The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective
Kiefer, C. P., Del Río González, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2246 · Cited by 379
Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., & Lehmann, S. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-10-2014-0325 · Cited by 121
Building resilience: a self-sustainable community approach to the triple bottom line
Aguiñaga, E., Henriques, I., Scheel, C., & Scheel, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.094 · Cited by 66
Critical sustainability factors of regional SMEs; A case study of regional Australia
Artin, P. (2022) · Current Research in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100138 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillary, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 561-569
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057690435
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.08.006
- The paper
- Hillary, R. (2004). Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
