The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,572
Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework
Sethi, S. P. (1975) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41162149 · Cited by 1,036
McGuire, J. W. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,006
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry
Moore, G. (2001) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1012537016969 · Cited by 574
Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.26 · Cited by 339
An Introduction to Corporate Environmental Management: Striving for Sustainability
Schaltegger, S. (2003) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq.2003.14.4.541.4 · Cited by 301
Environmental reporting by the Fortune Global 250: exploring the influence of nationality and sector
Kolk, A., Walhain, S., & van de Wateringen, S. (2001) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:1<15::aid-bse275>3.0.co;2-y · Cited by 229
The UK supermarket industry: an analysis of corporate social and financial performance
Moore, G., & Robson, A. (2002) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00256 · Cited by 54
Cited by
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 · Cited by 1,775
An Analysis of Indicators Disclosed in Corporate Sustainability Reports
Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002 · Cited by 670
The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective
Diouf, D., & Boiral, O. (2017) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-04-2015-2044 · Cited by 429
Is integrated reporting determined by a country's legal system? An exploratory study
Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.006 · Cited by 388
Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management
Boiral, O. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2497-9 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Daub, C.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-85
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986466391
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013
- The paper
- Daub, C.-H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
