Re-placing place in marketing: a resource-exchange place perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retail scholars have traditionally focused on the materiality of store location as branded and boundaried space.
“Various disciplines are based on broad spatial, temporal, and social perspectives; however, retail scholars have traditionally focused on the materiality of store location as branded and boundaried space (Rosenbaum et al., 2017).”
From Retail futures: Customer experience, phygital retailing, and the Experiential Retail Territories perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Rosenbaum et al., 2017
Cites
Bagozzi, R. P. (1975) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250593 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing
MacInnis, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136 · Cited by 1,547 · see citing works
A measure of restorative quality in environments.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997) · Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research · doi:10.1080/02815739708730435 · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alexander, B., & Varley, R. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104108 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosenbaum, M. S., Kelleher, C., Friman, M., Kristensson, P., & Scherer, A.
- ORCID
- Rosenbaum, Mark S.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 281-289
- ISSN
- 0148-2963
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review