Cited by 162Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and ApplicationsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient and fast removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from an aqueous solution using a chitosan/Mg-Al-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite

Lyu, Feiyan, Yu, Haiqin, Hou, Tailei, Yan, Liangguo, Zhang, Xiaohui, Du, Bin·2019·Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

A new nanocomposite based on chitosan (CS) and Mg-Al-layered double hydroxide (Mg-Al-LDH) was prepared using an emulsion-crosslinking method. CS was immobilized within the Mg-Al-LDH matrix to form the CS-LDH after crosslinking by epichlorohydrin. The characterization of XPS, SEM, TEM, FTIR, and BET analysis showed that the CS-LDH had a high specific surface area and contained many different functional groups. The adsorption capacity of the CS-LDH was evaluated by adsorbing Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ as representative heavy metals. Batch adsorption method was used to investigate the effects of the amount of adsorbent, pH of the initial solution, and contact time. We also examined the adsorption kinetics, isotherms, and mechanisms. The capacity of the CS-LDH for Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ adsorption was higher than that of CS and the Mg-Al-LDH, and the isothermal data followed the Langmuir isotherm model. The adsorption equilibrium was quickly achieved and the kinetic data obeyed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The adsorption process was almost not affected by solution pH above 3. The CS-LDH and heavy metals interacted via the following mechanisms: precipitation, surface complexation, and isomorphic substitution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.049

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Deng, 2017, Competitive adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cu(II) onto chitosan-pyromellitic dianhydride modified biochar, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 506, 355, 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.07.069 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Lyu, F., Yu, H., Hou, T., Yan, L., Zhang, X., & Du, B.
Affiliations
University of Jinan (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Liangguo
Venue
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
539
Pages
184-193
ISSN
0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905174931
Cited by
162
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of China (21577048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
chitosan, Mg-Al layered double hydroxide, nanocomposite adsorbent, lead removal, cadmium removal, heavy metal adsorption, emulsion cross-linking, epichlorohydrin, Langmuir isotherm, pseudo-second-order kinetics, adsorption mechanism, surface complexation, isomorphous substitution, pH effect on adsorption
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Cadmium, Hydroxides, Lead, Magnesium, Particle Size, Solutions, Surface Properties, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Chitosan, Nanocomposites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review