Cited by 36AI in Service InteractionsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Problem Solving on Customers’ Continued Usage Intention in e-Commerce Platforms: An Expectation-Confirmation Model Approach

Open access
Gao, Junzhe, Opute, Abdullah Promise, Jawad, Caroline, Zhan, Meng·2025·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has led to its widespread application across various fields, including e-commerce platforms. AI chatbots, powered by large data models, have emerged as a crucial tool for enhancing customer service and user experience. This study aims to investigate the impact of AI chatbot problem-solving capabilities on users’ intention to continue using these services within e-commerce platforms. By integrating elements from the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a comprehensive research model is proposed to examine the relationships between problem-solving, confirmation, perceived ease of use, satisfaction, trust, and continued usage intention. The study employs structural equation modelling (SEM) to analyse data collected from 315 participants through an online questionnaire. The findings reveal that problem-solving abilities positively influence users’ confirmation, which in turn positively affects satisfaction, perceived ease of use, and trust. Furthermore, perceived ease of use exhibits a positive impact on satisfaction, trust, and continued usage intention. Satisfaction and trust have a positive impact on continued usage intention, with satisfaction showing a stronger influence than both problem-solving ability and ease of use. The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of user perceptions and behaviours in AI-driven interactions within e-commerce platforms. It hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115661

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies focusing on intention usually follow extended TAM/ECT/TPB logic, in which quality/usefulness and confirmation lead to higher satisfaction and/or attitudes, which then predict continued use, purchase intention, or loyalty.

    “Studies that focus on intention usually follow the extended TAM/ECT/TPB logic, which says that quality/usefulness and confirmation lead to higher satisfaction and/or attitudes, which then predict outcomes like continued use, purchase intention, or loyalty”
  • Systems designed to minimize friction augment perceived utility and user satisfaction, thereby reinforcing trust and subsequent intention outcomes.

    “Systems designed to minimize friction (e.g., expedited information access, simplified input, structured guidance, enhanced navigation) augment perceived utility and user satisfaction, thereby reinforcing trust and subsequent intention outcomes (e.g., retention, purchase intention, reliance-oriented metrics) [6,44,45,48,50,52,67,69].”
  • Problem-solving proficiency, confirmation, and perceived ease of use increase user satisfaction and trust, which further mediate chatbot usage.

    “Gao et al. [48] show that problem-solving proficiency, confirmation, and perceived ease of use increase user satisfaction and trust, which further mediate chatbot usage.”
  • The net-positive pattern is evident in dominant satisfaction/continuance pathways according to numerous studies.

    “According to numerous studies [44,46,48,50,69], this pattern is evident in dominant satisfaction/continuance pathways.”
  • In the main empirical cluster (Autonomy-1, recommendation/support scope), positive outcomes usually follow a utility/assurance chain: performance cues and interaction quality make people feel more useful and satisfied, which builds trust and leads to downstream adoption/continuance or purchase-intent outcomes.

    “In the main empirical cluster (Autonomy-1, recommendation/support scope), positive outcomes usually follow a utility/assurance chain: performance cues and interaction quality make people feel more useful and satisfied, which builds trust and leads to downstream adoption/continuance or purchase-intent outcomes (e.g., [44,46,48,50,69]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gao, J., Opute, A. P., Jawad, C., & Zhan, M.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing College of International Business and Economics (CN)
  • University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
  • Huanghuai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Opute, Abdullah Promise
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
200
Pages
115661
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413513604
Cited by
36
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 3
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (233517)
  • Division of Graduate Education (2023SJGLX339Y)
  • Foundation of Henan Educational Committee
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
AI chatbots, e-commerce platforms, continuance intention, problem-solving skills, expectation-confirmation model, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, customer satisfaction, trust, user retention, customer service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review