The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mode of circular economy in China's iron and steel industry: a case study in Wu'an city
Open accessAbstract
The iron and steel industry is a resource and energy intensive industry; in China, it also produces high pollution and emissions. Therefore, the iron and steel industry in China is inevitably developing a circular economy. This study focuses on private steel enterprises in China, whose annual pig iron output comprised more than half the total national output of 2010. Firstly, this study provides a historical perspective on the circular economy mode inherent in this sector, explains how significant reductions in energy consumption and pollutant emissions have been realized, and offers guidance for future initiatives. Then, the states of various circular economy development pathways for the Wu'an Iron and Steel Group (WISG), a typical private steel enterprise based in North China, are examined as a case study. To assess the circular economy of the WISG, an evaluation system used by this industry to estimate circular economy performance-that is, a system that uses circular economy efficiency composite index (CEECI) values-is introduced. Our results indicate that the CEECI values of the WISG were 0.72 and 0.89 in 2007 and 2010, respectively, which were lower than those of the national large and medium-sized key iron and steel enterprises (NKISE) in China. Although the implementation of a circular economy has greatly enhanced the WISG with respect to reducing pollution, further measures, such as improving the utilization rates of coke oven gas, converter gas, and converter slag, as well as reducing sulfur dioxide emissions, are urgently required. The integration of these measures into the current circumstances is not only possible in the future but is inevitably essential to achieving sustainable development in the steel industry. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Circular economy as an essentially contested concept
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · Cited by 1,568
Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 · Cited by 1,522
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, S.-H., Wen, Z.-G., Chen, J.-N., & Wen, Z.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 505-512
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982023675
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mode of circular economy in China's iron and steel industry: a case study in Wu'an city. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.008
- The paper
- Ma, S.-H., Wen, Z.-G., Chen, J.-N., & Wen, Z.-C. (2014). Mode of circular economy in China's iron and steel industry: a case study in Wu'an city. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.