organizations represented.
“In summary, there was a good mix of charitable organizations represented in the sample (Table 456).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The Morgan and Hunt (1994) commitment scale adapted by Sargeant et al. (2006) demonstrated reasonably good reliability (alpha=0.76).
“The scale demonstrated a reasonably good reliability (a = 0.76).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The Sargeant et al. (2006) Emotional Utility and Familial Utility scales have weak but acceptable reliabilities (EU alpha=0.68, FU alpha=0.73).
“The Cronbach Alpha for EU was 0.68 and the Cronbach Alpha for FU was 0.73.These reliabilities are seen as weak but acceptable (Churchill, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
A thanks note did not drive engagement among frequent donors.
“It appears that a thanks note did not drive engagement to this group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Consumers differ in their propensity to be nostalgic.
“Personal nostalgia literature (Holbrook, 1993, Batcho, 1995) shows that consumers differ in their propensity to be nostalgic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 65
- May combine two claims. 48
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Batcho (1995) Personal Nostalgia Inventory has good reliability (split-half r=0.78, p<.01; test-retest r=0.84, p<.01; Wildschut et al. (2006) alpha=0.88).
“Using the split half method she found that the scale had good reliability (r=0.78,p<.01).Using test retest method (administering this scale to the same individual twice, using an interval of one week), she found good correlation between the average rating across the twenty items (r=0.84,p<.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Batcho (1995) source
- cites Wildschut et al. (2006) source
The Manipulation check section (p. 22) reports α = .88 for Wildschut et al.’s administration of Batcho’s Nostalgia Inventory, supporting that part of the claim. Our copy does not report the cited split-half correlation (r = .78) or one-week test–retest correlation (r = .84). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPositive emotions evoked by memories of the deceased do not change over time, while the frequency of negative-emotion thoughts decreases over time but the frequency of pleasantness thoughts does not.
“Carnelly et al. (2006) found that the positive emotions that were evoked with the memories of the deceased did not change over time.Even though the frequency of thoughts that resulted in negative emotions decreased over time, the frequency of thoughts that resulted in pleasantness did not decrease over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Carnelly et al. (2006) source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe statistical tests found support for nine of the ten research hypotheses.
“Structural equation model was run and the statistical tests found support for nine of the research hypotheses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility and 4.8% of the variance of familial utility.
“This model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility and 4.8% of the variance of familial utility, which are both small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model explains 43.7% of the variance of commitment and 74.7% of the variance in the intention to donate.
“Finally, this model explains 43.7% of the variance of commitment and 74.7%) of the variance in the intention to donate, which are both large.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe other endogenous constructs were impacted less significantly than personal nostalgia by eliminating Aging and Discontinuity.
“The other endogenous constructs were impacted less significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe revised model with eight latent constructs (eliminating Aging and Discontinuity) shows reasonably good fit: X2(694)=1410, X2/df=2.03, CFI=0.92, IFI=0.93, TLI=0.92, GFI=0.87, RMSEA=0.045.
“The structural model shows reasonably good fit (%2 (694) = 1410, X 2/df=2.03,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.93,TLI=0.92,GFI=0.87,RMSEA=0.045).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe revised model explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility, 5% of the variance of familial utility, 43.8% of the variance of commitment and 74.8% of the variance in the intention to donate.
“The model now explains 2.9% of the variance in emotional utility, 5% of the variance of familial utility, 43.8% of the variance of commitment and 74.8% of the variance in the intention to donate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe path coefficients for H8, H9, H10 are 0.279, 0.590, 0.865 respectively, and are significant.
“H8 H9 H10 0.279 0.590 0.865 ** significant at p<0.001 4.910** 10.472** 14.089** * significant atp<0.01”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPerceived demonstrable benefits associated with charitable giving help persuade non-donors to become donors.
“The perceived demonstrable benefits (selfish gains like invitations to gala events (Kottasz, 2004)) associated with charitable giving helps to persuade non-donors to become donors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPersonal nostalgia involves warmth and joy from remembering the past and a sense of loss that the past is no more.
“There is the warmth and the joy arising out of remembering the past but there is also a sense of loss that the past is no more (Holak and Havlena, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holak and Havlena, 1998 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPeople facing discontinuous life experiences tend to get more nostalgic and look to the past for stability.
“Those that face discontinuous life experiences tend to get more nostalgic and look to the past for a sense of stability (Mehta and Belk, 1991).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehta and Belk, 1991 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSargeant et al. (2006) summarized intrinsic determinants of giving under three categories: familial utility, emotional utility, and demonstrable utility.
“Sargeant et al. (2006) summarized the intrinsic determinants of giving under three categories: familial utility (benefits to family members either alive or in memoriam), emotional utility (emotions felt) and demonstrable utility (a direct economic benefit accruing to the giver like the chance to attend a performance, dinner, event etc).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPerceived demonstrable benefits do not impact commitment nor trust in the charitable organization.
“However, it does not impact commitment nor does it impact trust in the charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBaby boomers are aging and becoming increasingly nostalgic.
“Since baby boomers are aging, they are becoming increasingly nostalgic (Unger et al., 1991)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Unger et al., 1991 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNPOs that give donors a window to experience personal nostalgia are likely to benefit through stronger bonds with current donors and by attracting nongivers.
“NPOs that give the donor a window to experience personal nostalgia are likely to benefit through the creation of stronger bonds with current donors and by attracting nongivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNostalgia evokes a poignant mixture of mental pain and joy.
“It evokes a poignant mixture of mental pain and joy (Freud, 1926;Akhtar, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Freud, 1926
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Akhtar, 1996 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigher emotional utility and familial utility lead to greater commitment and greater giving to that charitable organization.
“The higher the emotional utility (emotions felt out of giving) and familial utility (link to family), the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that would be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSargeant et al. (2006) suggest familial utility may be affected by nostalgia because desire for the situation experienced when a loved one was alive may influence giving in memory of that loved one.
“Sargeant et al. (2006) suggest that familial utility may actually be affected by nostalgia since desire for the situation experienced or perceived to have been experienced when a loved one was still alive may influence giving in memory of that loved one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationU.K. charities have also found it increasingly difficult to raise funds over the past 10 years.
