Cited by 37Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

Beyond the disruption narrative: Varieties and ambiguities of energy system change

Open access
Winskel, Mark·2018·Energy Research & Social Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.046

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winskel, M.
Affiliations
UK Energy Research Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Winskel, Mark
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
37
Pages
232-237
ISSN
2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769823834
Cited by
37
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
UK Research Councils
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
energy system transformation, disruptive innovation, energy futures, energy transition, decarbonization, continuity and change, energy policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review