The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive review
Shah, A. A., Hasan, F., Hameed, A., & Ahmed, S. (2008) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005 · Cited by 2,765
Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review
Al-Salem, S. M., Lettieri, P., & Baeyens, J. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004 · Cited by 2,404
Landfill mining and waste characterization: a strategy for remediation of contaminated areas
Hogland, W., Marques, M., & Nimmermark, S. (2004) · Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management · doi:10.1007/s10163-003-0110-x · Cited by 168
Material flow analysis of RDF-production processes
Rotter, V. S., Kost, T., Winkler, J., & Bilitewski, B. (2004) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.015 · Cited by 161
Energy content of municipal solid waste in Jordan and its potential utilization
Abu-Qudais, M., & Qdais, H. A. (2000) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/s0196-8904(99)00155-7 · Cited by 147
Quality assessment of mined MSW from an open dumpsite for recycling potential
Prechthai, T., Padmasri, M., & Visvanathan, C. (2008) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.002 · Cited by 143
Jiménez, E. I., & García, V. P. (1992) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/0960-8524(92)90012-m · Cited by 107
Klein, R., Baumann, T., Kahapka, E., & Nießner, R. (2001) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00188-1 · Cited by 94
Value from shredder waste: Ongoing limitations in the UK
Forton, O. T., Harder, M. K., & Moles, N. (2005) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.007 · Cited by 53
In situ distributions and characteristics of heavy metals in full-scale landfill layers
He, P., Xiao, Z., Shao, L., Yu, J., & Lee, D. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.033 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · Cited by 1,886
He, P., Chen, L., Shao, L., Zhang, H., & Lü, F. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.060 · Cited by 894
Azam, M., Jahromy, S. S., Raza, W., Raza, N., Lee, S. S., Kim, K.-H., & Winter, F. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105291 · Cited by 172
Datta, M., Somani, M., Ramana, G. V., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2021) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.051 · Cited by 94
Reddy, A. S., Pagano, A. G., Iyer, K. K. R., & Dave, T. N. (2026) · International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40891-026-00744-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Quaghebeur, M., Laenen, B., Geysen, D., Nielsen, P., Pontikes, Y., Van Gerven, T., & Spooren, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 72-83
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141077040
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.012
- The paper
- Quaghebeur, M., Laenen, B., Geysen, D., Nielsen, P., Pontikes, Y., Van Gerven, T., & Spooren, J. (2013). Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