“Over the past 10 years charities in the U.K. have also been finding it increasingly difficult to raise funds (Sargeant et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2000 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNostalgia evokes a variety of emotions.
“Academic work involving nostalgia has shown it to evoke a variety of emotions (Davis, 1979;Gardener, 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Davis, 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gardener, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNostalgia can be a longing for a past not personally experienced, a 'lost past paradise'.
“it also represents a longing for a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peters, 1985 source
- cites Stern, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNostalgia affects old and young alike.
“Nostalgia has been found to affect old and young alike (McCann, 1941)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCann, 1941 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is increasing use of nostalgia in the marketing of consumer goods.
“There is an increasing use of nostalgia in the marketing of consumer goods (Baker and Kennedy, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker and Kennedy, 1994
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSargeant et al. (2006) proposed a perceptual model of donor giving behavior showing significant linkages between emotional utility, familial utility and commitment, which drives donor giving.
“Recently, Sargeant et al. (2006) proposed a perceptual model of donor giving behavior which showed significant linkages between such perceptual dimensions as emotional utility (giving to feel better about oneself), familial utility (giving connected to a family member affected by the cause associated with the charity) and commitment which in turn was found to drive donor giving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere has been an increase in the number of charitable organizations.
“Thirdly, there has been an increase in the number of charitable organizations (Sargeant et al., 2000)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2000 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost charitable giving is done by older adults, while the younger generation is less motivated to give.
“What is apparent in an examination of this literature is that most of the charitable giving is done by older adults (Mathur, 1996;Pharoah and Tanner, 1997), while the younger generation is less motivated to give (Sargeant et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrust and commitment drive giving behavior.
“Trust and commitment also drive giving behavior (Sargeant and Lee, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant and Lee, 2004 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeveloping continued bonds with the deceased is one means of coping with death and fosters continuity of identity.
“Bonnano and Kaltman (1999) argued that one of the means for coping with the death of an individual is to develop”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bonnano and Kaltman (1999) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmotional engagement is key to donor commitment, and emotionally engaged donors are more likely to give to charity.
“Emotional engagement is key to donor commitment, and donors who are emotionally engaged are more likely to give to charity (Sarganet et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sarganet et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Life Experiences Survey was tested among 345 respondents by Sarason et al. and was found to exhibit a reliability of 0.88 for the effect of negative events in life.
“This was tested among 345 respondents by Sarason et al. (1978) and was found to exhibit a reliability of 0.88 for the effect of negative events in life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sarason et al. (1978) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPersonal nostalgia is influenced by many factors, including discontinuity, past experiences, loneliness, age and the recovery from grief.
“Personal nostalgia is influenced by many factors.They include discontinuity, past experiences, loneliness, age and the recovery from grief.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs people aged they got more nostalgic and remembered the times of their youth with considerable nostalgia as they entered older stages in life.
“For example, Batcho (1995) found that as people aged they got more nostalgic and remembered the times of their youth with considerable nostalgia as they entered older stages in life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Batcho (1995) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAmong both younger and older adults loneliness is linked to negative affects including boredom, unhappiness, and dissatisfaction.
“Among both younger and older adults loneliness is linked to negative affects including boredom, unhappiness, and dissatisfaction (Perlman, Gerson, and Spinner, 1978).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perlman, Gerson, and Spinner, 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPersonal nostalgia serves as an anchor of continuity and identity during changing circumstances in life.
“It serves as an anchor of continuity and identity (Mehta and Belk, 1991) during changing circumstances in life (Noble and Walker, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mehta and Belk, 1991 source
- cites Noble and Walker, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCommitment and trust are vital to create and maintain relationships.
“For this to happen, it is proposed that commitment and trust are vital to create and maintain relationships (Morgan and Hunt, 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morgan and Hunt, 1994 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe recall of the past leads to the evoking of both happy and sad emotions.
“The recall of the past leads to the evoking of both happy and sad emotions (Bernsten and Rubin, 2002;Holak and Havlena, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bernsten and Rubin, 2002;Holak and Havlena, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNostalgia is evoked by a variety of triggers.
“Nostalgia is evoked by a variety of triggers (Holbrook and Schindler, 2003;Schindler and Holbrook, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Holbrook and Schindler, 2003 source
- cites Schindler and Holbrook, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationImagery plays an important role in reliving past experiences.
“Maclnnis and Price (1987) stated that imagery plays an important role in reliving past experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maclnnis and Price, 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPersonal nostalgia helps to alleviate feelings of loneliness.
“It also helps to alleviate feelings of loneliness (Lomsky-Feder and Rapoport, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lomsky-Feder and Rapoport, 2000 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy making a donation in the memory of the deceased, the giver remembers the loved one and is provided a sense of continuity.
“Therefore, it appears that by making a donation in the memory of the deceased, the giver remembers the loved one and is provided a sense of continuity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are three phases of grief.
“A review of the literature on grief shows that there are three phases of grief (Goalder, 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goalder, 1985 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCharitable giving is affected by commitment, which in turn is affected by trust and by emotional and familial utility, which are intrinsic, while trust is driven by organizational elements such as organizational professionalism and quality of communications, which are extrinsic.
“Looking to the work of Sargeant et al. (2006), charitable giving is affected by commitment, which in turn is affected by trust and by emotional and familial utility, which are intrinsic, while trust is driven by organizational elements such as organizational professionalism and quality of communications, which are extrinsic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al. (2006) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe higher the emotional utility and familial utility, the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that will be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization.
“The higher the emotional utility and familial utility, the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that will be exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe personal nostalgia experience involves recalling experiences of the past and feeling the emotions of nostalgia.
“The personal nostalgia experience involves recalling experiences of the past and feeling the emotions of nostalgia (Holak and Havlena, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holak and Havlena, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale was tested among 237 individuals and demonstrated good reliability (Alpha = 0.94).
“Russell et al. (1980) tested this scale among 237 individuals and it demonstrated good reliability (Alpha = 0.94).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Russell et al. (1980) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMen and women have different triggers for nostalgia.
