Cited by 121Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and Assessment

Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations

Open access
Chileshe, Nicholas, Rameezdeen, Raufdeen, Hosseini, M. Reza, Lehmann, Steffen·2015·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present a survey of the perceptions of the barriers to implementing reverse logistics (RL) practices in South Australian (SA) construction organisations. Despite the extensive research on forward logistics and RL, there is a paucity of studies that examine the barriers to implementing RL particularly within the Australian construction industry. This study builds on the ongoing research being undertaken by the authors, entitled “Designing for reverse logistics (DfRL) within the building life cycle: practices, drivers and barriers”, which is examining the best practices and drivers that could be used as a “road map” for developing appropriate solutions for the successful implementation of RL. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected by utilising a triangulated data collection approach, a literature review and 49 questionnaires. The review of the literature identified 16 barriers to implementing RL. The quantitative survey data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics with correlation analysis to examine the relationships between different pairs of variables comprising RL’s critical barriers. Findings – The following barriers were indicated as most significant: lack of incorporation of salvaged materials by designers; regulation restrictions to usage of recovered materials and components; potential legal liabilities; higher costs; and longer-time association with deconstructing buildings. The least ranked barriers were mostly…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/scm-10-2014-0325

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A series of studies in Australia employs mixed methodologies such as interviews and questionnaire surveys and targets various stakeholders to investigate drivers and barriers to reverse logistics in the South Australian construction context.

    “For instance, a series of studies performed in Australia employs mixed methodologies such as interviews and questionnaire surveys and targets various stakeholders to investigate drivers and barriers to reverse logistics in the South Australian construction context (Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b, 2018; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015

  • Deconstruction is believed to be more labour intensive.

    “Although deconstruction can increase the reusability of the recovered building components (Addis, 2006; Munroe et al., 2006), it is believed to be more labour intensive (Chileshe et al., 2015; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015

  • Extra charges can yield a higher deconstruction cost when compared with demolition of the same building.

    “These extra charges can yield a higher deconstruction cost (when compared with the demolition of the same building) (Chileshe et al., 2015; Dantata et al., 2005; Dunant et al., 2018; Rose and Stegemann, 2018; Tingley et al., 2017; Yeung et al., 2015)”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015

  • Extra charges eventually increase the price of recovered components.

    “and eventually increase the price of the recovered components (Chileshe et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2016a; Dunant et al., 2018; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Shaurette, 2006; Tingley et al., 2017).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015

  • Sometimes it is required to purchase identified reused components early in the project to cope with uncertainty about the timely availability of the desired elements.

    “Sometimes it is required to purchase the identified reused components early in the project (Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008) to cope with uncertainty about the timely availability of the desired elements (Chileshe et al., 2015; Gorgolewski et al., 2008).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review

    Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works

    “Therefore, educating the stakeholders on the advantages of deconstruction and reuse, as identified by Chileshe et al. (2015) and Gorgolewski (2008), could be an effective measure to cope with some of the social resistance against reuse.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., & Lehmann, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
179-204
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040883935
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
reverse logistics, construction industry, implementation barriers, deconstruction, salvaged materials, building life cycle, regulatory constraints, legal liability, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review