Cited by 122Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesAntibiotic Use and ResistanceBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing do not influence clinical outcome in children with cystic fibrosis

Open access
Hurley, M.N., Ariff, A.H. Amin, Bertenshaw, C., Bhatt, J., Smyth, A.R.·2012·Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with CF experience pulmonary exacerbations. These are often initially empirically treated with intravenous antibiotics, with antibiotic choice refined after susceptibility testing. METHODS: We completed a 5-year retrospective review of children attending the Paediatric CF Unit, Nottingham. The respiratory sampling, antibiotic prescribing and susceptibility testing guidance were audited. Episodes were classified according to the concordance between the antibiotics prescribed and antibiotic susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Of 52 patients who had previously isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 103 antibiotic courses were commenced that coincided with an isolation of P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa was fully susceptible, partially susceptible or fully resistant on 33%, 44.7% or 16.5% of occasions respectively. The antibiotic prescriptions were never changed following antibiotic susceptibility testing. We found no association between change in FEV(1) (p=0.54), change in BMI (p=0.12) or time to next exacerbation (p=0.66) and concordance between antibiotic susceptibility and the antibiotics administered. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to mounting evidence questioning the utility of routine antibiotic susceptibility testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.02.006

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no detectable relation between antibiotic susceptibility of cultured organisms and clinical response to therapy in exacerbations, even in cystic fibrosis.

    “there is no detectable relation between antibiotic susceptibility of cultured organisms and clinical response to therapy in exacerbations, even in cystic fibrosis.”

    From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurley, M. N., Ariff, A. H. A., Bertenshaw, C., Bhatt, J., & Smyth, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurley, M.N.
Venue
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
288-292
ISSN
1569-1993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102376874
Cited by
122
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT092295AIA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pulmonary exacerbations, empirical antibiotic therapy, antibiotic prescribing, antimicrobial resistance, clinical outcomes, children, FEV1, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Infant, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Infections, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Pneumonia, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review