“Researchers have also found that men and women have different triggers for nostalgia (Baker and Kennedy, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker and Kennedy, 1994
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn the context of giving to charity, NPOs that can assure continuity for donors facing discontinuity are likely to provide emotional benefits to the giver.
“It is argued that in the context of giving to charity NPOs that can assure continuity for donors facing discontinuity are likely to provide emotional benefits to the giver.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRemembering the past makes a person feel warmth, joy and affection, but also sadness and loss that the past cannot be recreated.
“By remembering the past, the person feels warmth, joy and affection (Holak and Havlena, 1998), but at the same time, there is a feeling of sadness and loss with the realization that the past cannot be recreated.(Holak and Havlena, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holak and Havlena, 1998 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe Psychological Screening Inventory (Lanyon, 1970) is overly lengthy and was developed to measure psychiatric disorders, making it inappropriate for measuring loneliness in this study.
“The Psychological Screening Inventory (1970) is a 130item scale which measures alienation, social non conformity and discomfort.The focus of this scale was on measuring these conditions among those who face major psychiatric disorder.Since this scale is overly lengthy and was developed to measure psychiatric disorders, it was felt to be inappropriate for use in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lanyon (1970) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis study only retained the items of positive emotions for emotional utility.
“This study only retained the items of positive emotions, future studies could also look at the role of negative emotions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data77.7% of respondents had donated to that charitable organization over four times ever before.
“In terms of the number of times the respondents had donated to that charitable organization, 77.7% of the respondents in the sample indicated that they had given to that charitable organization over four times ever before (Table 45678).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data84% of respondents had done some college education or more.
“The respondents in the sample were educated, 84% having done some college education or more (Table 45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAs individuals get lonely, they tend to think of the past and get nostalgic and fondly remember the days of the past.
“This implies that as individuals get lonely they tend to think of the past and tend to get nostalgic and fondly remember the days of the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model does a reasonably good job explaining and performs satisfactorily.
“The fit looks reasonably good, and we can say that the model does a reasonably good job explaining, so the indications are that the model performs satisfactorily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data70.9% of respondents had made their last donations less than three months ago.
“In fact 70.9% of the respondents had made their donations less than three months ago (Table 456789).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataData checks indicated no major issues and the data appeared balanced.
“The check indicated that there were no major issues and the data appeared balanced.The data was also eyeballed for any issues on the respondent's demographic profile.The initial analysis showed that there were no major issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe racial profile of the respondents was skewed more towards Caucasians.
“The racial profile of the respondents was skewed more towards Caucasians (Table 4-4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThere are other factors that also influence personal nostalgia.
“It is evident there are other factors which also influence personal nostalgia and future studies may focus on capturing them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe balanced demographic profile of the sample enhances the generalizability of the study findings.
“The balanced demographic profile of the sample was encouraging as it enhances the generalizability of the study findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Batcho (1995) scale measures proneness to be nostalgic but does not measure the intensity of the personal nostalgia the respondent is experiencing.
“Firstly, this research uses the Batcho (1995) scale to measure the proneness to be nostalgic, but it does not measure the intensity of the personal nostalgia the respondent is experiencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Batcho (1995) source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFamilial Utility had a relatively low reliability (alpha=0.61) and no item deletion improved its alpha.
“In this analysis, loadings with standardized factor construct which had a relatively low reliability was Familial Utility (a=0.61).Additional analysis was run for the increase/decrease in the Cronbach's Alpha if any of the scale items were dropped for the items of familial utility.The analysis showed that there was no opportunity to increase the alpha as there was a drop in the alpha if any of the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline consumer panel surveys can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys, are cheaper and less time consuming, and are a viable alternative for high-quality research.
“Braunsberger et al. (2007) found that survey data collected from an online consumer panel to be of good quality.They collected data from two waves of telephone surveys and web-panel surveys.They found that web panels can produce more reliable data estimates than telephone surveys.They also found that, web panels were cheaper and less time consuming to conduct than telephone surveys.They state that”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Braunsberger et al. (2007) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are scales that measure the proneness or propensity for an individual to be nostalgic.
“A review of the nostalgia literature has shown that there are scales that measure the proneness or propensity for an individual to be nostalgic (Holbrook, 1993, Batcho, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe agency returned completed responses from 502 consumers who had donated money to charity in the last 12 months.
“The agency returned completed responses from 502 consumers who had donated money to charity in the last 12 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs individuals experience discontinuity, they are likely to get nostalgic for the past because the past gives them a sense of security.
“As hypothesized, this means that as individuals experience discontinuity they are likely to get nostalgic for the past, as the past gives them a sense of security.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThinking of a deceased loved one likely makes the bereaved nostalgic about that person, which helps recovery from grief by maintaining continual bonds.
“Therefore, one can argue that while thinking of the loved one, the bereaved remembers the loved one and it is likely that he or she will get nostalgic about that person.This helps the recovery from grief, as the griever feels that he or she has continual bonds with the deceased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Ranganathan and Henley (2007) intention to donate scale showed good reliability (alpha=0.89) among 214 individuals.
“Ranganathan and Henley (2007) tested the four item intention to donate scale (Table 3-8) among 214 individuals and it showed good reliability (a=0.89).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ranganathan and Henley (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Holbrook (1993) nostalgia scale is not a good measure of personal nostalgia because it primarily measures vicarious nostalgia.
“In fact Batcho (1998) argues that if we eliminate the items with small loadings, the Holbrook (1993) scale really only measures vicarious nostalgia.Hence, she argues that the Holbrook (1993) scale is not a good measure of personal nostalgia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhen remembering a deceased friend or relative, individuals get nostalgic about the times spent with the deceased loved one; as people cope with death, they seek solace in memories and get nostalgic.
“This supports the arguments made by this study that when remembering the deceased friend or relative, individuals get nostalgic about the times they have spent with the deceased loved one.As people cope with the death of a loved one they seek solace in the memories of the deceased and get nostalgic for the days spent with the deceased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe current study used cross-sectional data.
“Lastly, the current study used cross sectional data, future researches may want to use experimental design to test the impact of nostalgic appeals on charitable giving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOf 905 respondents who answered the first question, 505 (56%) qualified as having donated to charity in the last 12 months and continued the survey; 3 were removed for missing values.
