The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of the current water conservation practices in textile wet processing
Abstract
Abstract Textile wet processing industry accounts for a huge proportion in the consumption and pollution of fresh water. Increasing consumer awareness on the environmental issues, tightening environmental legislations on the effluents generated by textile industry and water scarcity in different areas of the world have compelled textile industry to review, restructure and reduce its water consumption and the associated effluent hazards. In this paper, a critical review of the latest water conservation practices in the textile wet processing industry is presented. Water conservation efforts in different segments of the textile industry have been classified into five major categories. These include waste water treatment and reuse, machine innovations, process innovations, chemical innovations, advanced water analysis and water saving tools. Waterless dyeing using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and the use of low liquor ratio machines in textile wet processing are two very promising approaches for water conservation. But waterless dyeing needs further working to dye natural fibers in a reliable way. The huge capital investment required for SC-CO2 dyeing machines and conversion of conventional dye houses into low liquor ratio dye houses is also a major hindrance in the way of the wider acceptance of these techniques in the industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robinson, T., McMullan, G., Marchant, R., & Nigam, P. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00080-8 · Cited by 4,422
Oller, I., Malato, S., & Sánchez-Pérez, J. A. (2011) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061 · Cited by 2,406
Verma, A. K., Dash, R. R., & Bhunia, P. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 · Cited by 1,996
Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard
Kant, R. (2012) · Natural Science · doi:10.4236/ns.2012.41004 · Cited by 1,545
Microbial decolorization of textile-dyecontaining effluents: A review
Banat, I. M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., & Marchant, R. (1996) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(96)00113-7 · Cited by 1,502
Industrial enzyme applications
Kirk, O., Borchert, T. V., & Fuglsang, C. C. (2002) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00328-2 · Cited by 1,461
Vandevivere, P. C., Bianchi, R., & Verstraete, W. (1998) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::aid-jctb905>3.0.co;2-# · Cited by 1,050
Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century
Singh, R., Kumar, M., Mittal, A., & Mehta, P. K. (2016) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8 · Cited by 904
A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution
Khatri, A., Peerzada, M. H., Mohsin, M., & White, M. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 · Cited by 613
Characterisation of textile wastewaters ‐ a review
Correia, V. M., Stephenson, T., & Judd, S. J. (1994) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593339409385500 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Jahan, N., Tahmid, M., Shoronika, A. Z., Fariha, A., Roy, H., Pervez, M. N., Cai, Y., Naddeo, V., & Islam, M. S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142215398 · Cited by 143
Brito, I., Ferreira, S. M., & Santos, L. (2023) · Cosmetics · doi:10.3390/cosmetics10050140 · Cited by 15
Application of dye saturated clay adsorbent from dyeing wastewater as textile printing pigment
Rahimi, A. A., & Alihosseini, F. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.7183 · Cited by 13
Microwave-Reactor-Based Preparation of Red Iron Oxide Pigment from Waste Iron Sulfate
Splinter, K., Moszyński, D., & Lendzion-Bieluń, Z. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16083242 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussain, T., & Wahab, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 198
- Pages
- 806-819
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2847243166
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 17.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of the current water conservation practices in textile wet processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.051
- The paper
- Hussain, T., & Wahab, A. (2018). A critical review of the current water conservation practices in textile wet processing. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
