Cited by 145Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsIron oxide chemistry and applications

Interfacial engineering of heterostructured CoP/FeP nanoflakes as bifunctional electrocatalyts toward alkaline water splitting

Zhang, Yu, Li, Zhiyong, He, Siqi, Qiao, Yanxin, Yuan, Aihua, Wu, Jianchun, Zhou, Hu·2025·Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

Exploring highly-effective and nonprecious electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is urgent and challenging for developing the hydrogen economy. Interface engineering is a feasible approach for regulating the surface electronic distribution, thereby promoting the catalytic performance. Herein, the CoP/FeP heterostructure is fabricated via the oxidation and phosphating treatments of Fe-decorated Ni(OH) 2 nanoflakes. The hierarchically porous nanoflakes can expose more active species, while the formation of CoP/FeP heterojunctions have provided extra catalytic active sites and accelerated the charge transfer process. Theoretical calculations reveal that the interfacial electron coupling between CoP and FeP in the heterostructure has promoted the adsorption of intermediate species on catalytic sites, thereby decreasing the Gibbs free energy during the catalysis. The as-fabricated CoP/FeP catalyst requires small overpotentials of 190 mV and 280 mV to realize a current density of 10 mA cm -2 for alkaline HER and OER, respectively. The electrolytic cell with CoP/FeP as catalyst needs a voltage of 1.61 V to reach 10 mA cm -2 , and can run stably for over 25 h. The present study highlights a superiority of interfacial engineering to construct efficient electrocatalysts for water electrolysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.10.084

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Li, Z., He, S., Qiao, Y., Yuan, A., Wu, J., & Zhou, H.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Hu
Venue
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
679
Issue
Pt B
Pages
20-29
ISSN
0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403524379
Cited by
145
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 3
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (KYCX24_4111)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22279047)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Keywords
interface engineering, bifunctional electrocatalysts, alkaline water splitting, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, interfacial electron transfer, non-precious metal electrocatalysts, water electrolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review