Cited by 279Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEconomic Policies and ImpactsGame Theory and Voting Systems

Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence

Cadsby, Charles Bram, Maynes, Elizabeth·1999·Journal of Public Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00049-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadsby, C. B., & Maynes, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cadsby, Charles Bram
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
53-73
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142640713
Cited by
279
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Policies and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
threshold public goods, voluntary contributions, money-back guarantee, public goods provision, free-riding, reward, threshold effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review