The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques
Bryson, J. M. (2004) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722 · Cited by 1,426
Cited by
Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases
Bocken, N. M. P., Schuit, C. S. C., & Kraaijenhagen, C. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001 · Cited by 510
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260
O'Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224 · Cited by 200
Horne, J., Recker, M., Michelfelder, I., Jay, J., & Kratzer, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118052 · Cited by 172
Magnusson, T., & Werner, V. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3081 · Cited by 80
Bank, N., Fichter, K., & Klofsten, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.123 · Cited by 76
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71
The sustainable start‐up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start‐ups
Leendertse, J., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Eveleens, C. P. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2667 · Cited by 64
Perramon, J., Bagur-Femenías, L., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., & Llach, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142279 · Cited by 48
Critical sustainability factors of regional SMEs; A case study of regional Australia
Artin, P. (2022) · Current Research in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100138 · Cited by 18
Hybrid Bottom Line: Another perspective on the sustainability of organizations
Jerónimo Silvestre, W., Antunes, P., & Filho, W. L. (2014) · International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology · doi:10.1080/13504509.2014.959580 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 20-28
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001011781
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
