Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Frequency of Major Noncardiac Surgery and Subsequent Adverse Events in the Year After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement

Open access
Berger, Peter B., Kleiman, Neal S., Pencina, Michael J., Hsieh, Wen-Hua, Steinhubl, Steven R., Jeremias, Allen, Sonel, Ali, Browne, Kevin, Barseness, Greg, Cohen, David J.·2010·JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the frequency of noncardiac surgery and adverse post-operative events among patients who recently received a drug-eluting stent (DES) following noncardiac surgery. BACKGROUND Little is known about frequency of and risks associated with noncardiac surgery after DES implantation. METHODS In the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry, consecutive patients who underwent attempted stent placement at 42 hospitals between July 2004 and September 2005 were enrolled and followed for 1 year. In this study, we analyzed patients who received ≥ 1 DES to determine the frequency of noncardiac surgery and cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis in the following week. RESULTS Among 4,637 DES recipients, 206 (4.4%) underwent major noncardiac surgery in the following year (median days to surgery: 179 [interquartile range 112 to 266 days; range 13 to 360 days]). Overall, stent use averaged 1.5 per patient. The most frequent operations were orthopedic (36%), abdominal (31%), and vascular (20%). Compared with patients who did not undergo surgery, those who did were older, more likely to be women, and have had a prior stroke; the frequencies of prior myocardial infarction, prior coronary artery bypass graft, and diabetes were similar, as were left ventricular ejection fraction and indication for percutaneous coronary intervention. In the 7 days after surgery, 4 patients had a cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis (1.9% [exact 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5% to 4.9%]). The risk of the composite outcome was increased 27-fold in the week following noncardiac surgery compared with any other week after stent implantation (hazard ratio [HR]: 27.3 [95% CI: 10.0 to 74.2], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The frequency of major noncardiac surgery in the year after DES placement is >4%. Although the overall risk of adverse outcomes was less than previously reported when surgery is performed months after DES placement, it is significantly increased in the week after major noncardiac surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.021

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Berger, P. B., Kleiman, N. S., Pencina, M. J., Hsieh, W.-H., Steinhubl, S. R., Jeremias, A., Sonel, A., Browne, K., Barseness, G., & Cohen, D. J.
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
920-927
ISSN
  • 1876-7605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-8798
OpenAlex
W56850546
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency of Major Noncardiac Surgery and Subsequent Adverse Events in the Year After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.021
The paper
Berger, P. B., Kleiman, N. S., Pencina, M. J., Hsieh, W.-H., Steinhubl, S. R., Jeremias, A., Sonel, A., Browne, K., Barseness, G., & Cohen, D. J. (2010). Frequency of Major Noncardiac Surgery and Subsequent Adverse Events in the Year After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.