The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
Berkowitz, M. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1058233 · Cited by 10,549
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258888 · Cited by 7,838
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
Cited by
Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management
Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.091 · Cited by 521
Transitioning towards the bio-economy: Assessing the social dimension through a stakeholder lens
Falcone, P. M., González García, S., Imbert, E., Lijó, L., Moreira, M. T., Tani, A., Tartiu, V. E., & Morone, P. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1791 · Cited by 80
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71
Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?
Sevigné-Itoiz, E., Mwabonje, O., Panoutsou, C., & Woods, J. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0352 · Cited by 59
Kudratova, S., Huang, X., Kudratov, K., & Qudratov, S. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1846 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Matos, S., & Silvestre, B. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 61-73
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013679766
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 33.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.023
- The paper
- Matos, S., & Silvestre, B. S. (2013). Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