“For the current project 905 respondents answered the first question and then 505 (56%) qualified as having donated to charity in the last 12 months and continued the entire survey (3 respondents were removed from the data for having missing values).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe tested model shows that life stage factors (discontinuity, loneliness, recovery from grief, past experiences with charity) influence personal nostalgia, which provides emotional and familial utility, increasing commitment and intention to donate.
“This research has found that fife stage factors like: the discontinuity the donor is experiencing, the extent to which the donor is feeling lonely, recovering from grief, along with whether the donor has significant past experiences associated with the charity influence the donor's personal nostalgia.The donor's personal nostalgia in turn provides emotional utility and familial utility to the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe sample had a balanced age breakdown with a mean age of 51 years.
“A detailed analysis of the respondents showed that there was a balanced age break down on age (see Table 4-1).The average age of the respondents was 51 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe reliabilities of the latent constructs were: Intention to Donate 0.90, Commitment 0.82, Emotional Utility 0.88, Familial Utility 0.61, Personal Nostalgia 0.88, Loneliness 0.89.
“Construct Intention to Donate Reliability (a): 0.90 Commitment Reliability (a): 0.82 Emotional Utility Reliability (a): 0.88 Familial Utility Reliability (a): 0.61 Personal Nostalgia Reliability (a): 0.88 Loneliness Reliability (a) : 0.89”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWeb-based consumer panels enable researchers to collect data from a wide range and types of participants.
“Fielding (2007) recognizes web based consumer panels for enabling researchers to leverage technology to collect data from a wide range and types of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fielding (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigher emotional utility and familial utility lead to greater commitment and greater giving to the charitable organization.
“The higher the emotional utility (emotions felt out of giving) and familial utility (link to family), the greater the degree of commitment and the greater the level of giving that is exhibited by the donor to that charitable organization (Sargeant et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sargeant et al., 2006 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe sample profile analysis confirmed the data was not skewed and had a good spread, so findings would be generalizable to the population.
“This analysis would help confirm that the data was not skewed.The sample was also analyzed for donation behavior.The amount donated, the type of charitable organization donated to and the frequency of donation to the concerned charitable organization was to be examined.This helped reconfirm that the data had a good spread and thus the findings would be generalizable to the population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe median gift amount was $40, with 46% donating less than $25 and 14% donating more than $150.
“The median gift amount was $40, with 46% of the respondents indicating donations of less than $25 and 14% with relatively large amounts (more than $150).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe model takes intention to donate as the proxy for giving behavior.
“Thirdly, this model takes the intention to donate as the proxy for giving behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPersonal nostalgia results in emotional benefits for the donor and emotional engagement in the charitable giving context.
“Thus, as argued in chapter three, personal nostalgia results in emotional benefits for the donor.This finding is key as it confirms that even in the charitable giving context personal nostalgia results in emotional engagement with the donors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis study did not study the influence of personal nostalgia on the emotional engagement of non donors.
“Sixthly, this study did not study the influence of personal nostalgia on the emotional engagement of non donors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe number of donors declined by 1.3% in 2006 over 2005 and by 1.7% in the first half of 2007 over 2006.
“As per the Index of National Fundraising Performance of the Target Analysis Group (Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007) the number of donors has declined by 1.3% in 2006 over 2005 and by 1.7% in the first half of 2007 over 2006.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs per Cohen (1992), in models using multiple independent variables, an effect size of 2% is considered small, around 15% is considered medium and 35% or more is considered large.
“As per Cohen (1992), in models using multiple independent variables, an effect size of 2% is considered small, around 15% is considered medium and 35% or more is considered large.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen (1992) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThese scales do not measure the intensity of the cognitive and emotional elements of the experience of personal nostalgia.
“However, these scales do not measure the intensity of the cognitive and emotional elements of the experience of personal nostalgia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHigh nostalgia prone consumers are more open to nostalgia appeals than low nostalgia prone individuals.
“Holbrook and Schindler (1991) concluded that high nostalgia prone consumers are more open to nostalgia appeals than low nostalgia prone individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holbrook and Schindler (1991)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNostalgia is just one type of time orientation, and there are five types of time orientation: past negative, past positive (nostalgia), present fatalistic, present hedonistic and future.
“a review of the psychology literature shows that nostalgia is just one type of time orientation and that there are five types of time orientation: past negative, past positive (nostalgia), present fatalistic, present hedonistic and future (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTime orientation influences how consumers think, act and behave, and influences values, behavior and emotions.
“Time orientation influences how consumers think, act and behave (Bergadaa 1990, Gonzalez andZimbardo, 1985), and influences values, behavior and emotions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bergadaa 1990 source
- cites Gonzalez andZimbardo, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThere is a positive impact of 'being acknowledged' by the NPO on the Donor's Lifetime Value.
“Bennett (2006) argues that there is a positive impact of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhen a person experiences a stimulus that makes him feel negative emotions, he would feel motivated to overcome the negative emotions.
“Thus it can be argued that when a person experiences stimulus that makes him feel negative emotions, he would feel motivated to overcome the negative emotions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPeople tend to maintain positive mood states and focus on moving away or changing their negative mood states.
“People tend to maintain positive mood states and focus on moving away or changing their negative mood states (Isen et al., 1987).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Isen et al., 1987 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrands tell stories and consumers want to be involved in these stories and want their roles reconfirmed.
“In the branding literature Woodside et al. (2008) state that brands tell stories and consumers want to be involved in these stories and want their roles reconfirmed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Woodside et al. (2008) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationNostalgic appeals evoking the past may not be successful among low nostalgia prone individuals.
“Schindler and Holbrook (2003) stated that since nostalgic appeals evoking the past may not be successful among the low nostalgia prone individuals, they recommend that more progressive appeals need to be used which could evoke the heritage of the product or brand but also cue modernity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schindler and Holbrook (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe most discrete emotions occur in response to appraisals of events happening to persons or experiences they have.
“Roseman et al. (1990) have demonstrated that the most discrete emotions occur in response to appraisals of events happening to persons or experiences they have.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roseman et al. (1990) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe 'Thank you' note that the NPO sends to the donor may act as the confirmation of the donor's role in participating in the story.
“The”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe NPO brand tells the donor a story.
