Cited by 21Machine Learning in HealthcareHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Natural language processing for adjudication of heart failure in the electronic health record

Open access
Cunningham, Jonathan W., Singh, Pulkit, Reeder, Christopher, Lau, Emily S., Khurshid, Shaan, Wang, Xin, Ellinor, Patrick T., Lubitz, Steven A. +2 more·2023·JACC: Heart Failure

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) data repositories have the potential to accelerate research in heart failure (HF) epidemiology, biology, and policy because of large sample size, long-term follow-up, and granular clinical details.However, imprecise ascertainment of clinical endpoints such as HF hospitalization by International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes has limited research using EHR data sets.The gold standard for endpoint adjudication, physician review of medical records, is not feasible at the scale of EHR cohorts.Innovation in natural language processing (NLP) now enables training of complex text models with few labeled examples.In this study, we trained and validated an NLP model for automated adjudication of HF hospitalization from raw discharge summary text.We studied hospitalizations in the Community Care Cohort Project (C3PO), an EHR cohort of 520,868 patients (mean age: 48 years, 61% women) receiving longitudinal primary care between 2001 and 2018 at Mass General Brigham. 1 Analysis of C3PO was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.Possible HF hospitalizations were identified by ICD codes in the primary or secondary position as defined by the American Heart Association "Get with the Guidelines" registry.Boardcertified cardiologists adjudicated medical records to determine whether hospitalizations met the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative criteria for HF: 1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.02.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunningham, J. W., Singh, P., Reeder, C., Lau, E. S., Khurshid, S., Wang, X., Ellinor, P. T., Lubitz, S. A., Batra, P., & Ho, J. E.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ho, Jennifer E.
Venue
JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
852-854
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323256948
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • American Heart Association Inc
  • Leducq Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
heart failure, heart failure hospitalization, adjudication, natural language processing, electronic health records, ICD codes, primary care
MeSH terms
Heart Failure, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review