Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29Media Influence and PoliticsNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure to television and individual beliefs: Evidence from a natural experiment

Hennighausen, Tanja·2015·Journal of Comparative Economics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jce.2015.03.005

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Hennighausen, T.
Affiliations
University of Mannheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Hennighausen, Tanja
Venue
Journal of Comparative Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
956-980
ISSN
0147-5967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125601718
Cited by
29
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Comparative Economics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universität Mannheim
  • Bundesinstitut für Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
television exposure, media influence, personal beliefs, East Germans, German reunification, East-West German comparison, German Socio-Economic Panel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure to television and individual beliefs: Evidence from a natural experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jce.2015.03.005
The paper
Hennighausen, T. (2015). Exposure to television and individual beliefs: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.03.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.