“In the context of NPOs, it can also be argued that the NPO brand tells the donor a story (e.g. World Christian Fund, Operation Smile etc).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn charitable giving, appeals that generate negative emotions and urge donors to help are likely to take the donor through different emotional stages: emotions preceding giving, anticipated by giving, and experienced after giving.
“In the context of charitable giving, appeals that generate negative emotions (e.g.figure 5-2) and urge donors to help are likely to take the donor through different emotional stagesemotions preceding giving to charity, the emotions anticipated by giving and the emotions experienced after giving to charity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
No prior study has linked personal nostalgia to charitable giving.
“The author has not found any study that has linked personal nostalgia to giving to charity.”
“However, we are not aware of any research that has been done to understand the relationship between the experience of nostalgia and charitable giving and the factors that influence this relationship.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No prior study has comprehensively examined the role of potential factors influencing nostalgia in the context of charitable giving.
“Secondly, the author has also not found any study that has comprehensively looked at the role of the potential factors that influence nostalgia, and in particular the context of charitable giving would be a new and relevant dimension.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationship between recovery from grief and nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity has not been studied.
“Though other researches have looked at this construct, how it relates to nostalgia and its potential influence on giving to charity is an area which has also not yet been studied by other researches in this area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationships estimated in the structural model are causal.
“Hypothesis 1: This states that there is a positive causal link between Discontinuity and Personal Nostalgia.”
“there is a significant causal link between Personal Nostalgia and Emotional Utility”
The paper relies on this without support.
Respondents' self-reported donation behavior and psychological states are accurate.
“The respondent was asked to furnish information such as the type of charitable organization he or she last donated money to, how many times in the past they had donated and which type of charitable organization he or she regularly donated money to”
The paper relies on this without support.
The additional questions added to the Emotional Utility and Recovery from Grief scales validly capture the intended constructs.
“The following statements were added to the Emotional Utility scale (Sargeant et al., 2007):”
The paper relies on this without support.
The online consumer panel respondents are not systematically different from the target population of U.S. donors.
“This panel was constructed and selected in line with the U.S. census.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The model assumes a single direction causal relationship between emotional engagement and commitment.
“Fourthly, the model in this study assumes a single direction causal relationship between emotional engagement and commitment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Emotional utility and familial utility are extremely complex and are influenced by multiple other psychological constructs.
“Since both the constructs (EU and FU) are extremely complex and are influenced by a multiple other psychological constructs the variance explained can be considered acceptable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are a host of other factors that influence personal nostalgia which have not been modeled in this study.
“This also means that there are a host of other factors that influence personal nostalgia which have not been modeled in this study and can be opportunities of future researches in this area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.
“Sadness is frequently accompanied by feelings to be comforted.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract claims an age effect that the results reject
MajorThe abstract says age positively influences personal nostalgia, but the hypothesis results say the age effect is not significant.
“It shows that age, discontinuity, loneliness, past experiences and recovery from grief positively influence the donor's personal nostalgia.”
“Hypothesis 4: Contrary to what was hypothesized, this study found that Aging does not have a significant impact on Personal Nostalgia, hence hypothesis 4 is not supported.”
Full-model nostalgia coefficients are assigned to the wrong outcomes
MajorThe prose assigns 0.218 to emotional utility and 0.170 to familial utility. Table 4-12 assigns those estimates in the opposite order: 0.218 to familial utility (H6) and 0.170 to emotional utility (H7).
“Personal Nostalgia and Emotional Utility (path coefficient =0.218, t=3.611) is significant at p<0.001) and Personal Nostalgia and Familial Utility (path coefficient = 0.170, t=3.314) is significant at p<0.001).”
“Between Endogenous Variables Personal Nostalgia-* Familial Utility Personal Nostalgia-* Emotional Utility Familial Utility-* Commitment Emotional Utility-* Commitment Commitment-* Intention to donate Hypothesis HI H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10 Standardized Estimate 0.261 0.134 0.151 -0.071 0.191 0.218 0.170 0.279 0.589 • 0.865”
Listed measurement items total 61, not 63
MinorThe eight item counts listed for the measurement model add to 61, rather than the reported 63.
Reported 63 · recomputed 61
“measured using 63 items -Personal Nostalgia (20 items), Loneliness (20 items), Recovery from Grief (4 items), Intention to Donate (4 items), Commitment (4 items), Emotional Utility (4 items), Familial Utility (3 items) and Past Experiences associated with the NPO (2 items).”
Four-or-more donations are described as more than four
MinorThe reported 77.7% combines respondents who donated four times (4.2%) with those who donated more than four times (73.5%). The text describes the combined group as having donated over four times.
“77.7% of the respondents in the sample indicated that they had given to that charitable organization over four times ever before”
“Table 4-8 How many times EVER donated to the charitable organization Frequency Just once Twice Thrice Four times More than four times Percentage 9.7 7.0 5.6 4.2 73.5”
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941 · see citing works
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,801 · see citing works
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117 · see citing works
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355 · see citing works
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549 · see citing works
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,758 · see citing works
The social readjustment rating scale
Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4 · Cited by 11,174 · see citing works
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771 · see citing works
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825 · see citing works
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173 · see citing works
The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · see citing works
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004 · Cited by 3,008 · see citing works
Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122 · Cited by 2,986 · see citing works
Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey.
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.46.5.932 · Cited by 2,788 · see citing works
Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 · Cited by 2,520 · see citing works
Trilling, L. (1972) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674044463 · Cited by 2,079 · see citing works
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401 · Cited by 1,782 · see citing works
The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F. (1989) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209191 · Cited by 1,774 · see citing works
On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin.
Bentler, P. M. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
(2004) · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3 · Cited by 1,481 · see citing works
Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions
Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society
Maffesoli, M. (1996) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446222133 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?
Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated?
Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.749 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Nostalgia and consumption preferences: some emerging patterns of consumer tastes
Holbrook, M. B. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209346 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
The Mountain Man Myth: A Contemporary Consuming Fantasy
Belk, R. W., & Costa, J. A. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209536 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing
Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20203 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Sensory–perceptual episodic memory and its context: autobiographical memory
Conway, M. A. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0940 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Joy, A., & Sherry, Jr. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376802 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Older Consumers' Disposition of Special Possessions
Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J., & Curasi, C. F. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314319 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
The Role of Motivation in the Age-Related Positivity Effect in Autobiographical Memory
Kennedy, Q., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503011.x · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Mehta, R., & Belk, R. W. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208566 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement.
