The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustainable textile production: a case study from a woven fabric manufacturing mill in Turkey
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the applicability of different sustainable production measures and demonstrate environmental and economical benefits in a woven fabric manufacturing mill in Bursa, Turkey. As a result of an Environmental Performance Evaluation (EPE) evaluation, five sustainable production applications were proposed and implemented to decrease water consumption, wastewater generation, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and salt (NaCl) consumption in the company. As a result, the total water consumption of the company was decreased 40.2% while wastewater generation was reduced by 43.4%. Total energy consumption and associated CO2 emissions of the company were decreased 17.1 and 13.5%, respectively. While total salt (NaCl) consumption was decreased by 46.0%. The payback period was calculated as approximately 1.5 months. This study can be regarded as a successful example of adoption of “Communique of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control in Textile Sector” with tangible economical and environmental achievements in the Turkish textile industry. The results of the study show that the wide-spread uptake of proposed sustainable production measures would generate a tremendous change in the Turkish textile industry without a need for heavy investments in technology. Moreover the economic returns would help Turkish textile industry to sustain its competitive position in the global textile market which faces a pressing challenge of low cost, high quality and environmentally benign production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Al-Jabri, H., Das, P., Khan, S., Thaher, M., & AbdulQuadir, M. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13010027 · Cited by 270
Cleaner Production in the textile industry and its relationship to sustainable development goals
de Oliveira Neto, G. C., Ferreira Correia, J. M., Silva, P. C., de Oliveira Sanches, A. G., & Lucato, W. C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.334 · Cited by 267
A critical review of the current water conservation practices in textile wet processing
Hussain, T., & Wahab, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.051 · Cited by 264
Hu, E., Shang, S., Tao, X.-M., Jiang, S., & Chiu, K.-L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.194 · Cited by 111
Rosa, J. M., Fileti, A. M. F., Tambourgi, E. B., & Santana, J. C. C. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.043 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkaya, E., & Demirer, G. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 595-603
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000408495
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable textile production: a case study from a woven fabric manufacturing mill in Turkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.008
- The paper
- Alkaya, E., & Demirer, G. N. (2014). Sustainable textile production: a case study from a woven fabric manufacturing mill in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.