Satisfied and unwilling: Exploring cognitive and situational resistance to innovations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016) proved the effectiveness of mental simulation and benefit comparison.
“Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016) were able to prove the effectiveness of mental simulation and benefit comparison.”
From How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature (2023) · cites this paper as Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016)
Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016) demonstrated that mental simulation and benefit comparison reduce passive innovation resistance to new product adoption.
“Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016) demonstrated that mental simulation and benefit comparison reduce passive innovation resistance to new product adoption.”
From How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature (2023) · cites this paper as Heidenreich and Kraemer (2016)
Cites
Zhou, K. Z., & Nakamoto, K. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-006-0011-3 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature
Godefroid, M.-E., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2023) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00283-8 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Feng, W., Tu, R., Lu, T., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1557745 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Heidenreich, S., & Talke, K. (2020) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-020-00164-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Heidenreich, S., Kraemer, T., & Handrich, M.
- Affiliations
- Saarland University (DE)
- University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
- EBS University of Business and Law (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heidenreich, Sven
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2440-2447
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070486738
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- resistance to innovation, passive resistance, cognitive resistance, new product adoption, consumer behavior, product launch, innovation failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
