The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd
Open accessAbstract
The basic idea of crowdfunding is to raise external finance from a large audience (the “crowd”), where each individual provides a very small amount, instead of soliciting a small group of sophisticated investors. The paper develops a model that associates crowdfunding with pre-ordering and price discrimination, and studies the conditions under which crowdfunding is preferred to traditional forms of external funding. Compared to traditional funding, crowdfunding has the advantage of offering an enhanced experience to some consumers and, thereby, of allowing the entrepreneur to practice menu pricing and extract a larger share of the consumer surplus; the disadvantage is that the entrepreneur is constrained in his/her choice of prices by the amount of capital that he/she needs to raise: the larger this amount, the more prices have to be twisted so as to attract a large number of “crowdfunders” who pre-order, and the less profitable the menu pricing scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6 · Cited by 3,306
Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence
Cadsby, C. B., & Maynes, E. (1999) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00049-8 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Nambisan, S. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12254 · Cited by 2,771
Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12267 · Cited by 760
Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding
Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T., & Koeck, B. (2014) · Venture Capital · doi:10.1080/13691066.2014.916512 · Cited by 448
Disruption of financial intermediation by FinTech: a review on crowdfunding and blockchain
Cai, C. W. (2018) · Accounting & Finance · doi:10.1111/acfi.12405 · Cited by 319
Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation
Stanko, M. A., & Henard, D. H. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Venturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 585-609
- ISSN
- 0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121545263
- Cited by
- 2,690
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 290.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
- The paper
- Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.