Cited by 11Reproductive Health and TechnologiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Assessing psychological inflexibility in infertility: The development and validation study of the Psychological Inflexibility Scale – Infertility (PIS-I)

Open access
Galhardo, Ana, Cunha, Marina, Monteiro, Bárbara, Pinto-Gouveia, José·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 11

Authors
Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., Monteiro, B., & Pinto-Gouveia, J.
Affiliations
Instituto Superior Miguel Torga (PT)
Corresponding author
Galhardo, Ana
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
18
Pages
239-246
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087270862
Cited by
11
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
psychological inflexibility, infertility, scale development, psychometric validation, factor structure, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological distress, women with infertility, self-report measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review