The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm
Open accessAbstract
This study extends the discussion of digital servitization business models by adopting the perspective of the theory of the firm. We use four theories of the firm (industrial organization, the resource-based view, organizational identity, and the transaction cost approach) to understand digital servitization business models of firms in the context of ecosystems. Digitalization transforms the business models of solution providers and shapes their firm boundary decisions as they develop digital solutions across organizational boundaries within ecosystems such as harbors, mines, and airports. Thus, digitalization not only affects individual firms' business models but also requires the alignment of the business models of other firms within the ecosystem. Hence, business models in digital servitization should be viewed from an ecosystem perspective. Based on a rigorous literature review, we provide suggestions for future research on digital servitization business models within ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Adner, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316678451 · Cited by 2,600
Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12105 · Cited by 2,394
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review
Toorajipour, R., Sohrabpour, V., Nazarpour, A., Oghazi, P., & Fischl, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.009 · Cited by 1,020
“In this regard, many companies are shifting from remote monitoring to control, optimization, and finally, advanced autonomous AI-based systems to improve their functionality (Kohtam ¨ aki et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009 · Cited by 584
Self-citationTransformational shifts through digital servitization
Tronvoll, B., Sklyar, A., Sörhammar, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005 · Cited by 413
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
Digital technologies in product-service systems: a literature review and a research agenda
Pirola, F., Boucher, X., Wiesner, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103301 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 104
- Pages
- 380-392
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2954217333
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 112.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
- The paper
- Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
