Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In traditional adult assessments, a binge episode is counted only when the amount eaten is considered unambiguously large.
“Traditional adult assessments of binge eating require that a binge episode be identified only if the amount of food consumed is deemed “unambiguously large” [23].”
From LIBER8 design and methods: An integrative intervention for loss of control eating among African American and White adolescent girls (2013) · cites this paper as [23]
Previous studies have found the EDE to produce reliable and stable scores.
“This measure has also yielded reliable and stable scores in previous studies [23, 76].”
From LIBER8 design and methods: An integrative intervention for loss of control eating among African American and White adolescent girls (2013) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 205
- Authors
- Fairburn, C. G., & Beglin, S. J.
- Venue
- PsycTESTS Dataset
- Published
- 1994
- OpenAlex
- W2935892262
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycTESTS Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- eating disorders, Eating Disorder Examination, eating disorder symptoms, psychometric assessment, questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
