Cited by 236Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and ApplicationsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Fe3O4-FeMoS4: Promise magnetite LDH-based adsorbent for simultaneous removal of Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cu (II) heavy metal ions

Behbahani, Elham Sadati, Dashtian, Kheibar, Ghaedi, Mehrorang·2021·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

There have always been numerous challenges to designing a cost-effectiveness, reusable and robust adsorbents for simultaneous heavy metal ion remediations from wastewaters. Herein, a novel kind of nanocomposite relying on the synergic impact of magnetic Fe 3 O 4, FeMoS 4-2, and magnesium-aluminum layered double hydroxide (MgAl-LDH) using loading the FeMoS 4-2 on protonated Fe 3 O 4 and adhered to the surface of Mg/Al-LDH (Fe 3 O 4/FeMoS 4/MgAl-LDH). The nanocage structures adsorbent was characterized via FT-IR, XRD, FE-SEM, EDX, and VSM techniques and demonstrated having an efficient adsorption capability to common cationic pollutants (Pb (II), Cd (II) and Cu (II) by batch experiments. Disparate chief parameters affecting adsorption performance, including Fe 3 O 4/FeMoS 4/MgAl-LDH mass, metal ion concentrations, solution pH, and contact time were considered and optimized through central composite design (CCD) in detail. Its supreme adsorption efficiency toward Pb (II), Cd (II), and Cu (II) accounted for 190.75, 140.50, and 110.25 mg g-1, respectively, which acquired by the Langmuir model under the parameter set at 60 min contact time, solution pH at 5, 0.03 g the Fe 3 O 4/FeMoS 4/MgAl-LDH and metal ion concentrations ranging from 10 to 300 mg L-1. Such enhancement stemmed from the coordinated complexes in the LDH interlayer region and electrostatic attraction between Fe 3 O 4/FeMoS 4/MgAl-LDH and metal ions. Furthermore, the adsorption conducts were more consistent with the pseudo-second-order model and the Langmuir isotherm model, respectively. Likewise, the features such as the superior regeneration and reusability allow the Fe 3 O 4/FeMoS 4/MgAl-LDH nanocomposite to constitute as one of the promising materials for heavy metals remediation in wastewater.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124560

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 236

Authors
Behbahani, E. S., Dashtian, K., & Ghaedi, M.
Affiliations
Yasouj University (IR)
Corresponding author
Ghaedi, Mehrorang
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
410
Pages
124560
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3103958588
Cited by
236
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yasouj University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
magnetite, Mg-Al layered double hydroxide, heavy metal adsorption, lead removal, cadmium removal, copper removal, wastewater treatment, adsorbent regeneration, Langmuir isotherm, pseudo-second-order kinetics, central composite design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review