The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements
Open accessAbstract
This series presents research findings based either directly on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) or using SOEP data as part of an internationally comparable data set (e.g.CNEF, ECHP, LIS, LWS, CHER/PACO).SOEP is a truly multidisciplinary household panel study covering a wide range of social and behavioral sciences: economics, sociology, psychology, survey methodology, econometrics and applied statistics, educational science, political science, public health, behavioral genetics, demography, geography, and sport science.The decision to publish a submission in SOEPpapers is made by a board of editors chosen by the DIW Berlin to represent the wide range of disciplines covered by SOEP.There is no external referee process and papers are either accepted or rejected without revision.Papers appear in this series as works in progress and may also appear elsewhere.They often represent preliminary studies and are circulated to encourage discussion.Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character.A revised version may be requested from the author directly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
Diener, E. (1994) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf01207052 · Cited by 2,317
The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100735 · Cited by 1,768
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04271 · Cited by 1,726 · cited 1×
“…See, e.g., Camerer et al. (2005), Borghans et al. (2005) and Hsu et al. (2005), De Quervain et al. (2004), McCLure et al. (2004), Kuhnen/Knutson (2005), Knutson/Peterson (2005), Fehr et al. (2005a, b), Singer et al. (2006) and for a broader social science perspective, Freese et al. (2003).”
Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status.
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527 · Cited by 1,357
Time Does Not Heal All Wounds: A Longitudinal Study of Reaction and Adaptation to Divorce
Lucas, R. E. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01642.x · Cited by 492
Frick, J. R., Goebel, J., Schechtman, E., Wagner, G. G., & Yitzhaki, S. (2006) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124105283109 · Cited by 129
Self-citation
Cited by
Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025948 · Cited by 1,410
Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.1238 · Cited by 1,332
Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples
Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4 · Cited by 1,123
Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004 · Cited by 927
Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age
Luhmann, M., & Hawkley, L. C. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000117 · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch
- Publisher
- Duncker & Humblot GmbH
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-169
- ISSN
- 0342-1783 (ISSN-L)
- 2568-762X
- 2568-7603
- OpenAlex
- W2141697271
- Cited by
- 1,765
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 257.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3790/schm.127.1.139
- The paper
- Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.127.1.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
