Cited by 22Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationSkin Diseases and Diabetes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patients’ Journey Toward Engagement in Self-Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Adults With Types 1 and 2 Diabetes: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study

Costa, Idevania G., Tregunno, Deborah, Camargo-Plazas, Pilar·2021·Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

Objectives Our aim in this study was to develop the first theory that could explain the processes of engagement in self-management for adults with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Methods A constructivist grounded theory, informed by Charmaz, and symbolic interactionism were used to guide the study design. Results The findings from 30 study participants with active DFU draw attention to the complexity that exists for individuals seeking to balance life and manage their diabetes and DFU. The categories/phases and set of associated concepts comprise the theory known as The Journey Toward Engagement in Self-Management. This theory consists of 5 phases: 1) perception of illness, 2) noticing foot changes, 3) realizing seriousness, 4) beginning to learn about self-management and 5) engaging in self-management. The theory's phases describe the processes of engagement in self-management from participants' unique experience of living and managing DFU. Conclusions The results show the pathways taken by participants to learn about self-management practices and how engagement in day-to-day management of DFU occurred. Engagement in self-management of an active DFU is complex and a developmental process that differs from participant to participant and changes over time. Although most participants preferred to take a more passive role in self-management of DFU (seen in phase 4), others demonstrated confidence to advance to another stage (seen in phase 5). At the advanced stage, they took an active role in self-management by expressing their needs and preferences, and were involved in their own care and decision-making related to treatment options.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.05.017

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berhe, 2012, Diabetes self care practices and associated factors among type 2 diabetic patients in Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia---A cross sectional study, Int J Pharm Sci, 3, 4219
  2. Costa, 2017, Re-thinking self-care management for individuals with diabetic foot ulcers, Wounds Int J, 8, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Costa, I. G., Tregunno, D., & Camargo-Plazas, P.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
108-113.e2
ISSN
1499-2671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035742644
Cited by
22
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Frailty Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, self-management, patient engagement, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, patient experience, illness perception, foot self-examination, patient decision-making, patient-centered care, theory development
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Canada, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Diabetic Foot, Disease Progression, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review