The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Since many years, companies are trying to cope with impressive technological growth rates, severe environmental issues and even more restrictive national and international directives. However, innovative Business Models (BMs) and industrial strategies adequate to this new context are still either under development or implementation. To this aim, the article proposes a systematic literature review on existing Circular Business Models (CBMs) and their classification methods, by selecting the most promising ones. A total amount of 283 articles related with CBMs has been assessed into detail, by identifying: 5 archetypes, 9 classification methods, 5 adoption-oriented challenges, 4 decision-support tools and 3 additional research areas. Key findings demonstrate that: i) Product-Service Systems (PSSs)-oriented and Reuse, Remanufacturing and Recycling (3R)-based CBMs are the most common archetypes, ii) Business Model Canvas is the most diffused classification framework, iii) sustainability and company-based challenges are the most discussed by the experts and iv) sustainability check-oriented is the most common type of decision-support tools. These (and others) results could support both companies, researchers and governments in updating the current knowledge on CBMs and make them adoptable for practitioners from different industrial contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 · Cited by 4,366
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010) · IRIS · Cited by 2,923
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment
Segerson, K., Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1991) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146419 · Cited by 2,308
The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. E. (2009) · Cited by 2,123
(2009) · Cited by 2,062
Cited by
Circular business models: a review
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · Cited by 1,089
Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead
Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2554 · Cited by 588
Blomsma, F., Pieroni, M., Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D. C. A., Hildenbrand, J., Kristinsdottir, A. R., Kristoffersen, E., Shahbazi, S., Nielsen, K. D., Jönbrink, A.-K., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118271 · Cited by 336
Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review
Charef, R., Morel, J.-C., & Rakhshan, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132312989 · Cited by 188
Circular economy business model innovation: sectorial patterns within manufacturing companies
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124921 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 236
- Pages
- 117696
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962028013
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 133
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696
- The paper
- Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2019). Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.