The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative analysis of the reactivity of formate species seen by DRIFTS over a Au/Ce(La)O2 water–gas shift catalyst: First unambiguous evidence of the minority role of formates as reaction intermediates
Open accessAbstract
The reactivity of the species formed at the surface of a Au/Ce(La)O2 catalyst during the water–gas shift (WGS) reaction were investigated by operando diffuse reflectance Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) at the chemical steady state during isotopic transient kinetic analyses (SSITKA). The exchanges of the reaction product CO2 and of formate and carbonate surface species were followed during an isotopic exchange of the reactant CO using a DRIFTS cell as a single reactor. The DRIFTS cell was a modified commercial cell that yielded identical reaction rates to that measured over a quartz plug-flow reactor. The DRIFTS signal was used to quantify the relative concentrations of the surface species and CO2. The analysis of the formate exchange curves between 428 and 493 K showed that at least two levels of reactivity were present. “Slow formates” displayed an exchange rate constant 10- to 20-fold slower than that of the reaction product CO2. “Fast formates” were exchanged on a time scale similar to that of CO2. Multiple nonreactive readsorption of CO2 took place, accounting for the kinetics of the exchange of CO2(g) and making it impossible to determine the number of active sites through the SSITKA technique. The concentration (in mol g−1) of formates on the catalyst was determined through a calibration curve and allowed calculation of the specific rate of formate decomposition. The rate of CO2 formation was more than an order of magnitude higher than the rate of decomposition of formates (slow + fast species), indicating that all of the formates detected by DRIFTS could not be the main reaction intermediates in the production of CO2. This work stresses the importance of full quantitative analyses (measuring both rate constants and adsorbate concentrations) when investigating the role of adsorbates as potential reaction intermediates, and illustrates how even reactive species seen by DRIFTS may be unimportant in the overall reaction scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO 2 -Based Materials
Montini, T., Melchionna, M., Monai, M., & Fornasiero, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603 · Cited by 2,766
Bobadilla, L. F., Santos, J. L., Ivanova, S., Odriozola, J. A., & Urakawa, A. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b02121 · Cited by 375
The reverse water gas shift reaction: a process systems engineering perspective
González-Castaño, M., Dorneanu, B., & Arellano-García, H. (2021) · Reaction Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1039/d0re00478b · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- MEUNIER, F., REID, D., GOGUET, A., SHEKHTMAN, S., HARDACRE, C., BURCH, R., DENG, W., & FLYTZANISTEPHANOPOULOS, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Catalysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04-25
- Volume
- 247
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 0021-9517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162904465
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative analysis of the reactivity of formate species seen by DRIFTS over a Au/Ce(La)O2 water–gas shift catalyst: First unambiguous evidence of the minority role of formates as reaction intermediates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcat.2007.02.013
- The paper
- MEUNIER, F., REID, D., GOGUET, A., SHEKHTMAN, S., HARDACRE, C., BURCH, R., DENG, W., & FLYTZANISTEPHANOPOULOS, M. (2007). Quantitative analysis of the reactivity of formate species seen by DRIFTS over a Au/Ce(La)O2 water–gas shift catalyst: First unambiguous evidence of the minority role of formates as reaction intermediates. Journal of Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2007.02.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.