Cited by 21Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorCystic Fibrosis Research Advances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing a measure of eating attitudes and behaviours in cystic fibrosis

Open access
Randlesome, Katy, Bryon, Mandy, Evangeli, Michael·2013·Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Abstract

Background Eating disorders or disturbed eating attitudes and behaviours (EABs) may contribute to poor nutritional status in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Existing measures of disturbed EABs can have different meanings in this population and do not assess CF-related EABs. A self-report measure of EABs in CF was developed to highlight areas of eating disturbance. Methods The content validity of a draft measure was evaluated via expert evaluation and literature review and an amended measure piloted with 8 CF patients using cognitive interviewing. A further amended measure was administered to 155 CF patients (11-62 years) attending CF clinics. Results Principal components analyses revealed a three-factor structure ('Desire for thinness and weight loss', 'Disturbed EABs', and 'Appetite') with good internal consistencies for subscales and the 21-item whole measure. Conclusions The measure looks promising as a tool to highlight EAB disturbance in CF. Further work will establish its construct validity and clarify interpretation of subscales.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.05.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bryon, 2008, Eating disorders and disturbance in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis, Child Health Care, 37, 67, 10.1080/02739610701766909 · DOI
  2. Truby, 2001, Body image and dieting behavior in cystic fibrosis, Pediatrics, 107, E92, 10.1542/peds.107.6.e92 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gilchrist, 2007, Distorted body image and anorexia complicating cystic fibrosis in an adolescent, J Cyst Fibros, 7, 437, 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.04.003 · DOI
  4. Abbott, 2007, Nutritional status, perceived body image and eating behaviours in adults with cystic fibrosis, Clin Nutr, 26, 91, 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Warlters, 2001, Sex differences in weight perception and nutritional behaviour in adults with cystic fibrosis, J Hum Nutr Diet, 14, 83, 10.1046/j.1365-277X.2001.00274.x · DOI
  6. Dodge, 1992, Malnutrition and age-specific nutritional management in cystic fibrosis, Neth J Med, 41, 127
  7. Steinkamp, 2000, Relationship between nutritional status and lung function in cystic fibrosis: cross sectional and longitudinal analyses from the German CF quality assurance (CFQA) project, Thorax, 57, 596, 10.1136/thorax.57.7.596 · DOI
  8. Beker, 2001, Stature as a prognostic factor in cystic fibrosis survival, J Am Diet Assoc, 101, 438, 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00113-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Garner, 1979, The eating attitudes test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa, Psychol Med, 10, 273, 10.1017/S0033291700030762 · DOI
  10. White, 2007, Nutritional intake and status in children with cystic fibrosis: does age matter?, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 44, 116, 10.1097/01.mpg.0000237929.45846.78 · DOI
  11. Vince, 2008, A set of meta-analytic studies on the factors associated with disordered eating, Internet J Ment Health, 5, 1
  12. Lyn, 1986, Determination and quantification of content validity, Nurs Res, 35, 382
  13. Brown, 1999, Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis—definitions, differences, and choices, JALT Test Eval SIG Newsl, 13, 26
  14. Streiner, 1994, Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis, Can J Psychiatry, 39, 135, 10.1177/070674379403900303 · DOI
  15. Critchley, 1985, Influence in principal components analysis, Biometrika, 72, 627, 10.1093/biomet/72.3.627 · DOI
  16. Lavender, 2009, Effect of perceived anonymity in assessments of eating disordered behaviors and attitudes, Int J Eat Disord, 42, 546, 10.1002/eat.20645 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Randlesome, K., Bryon, M., & Evangeli, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bryon, Mandy
Venue
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
1569-1993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041987869
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Keywords
disordered eating, eating disorders, self-report measures, content validity, cognitive interviewing, appetite, weight loss, nutritional status, psychometric development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Psychometrics, Comorbidity, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review