Bonanno, G. A., & Kaltman, S. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.760 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television
Rose, R. L., & Wood, S. L. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/432238 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best
Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A., & Poon, L. W. (1998) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211366 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Hawthorne, G. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y · Cited by 450 · see citing works
The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited.
KANUNGO, R. N. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.119 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Feelings, Fantasies, and Memories
Holak, S. L., & Havlena, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00119-7 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour
Sargeant, A. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725799784870351 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy
Basil, M. D., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2007) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20200 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
The Role of Time in the Action of the Consumer
Bergadaa, M. M. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208558 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2000) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1005615331901 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Nostalgic bonding: exploring the role of nostalgia in the consumption experience
Holbrook, M. B., & Schindler, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.127 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior
Sargeant, A., Ford, J. B., & West, D. C. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.006 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Self-citationNostalgia a psychological perspective
Batcho, K. I. (1995) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.131 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
(1994) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Loneliness: A Review of Current Literature, With Implications for Counseling and Research
McWhirter, B. T. (1990) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb02521.x · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The relationship in experience between various types of affect.
Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1031 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Bošnjak, M., Galešić, M., & Tuten, T. L. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.008 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
(2004) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Marketing for health care organizations
Woodside, A. G. (1988) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(88)90083-5 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Music, emotion, and autobiographical memory: They’re playing your song
Schulkind, M. D., Hennis, L. K., & Rubin, D. C. (1999) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201225 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Individualism and interdependence.
Waterman, A. S. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.7.762 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Consumer myths: Frye's taxonomy and the structural analysis of consumption text
Stern, B. B. (1995) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209443 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys
Braunsberger, K., Wybenga, H., & Gates, R. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.015 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
(1982) · doi:10.2307/1251168 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Charitable organizations' storytelling influence on donors' emotions and intentions
Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.013 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationGrühn, D., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.579 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Donor Trust and Relationship Commitment in the U.K. Charity Sector: The Impact on Behavior
Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2004) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764004263321 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
(1992) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Nostalgia and the emotional tone and content of song lyrics
Batcho, K. I. (2007) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/20445410 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Using Childhood Memories to Gain Insight into Brand Meaning
Braun-LaTour, K. A., LaTour, M. S., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.2.45 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The Effect of Imageability and Predicability of Cues in Autobiographical Memory
Williams, J. M. G., Healy, H. G., & Ellis, N. C. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755828 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Charitable Giving by Individuals: A Study of Attitudes and Practice
Radley, A., & Kennedy, M. (1995) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679504800605 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Personal nostalgia, world view, memory, and emotionality
Batcho, K. I. (1998) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1998.87.2.411 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Nostalgia: A review of the literature
McCann, W. H. (1941) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0057354 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Normal and Pathological Nostalgia
Werman, D. S. (1977) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306517702500205 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The time course of grief reactions to spousal loss: evidence from a national probability sample
Carnelley, K. B., Wortman, C. B., Bolger, N., & Burke, C. T. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.476 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
HOW AND WHEN ADVERTISING CAN INFLUENCE MEMORY FOR CONSUMER EXPERIENCE
Braun-LaTour, K. A., LaTour, M. S., Pickrell, J. E., Loftus, E. F., & Stanford University) is a Distinguished (2004) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639171 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Tesser, A., & Beach, S. R. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.36 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Loneliness among senior citizens: An empirical report.
Perlman, D. (1978) · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Development and validation of a Psychological Screening Inventory.
Lanyon, R. I. (1970) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0020197 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
An Exploratory Study of Age Related Vicarious Nostalgia and Aesthetic Consumption
Goulding, C. (2002) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 97 · see citing works
How should charitable organisations motivate young professionals to give philanthropically?
Kottász, R. (2004) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.230 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Measuring nonprofit marketing strategy performance: the case of museum stores
Mottner, S., & Ford, J. B. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.06.004 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationMansell, W., & Lam, D. H. (2004) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210444000052 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Nostalgia in post-socialist Russia: Exploring applications to advertising strategy
Holak, S. L., Matveev, A. V., & Havlena, W. J. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.016 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Reflections on the Origin and Aim of Nostalgia
PETERS, R. (1985) · Journal of Analytical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.1985.00135.x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Nostalgia and giving to charity: a conceptual framework for discussion and research
Merchant, A., & Ford, J. B. (2007) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.300 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationAkhtar, S. (1996) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306519604400304 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Grief, bonds, and relationships.
Weiss, R. S. (2001) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10436-002 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
(1979) · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The Use of Nostalgia in Television Advertising: A Content Analysis
Unger, L. S., Mcconocha, D. M., & Faier, J. A. (1991) · Journalism Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769909106800304 · Cited by 60
Widening the appeal of charity
Sargeant, A., Ford, J., & West, D. C. (2000) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.123 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationNostalgia and discontinuity: A test of the Davis hypothesis.
Best, J., & Nelson, E. E. (1985) · Sociology and social research · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Visit, Separation, and Deconstructing Nostalgia: Russian Students Travel to Their Old Home
LOMSKY-FEDER, E., & RAPOPORT, T. (2000) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/089124100129023819 · Cited by 33
Nonprofit History’s New Numbers (and the Need for More)
Burke, C. B. (2001) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764001302002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Association of Fundraising Professionals
(2012) · doi:10.1007/springerreference_76088 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Eikenberry, A. M. (2005) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.8 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Concern for appropriateness and ad context effects
Celuch, K. G., Slama, M. E., & Schaffenacker, S. (1997) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199701)14:1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Morbid grief reaction: a social systems perspective
Goalder, J. S. (1985) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.6.833 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Morbid grief reaction: A social systems perspective.
(1985) · doi:10.1037//0735-7028.16.6.833 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bricklin, B. (2001) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7602_03
Nostalgic objects of our affection: Mourning, memory, and maternal subjectivity.
