Toward sustainability with the coordinated freight distribution of municipal goods
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The development of knowledge and organizational capacity is not hindered by potential silo structures.
“In this way, the development of knowledge and organizational capacity is not hindered by potential silo structures (Björklund and Gustafsson, 2015).”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Björklund and Gustafsson, 2015
The indexed abstract says knowledge can be integrated into municipal organisations and that increased knowledge transfer can help overcome weaknesses. It does not establish that potential silo structures do not hinder the development of knowledge or organisational capacity. No page number is provided for the passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement
Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
“- Individual information exchange, collaboration and strategic knowledge transfer paramount to effective processes Björklund and Gustafsson (2015)”
BackgroundInfluentialImplementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture
Lingegård, S., & von Oelreich, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2023.1136725 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“In this way, the development of knowledge and organizational capacity is not hindered by potential silo structures (Björklund and Gustafsson, 2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Björklund, M., & Gustafsson, S.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Björklund, Maria
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 194-204
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039865448
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- public procurement, sustainability management, knowledge dissemination, inter-organisational collaboration, Swedish municipalities, sustainable urban mobility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
