CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors

Konrad, Kornelia, Truffer, Bernhard, Voß, Jan-Peter·2008·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Raven, 2006, Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003), Energy Policy, 35, 2197, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Raven, 2007, Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector. The case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 1, 10.1080/09537320701403441 · DOI
  3. Geels, 2007, Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1411, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.07.008 · DOI
  4. Sawhney, 2006, Battle of systems: learning from erstwhile gas–electricity and telegraph–telephone battles, Prometheus, 24, 235, 10.1080/08109020600877477 · DOI
  5. Zimmerman, 1995, Toward a more democratic ethic of technological governance, Science, Technology and Human Values, 20, 86, 10.1177/016224399502000105 · DOI
  6. Geels, 2006, Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: a multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930), Technology in Society, 28, 445, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006 · DOI
  7. Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 · DOI
  8. Geels, 2005, Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) – a case study in multi-level perspective, Technology in Society, 27, 363, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008 · DOI
  9. Geels, 2006, The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation, Research Policy, 35, 1069, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.001 · DOI
  10. Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915 · DOI
  11. Markard, 2006, Innovation processes in large technical systems: market liberalization as a driver for radical change?, Research Policy, 35, 609, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008 · DOI
  12. Panebianco, 2006, Modelling socio-technical transformations in wastewater treatment – a methodological proposal, Technovation, 26, 1090, 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Konrad, K., Truffer, B., & Voß, J.-P.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
1190-1202
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014
Cited by
170
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014
The paper
Konrad, K., Truffer, B., & Voß, J.-P. (2008). Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014