Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations
Open accessAbstract
Purpose – This paper aims to present a survey of the perceptions of the barriers to implementing reverse logistics (RL) practices in South Australian (SA) construction organisations. Despite the extensive research on forward logistics and RL, there is a paucity of studies that examine the barriers to implementing RL particularly within the Australian construction industry. This study builds on the ongoing research being undertaken by the authors, entitled “Designing for reverse logistics (DfRL) within the building life cycle: practices, drivers and barriers”, which is examining the best practices and drivers that could be used as a “road map” for developing appropriate solutions for the successful implementation of RL. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected by utilising a triangulated data collection approach, a literature review and 49 questionnaires. The review of the literature identified 16 barriers to implementing RL. The quantitative survey data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics with correlation analysis to examine the relationships between different pairs of variables comprising RL’s critical barriers. Findings – The following barriers were indicated as most significant: lack of incorporation of salvaged materials by designers; regulation restrictions to usage of recovered materials and components; potential legal liabilities; higher costs; and longer-time association with deconstructing buildings. The least ranked barriers were mostly…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A series of studies in Australia employs mixed methodologies such as interviews and questionnaire surveys and targets various stakeholders to investigate drivers and barriers to reverse logistics in the South Australian construction context.
“For instance, a series of studies performed in Australia employs mixed methodologies such as interviews and questionnaire surveys and targets various stakeholders to investigate drivers and barriers to reverse logistics in the South Australian construction context (Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b, 2018; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Deconstruction is believed to be more labour intensive.
“Although deconstruction can increase the reusability of the recovered building components (Addis, 2006; Munroe et al., 2006), it is believed to be more labour intensive (Chileshe et al., 2015; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Extra charges can yield a higher deconstruction cost when compared with demolition of the same building.
“These extra charges can yield a higher deconstruction cost (when compared with the demolition of the same building) (Chileshe et al., 2015; Dantata et al., 2005; Dunant et al., 2018; Rose and Stegemann, 2018; Tingley et al., 2017; Yeung et al., 2015)”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Extra charges eventually increase the price of recovered components.
“and eventually increase the price of the recovered components (Chileshe et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2016a; Dunant et al., 2018; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Shaurette, 2006; Tingley et al., 2017).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Sometimes it is required to purchase identified reused components early in the project to cope with uncertainty about the timely availability of the desired elements.
“Sometimes it is required to purchase the identified reused components early in the project (Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008) to cope with uncertainty about the timely availability of the desired elements (Chileshe et al., 2015; Gorgolewski et al., 2008).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Higher deconstruction costs can hinder its application and might elevate financial risks associated with deconstruction and reuse.
“According to the literature, higher deconstruction costs can hinder its application (Chileshe et al., 2015; Dantata et al., 2005, 2018, Rose and Stegemann, 2018, Yeung et al., 2015, Tatiya et al., 2017; Tingley et al., 2017) and might elevate the financial risks associated with deconstruction and reuse (Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Construction sector's resistance against reuse stems from potential risks perceived by stakeholders during deconstruction or while using recovered building components.
“Another reason for this negative perception, and, at a larger scale, the construction sector’s resistance against reuse (Durão et al., 2014; Gorgolewski, 2008; Rameezdeen et al., 2016; Tingley et al., 2017), stems from the potential risks perceived by the stakeholders during deconstruction or while using the recovered building components (Chileshe et al., 2015; Dunant et al., 2017; Gorgolewski, 20”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Perceptions of clients, contractors and designers have a higher impact on successful integration of recovered components into a new building.
“Among the stakeholders, the perceptions of clients (Chileshe et al., 2015; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Dunant et al., 2017; Rose and Stegemann, 2018), contractors (Gorgolewski, 2008; Shaurette, 2006) and designers (Gorgolewski, 2008) have a higher impact on the successful integration of recovered components into a new building.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Educating stakeholders on the advantages of deconstruction and reuse could be an effective measure to cope with some social resistance against reuse.
“Therefore, educating the stakeholders on the advantages of deconstruction and reuse, as identified by Chileshe et al. (2015) and Gorgolewski (2008), could be an effective measure to cope with some of the social resistance against reuse.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2015
Cites
da Rocha, C. G., & Sattler, M. A. (2009) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“Therefore, educating the stakeholders on the advantages of deconstruction and reuse, as identified by Chileshe et al. (2015) and Gorgolewski (2008), could be an effective measure to cope with some of the social resistance against reuse.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., & Lehmann, S.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-03-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-204
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040883935
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- reverse logistics, construction industry, implementation barriers, deconstruction, salvaged materials, building life cycle, regulatory constraints, legal liability, South Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review