Technical, practical and analytic innovations in single case designs for contextual behavioral scientists
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Single case experimental designs provide a pragmatic alternative that can rival randomized controlled trial rigor while requiring fewer participants.
“Single case experimental designs (SCED) provide a pragmatic alternative that, when well-designed and executed, rival the scientific rigor of randomized controlled trials while requiring far fewer participants (Barlow, Nock, & Hersen, 2008; Smith, 2012; Vilardaga, 2014).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Vilardaga, 2014
Cites
The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis
Jones, F. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1939) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416495 · Cited by 4,388 · see citing works
Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition
Barnes‐Holmes, Y., Hayes, S. C., Barnes‐Holmes, D., & Roche, B. T. (2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2482 · Cited by 1,974 · see citing works
Mobile Health Technology Evaluation
Kumar, S., Nilsen, W. J., Abernethy, A., Atienza, A., Patrick, K., Pavel, M., Riley, W. T., Shar, A., Spring, B., Spruijt-Metz, D., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise
Riley, W. T., Glasgow, R. E., Etheredge, L., & Abernethy, A. P. (2013) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/2001-1326-2-10 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Single-case and Small-n Experimental Designs
Todman, J., & Dugard, P. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410600943 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.10.002 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Randomization tests: A new gold standard?
Dugard, P. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.10.001 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Vilardaga, R., Bricker, J. B., & McDonell, M. G. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.03.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle case designs in clinical practice: A contemporary CBS perspective on why and how to
Holman, G. I., & Koerner, K. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.04.006 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes
Villatte, J. L., Vilardaga, R., Villatte, M., Plumb Vilardaga, J. C., Atkins, D. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationRecommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques.
Manolov, R., & Moeyaert, M. (2017) · The Behavior Therapist · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.04.008 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Hill, M. L., Schaefer, L. W., Spencer, S. D., & Masuda, A. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.04.006 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Reticulated and Progressive Strategy for Developing Clinical Applications of RFT
Villatte, M., Villatte, J. L., & Hayes, S. C. (2017) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-017-0251-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Davies, K. (2018) · Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · doi:10.24385/lincoln.24325960 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vilardaga, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vilardaga, Roger
- ORCID
- Vilardaga, Roger
- Venue
- Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-137
- ISSN
- 2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044905761
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, contextual behavioral science, analytical methods, practical implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