Bassin, D. (1993) · Psychoanalytic Psychology · doi:10.1037/0736-9735.10.3.425
Memory, Nostalgia, and Gender in A Thousand Acres
McDermott, S. (2002) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/340916
Restoring continuity: The view from within.
Elson, M. (1992) · Psychoanalytic Psychology · doi:10.1037/0736-9735.9.3.369
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Belk, 1979, Gift giving behavior, vol. 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Routledge, C., Arndt, J., Hepper, E. G., & Zhou, X. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.10.001 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Back to the Future: Nostalgia Increases Optimism
Cheung, W.-Y., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Hepper, E. G., Arndt, J., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213499187 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Charitable organizations' storytelling influence on donors' emotions and intentions
Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.013 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationCollective nostalgia: A group-level emotion that confers unique benefits on the group.
Wildschut, T., Bruder, M., Robertson, S., van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037760 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Remembering the real me: Nostalgia offers a window to the intrinsic self.
Baldwin, M., Biernat, M., & Landau, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038033 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Muehling, D. D., Sprott, D. E., & Sultan, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.815110 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Hwang, J., & Hyun, S. S. (2012) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.09.001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Using Childhood Memories to Gain Insight into Brand Meaning
Braun-LaTour, K. A., LaTour, M. S., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.2.45 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Revenge travel: nostalgia and desire for leisure travel post COVID-19
Wang, Y., & Xia, L. (2021) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2021.2006858 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
What really Makes a Promotional Campaign Succeed on a Crowdfunding Platform?
Chen, S., Thomas, S., & Kohli, C. S. (2016) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2016-002 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
‘The good old days’: An examination of nostalgia in Facebook posts
Davalos, S. V., Merchant, A., Rose, G. M., Lessley, B. J., & Teredesai, A. M. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.009 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationTourism experiences as the remedy to nostalgia: conceptualizing the nostalgia and tourism nexus
Christou, P. (2018) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2018.1548582 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
When does “liking” a charity lead to donation behaviour?
Wallace, E., Buil, I., & de Chernatony, L. (2017) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2017-0210 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Sensing nostalgia through traditional food: an insight from Croatia
Renko, S., & Bučar, K. (2014) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2014-0089 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Makri, K., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.016 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Nostalgic experiences in time-honored restaurants: Antecedents and outcomes
Song, H., Xu, J. B., & Kim, J. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103080 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Septianto, F., & Tjiptono, F. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
A smile – the key to everybody’s heart?
Pham, C., & Septianto, F. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2019-0019 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Nostalgic emotions, meaning in life, subjective well-being and revisit intentions
Karagöz, D., & Ramkissoon, H. R. (2023) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101159 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The transversal of nostalgia from psychology to marketing: what does it portend for future research?
Rana, S., Raut, S. K., Prashar, S., & Quttainah, M. A. (2020) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-03-2020-2097 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Dump or recycle? Nostalgia and consumer recycling behavior
Zhang, X., Gong, X., & Jiang, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.033 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context
Nguyen, C., Faulkner, M., Yang, S. H., Williams, J. H., & Tong, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.044 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Do past scandals influence the present performance? The moderating role of consumer mindset
Septianto, F. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.011 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Blending the past and present in a retro branded music concert: the impact of nostalgia proneness
Hallegatte, D., Ertz, M., & Marticotte, F. (2018) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-08-2017-1546 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Santini, F. D. O., Lim, W. M., Ladeira, W. J., Costa Pinto, D., Herter, M. M., & Rasul, T. (2023) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21872 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Dam, C., Hartmann, B. J., & Brunk, K. H. (2024) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2024.2339454 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Nostalgia prompts sustainable product disposal
Wang, Y., Hong, T., Sarigöllü, E., & Xu, W. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1832 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ko, Y. J., Rhee, Y. C., Kim, Y., & Kim, T. (2014) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106169341402300204 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Persuasive Mechanisms of Nostalgic Brand Packages
Orth, U. R., & Gal, S. (2013) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2973 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Developing an emic scale to measure ad-evoked nostalgia in a collectivist emerging market, India
Jain, V., Merchant, A., Roy, S., & Ford, J. B. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.039 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationConsuming in response to loneliness: Bright side and dark side effects
Fumagalli, E., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101329 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The Influence of Image Valence on the Attention Paid to Charity Advertising
Santos, M. A. D., Lobos, C., Munoz, N. M., Romero, D., & Ricardo Sanhueza, P. (2017) · Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing · doi:10.1080/10495142.2017.1326355 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Menstrual cycle effects on prosocial orientation, gift giving, and charitable giving
Stenstrom, E. P., Saad, G., & Hingston, S. T. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.055 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Nostalgia advertising and young Indian consumers: The power of old songs
Chou, H., & Singhal, D. (2017) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.11.004 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Touching with heart, reasoning by truth!” The impact of brand cues on mini-film advertising effect
Wu, T., Xu, T., Li, L. Q., & Yuan, K. (2020) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1755184 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Passion for the past: Effect of charity appeals and nostalgia on clothing donation intentions
Kim, S., & Childs, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1924 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Barnwell, R. W., Collier, J. E., & Shanahan, K. J. (2022) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2036652 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Impact of Time Orientation on Consumer Innovativeness in the United States and India
Merchant, A., Rose, G. M., & Rose, M. (2014) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679220307 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation Source Reliance and Charitable Giving Decisions
(2017) · doi:10.1002/nml.21258 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Septianto, F., Kemper, J. A., & Chiew, T. M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.021 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Maleki, F., & Hosseini, S. M. (2020) · International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing · doi:10.1007/s12208-020-00254-3 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Xu, J. B., & Ho, P. S. Y. (2021) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2021.1972723 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Zhou, S., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977381 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Future Time Perspective Moderates Consumer Responses to Nostalgic Advertising
Ju, I., Bluck, S., & Liao, H. (2018) · GeroPsych · doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000193 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kazlauskė, D., & Gineikienė, J. (2017) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-08-2016-0185 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Determinants and outcomes of superstitious beliefs: a multi-study approach
Sierra, J. J., Hyman, M. R., & Turri, A. M. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2018.1544923 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Improving Blood Donor Retention and Donor Relationships with Past Donation Use Appeals
Shehu, E., Veseli, B., Clément, M., & Winterich, K. P. (2023) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705231202244 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wagner, U., Jacob, I., Khanna, M., & Rai, K. A. (2020) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2020.1813671 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Does Holbrook's Nostalgia Index Measure Nostalgia Proneness?
