Cited by 9Ocular Oncology and TreatmentsOcular Disorders and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

Referral patterns of intraocular tumour patients to a dedicated Canadian ocular oncology department

Law, Christine, Krema, Hatem, Simpson, E. Rand·2012·Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective Intraocular tumours are uncommon lesions requiring comprehensive management at tertiary referral centers. This study analyzes referral patterns of intraocular tumours, accuracy of referral diagnosis, and modes of treatment provided for patients at a dedicated Canadian Ocular Oncology Department.Design Retrospective chart review.Participants A total of 1050 new patient referrals of intraocular tumours to the department of Ocular Oncology at Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) between 2005 and 2008 inclusive.Methods Data collected for each patient included demographics, referral diagnosis, final diagnosis, and treatment provided or recommended. Home address postal codes were used to determine patients' geographical distance to PMH.Results Most patients originated from Ontario (81.5%) followed by Alberta (7.1%) with a median age of referral at 61 years old. The most common referral diagnoses were unknown diagnosis (47.6%), uveal melanoma (26.9%), and nevus (18.9%). After evaluation at PMH, uveal nevus was the most common final diagnosis (39.7%) followed by melanoma (39.2%). The referring physicians correctly diagnosed 48.5% of total melanomas. The proportion of melanoma diagnosis relative to total referrals by province ranged from 29.6% for Ontario to 100% for Quebec. Distance from the patient's address to PMH was <200 kilometres in 64.5% of patients and >1000 kilometres in 21.6% of patients.Conclusions The limited accuracy of referral diagnoses and increased proportion of melanoma referrals from greater distances demonstrates the need for increased knowledge in ocular oncology, improvement of eye cancer care facilities at the referral base, and/or the implementation of tele-ophthalmology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.047

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar referral patterns are observed in ocular oncology.

    “For example, up to 40% of patients referred to a neuro-ophthalmology subspecialty service are misdiagnosed,23 and similar referral patterns are observed in ocular oncology.24”

    From Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, C., Krema, H., & Simpson, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
254-261
ISSN
0008-4182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995762085
Cited by
9
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
intraocular tumors, uveal melanoma, referral patterns, teleophthalmology, ocular oncology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Child, Child, Preschool, Eye Neoplasms, Female, Geography, Hospitals, Special, Humans, Male, Medical Oncology, Middle Aged, Ophthalmology, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Oncology Service, Hospital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review