Hallegatte, D., & Marticotte, F. (2014) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Leclercq, T., Denis, É., & Hoornaert, S. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2023.2289370 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A consumer wisdom-informed conceptualization for understanding prosocial behaviors
Nguyen, Q. N. X., Thai, N. T., Heffernan, T. W., Reynolds, N. L., & Zainuddin, N. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115293 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Me, Myself, and I: Examining the Effect of Loneliness and Self-Focus on Message Referents
Kemp, E., Moore, D., & Cowart, K. O. (2016) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2015.1119766 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hickman, T. M. (2019) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.32731/smq.282.062019.04 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Rajendran, R. P., & Arun, C. J. (2020) · International Journal of Business & Economics (IJBE) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4253276 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Societal reminiscence and decisions for a better society: A belief in progress explanation
Kwan, C. M. C., Cheng, S. Y. Y., & Tsang, A. S. L. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113365 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hoskins, A. L., & Hoskins, J. D. (2024) · Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1864 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tell me why or tell me to whom: Framing charitable solicitations based on political orientation
Denis, É., Leclercq, T., & Ritondo, R. (2022) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/20515707221107595 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility: Redemption from Excessive Executive Pay?
Chen, Q., Ding, S.-J., & Zhang, R. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05920-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
How Does Nostalgia Affect Donor Giving Behavior?
Stuhler, K. (2017) · Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66023-3_197 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., Durango‐Cohen, E. J., & Durango-Cohen, P. L. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Social Value of Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis
Júnior, A. P. S., Espanhol, C. A., Mainardes, E. W., & Sepulcri, L. M. C. B. (2024) · Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing · doi:10.1080/10495142.2024.2353382 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hallegatte, D. (2017) · Revue Organisations & territoires · doi:10.1522/revueot.v26i1-2.206 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nostalgia de Experiências Memoráveis e a Revisita a Locais de Turismo
Pereira, M. D. S., & Hor-Meyll, L. F. (2017) · ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/remark.v16i4.3678 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Impact of Nostalgic Advertising on Consumer Willingness to Donate During a Crisis
Pichierri, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20914-7_3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Acho, C. S. (2017) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Mechanism of Nostalgia as a Narrative in XXI’s Campaign #RinduNontondiXXI
Josephine, E., & Fadilah, F. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211228.052 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Humanitarian non-profit organizations’ marketing’s effects on donor behavior in social media
Lassila, H. (2010) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“But you weren’t there!” – Effects of historical nostalgia on young consumers
Neave, C., Freemantle, H., & Lappeman, J. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-12-2024-7467 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fei, H., Hua, J., & Gong, R. (2015) · Advances in intelligent systems research/Advances in Intelligent Systems Research · doi:10.2991/lemcs-15.2015.282 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The influence of anthropomorphic spokescharacters on consumers' recycling intentions
Jain, R. (2021) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.208973 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rho, Y. (2015) · Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies · doi:10.16999/kasws.2015.46.2.65 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Study on the Nostalgia effect of Dance for All Participants during the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
An, J.-H., Lim, S.-Y., & Lee, J.-S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2578121/v1
Factors Leading to Nostalgic Experience in the Event of Indian Bank Mergers
Lakkol, S. G., & Rao, A. S. (2025) · KIM Journal of Business Research · doi:10.63152/kimjbr.v4i4.77
Encouraging donation intentions and satisfaction with life: is it altruism or others?
Eastman, J. K., Gordon‐Wilson, S., & Iyer, R. (2026) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2026.2630070
مقياس مقترح متعدد الأبعاد للميل للحنين إلى الماضي للمستهلک المصري وأثره على النوايا السلوکية للشراء
الغرباوى, ع. ا. ح. (2017) · المجلة العملیة التجارة والتمویل · doi:10.21608/caf.2017.126576
(2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78769-343-220181019
Understanding Donor Motivation and Behaviour Among Middle – Class Americans
Marten, C. (2015) · Research Commons (University of Waikato)
ZAMAN ORYANTASYONU İLE TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: TÜRKİYE VE İRAN ÖRNEĞİ
Ünalan, M., Yapraklı, T. Ş., & Absalan, A. (2017) · Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi · doi:10.18092/ulikidince.348341
Denis, É., Leclercq, T., & Ritondo, R. (2022) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/07673701221115322
스포츠 예능프로그램의 노스텔지어가 시청태도, 시청의도에 미치는 영향: 스포츠 관여도의 조절된 매개효과
정, 건., 양, 태., & 조, 성. (2025) · 한국체육학회지 · doi:10.23949/kjpe.2025.11.64.6.38
Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., Durango‐Cohen, E. J., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4683837
Guo, X., Jian, Y., He, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2026) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-09-2025-0565
Scott, M. A. (2024) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.246579
Re-conceptualising the donation behaviour of Australians: a generational perspective
Sakakibara, G., & Luis, J. Á. H. (2014)
Giving while grieving: understanding the motivations behind memorial philanthropy
Penner, S. J. (2018) · Mspace (University of Manitoba)
Estrutura intelectual da produção científica sobre nostalgia: uma análise bibliométrica
Braum, L. M. D. S., Nassif, V. M. J., Lopes, E. L., & Urdan, A. T. (2021) · Ciências sociais aplicadas em revista · doi:10.48075/csar.v20i38.28473
The multilevel memory–reward coactivation framework of nostalgia: a literature reviewPreprint
Oba, K., & Sugiura, M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tm5zn
- Authors
- Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Rose, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington Tacoma (US)
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Merchant, Altaf
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 610-616
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066042777
- Semantic Scholar
- e136e220c637a89ef012f3ab58e3a0bbfd983aee
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
- ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Old Dominion University
- Funders
- Academy of Marketing
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- personal nostalgia, charitable giving, donor commitments, grief recovery, loneliness, discontinuities, life experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review