Cited by 319Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities

Open access
Boström, Magnus, Jönsson, Anna Maria, Lockie, Stewart, Mol, Arthur P.J., Oosterveer, Peter·2015·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supply chain transparency may remain limited in scope: unless coupled with other governmental and civil society strategies, reduced impact of one commodity may be cancelled out by increased impact of another.

    “Second, by being concerned about sustainability of individual commodities, supply chain transparency may remain limited in scope: unless it is coupled with other governmental and civil society strategies, reduced impact of the supply chain of one commodity (e.g.sugarcane) may be cancelled out by increased impact of another (e.g.palm oil) (Larsen et al., 2008;Newton et al., 2013;Boström et al., 201”

    From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Boström et al., 2015

    The accepted-manuscript discussion says transparency is selective and does not automatically improve environmental quality. It also describes state regulation and NGO monitoring as complementary to private supply-chain standards. It does not say that reducing the impact of one commodity may be cancelled out by increased impacts from another, including the sugarcane and palm-oil example. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bair, J. (2009). Global Commodity Chains: Genealogy and Review. In J. Bair (Ed.) Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research. 1-34. Stanford: SUP.
  2. Boström, M. & Klintman, M. (2008). Eco-standards, Product Labelling, and Green Consumerism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Boström, M. (2014). Between Monitoring and Trust. Commitment to Extended Upstream Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2277-6 · DOI
  4. Brunsson, N. & B. Jacobsson and associates (2000). A world of Standards. Oxford University Press.
  5. Busch, L. (2000). The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies. 16:273- 283.
  6. Bush, S.R.; H. Toonen; P. Oosterveer & A.P.J. Mol (2013). The devils triangle of MSC certification: balancing credibility, accessibility and continuous improvement, Marine Policy 37 (1): 288-293
  7. Bush, S.R.; P. Oosterveer; M. Bailey & A.P.J. Mol (In this SV). Sustainable Chain Governance: A Review and Future Outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production Börjeson, N.; M. Gilek & M. Karlsson (In this SV).Knowledge challenges for responsible supply chain management of chemicals in textiles e as experienced by procuring organisations. Journal of Cleaner Production Chkanikova, O. & M. Lehner (In this SV). Private eco-brands and green market development: towards new forms of sustainability governance in the food retailing. Journal of Cleaner Production M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT De Bakker, F. & Nijhof, A. (2002) Responsible Chain Management: A Capability Assessment Framework. Business Strategy and the Environment. 11:63-75.
  8. Dietrich, U. & G. Auld (In this SV). Moving beyond commitments: creating durable change through the implementation of Asia Pulp and Paper's forest conservation policy. Journal of Cleaner Production Egels-Zandén, N. & H. Lindholm (In this SV). Do Codes of Conduct Improve Worker Rights in Supply Chains? A Study of Fair Wear Foundation. Journal of Cleaner Production Egels-Zandén, N.; K. Hulthén & G. Wulff (In this SV). Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: the case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Cleaner Production Frostenson, M. & F. Prenkert (In this SV). Sustainable supply chain management when focal firms are complex: a network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production
  9. Glin, L.C.; A.P.J. Mol; P. Oosterveer & S.D. Vodouhê (2012). Governing the Transnational Organic Cotton Network from Benin. Global Networks, 12 (3): 333-354
  10. Gold, S.; S. Seuring & P. Beske (2010). Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Inter- Organizational Resources: A literature review Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 230-245.
  11. Gupta, A. & M. Mason (Eds) (2014). Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: A Critical Perspective, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT
  12. Helin, S. & M. Babri (In this SV) Travelling with a Code of Ethics. A Contextual Study of a Swedish MNC Auditing a Chinese Supplier. Journal of Cleaner Production
  13. Locke, R. (2013). The Promise and Limits of Private Power. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  14. Lockie, S.; J.Travero & R. Tennent (In this SV). Private food standards, regulatory gaps and plantation agriculture: social and environmental (ir)responsibility in the Philippine export banana industry. Journal of Cleaner Production Loconto, A. (In this SV). Assembling governance: the role of standards in the Tanzanian tea industry. Journal of Cleaner Production
  15. Mayer, F. & G. Gereffi (2010). Regulation and Economic Globalization: Prospects and Limits of Private Governance, Business and Politics 12 (3): article 11 (doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1325) · DOI
  16. Miller, A.M.M. (2014). Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna, Wageningen: Wageningen University (PhD dissertation)
  17. Ponte, S.; P. Gibbon & Jakob Vestergaard (2011). Governing through standards. Origins, Drivers and Limitations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Said-Allsopp, M. & A. Tallontire (In this SV). Pathways to empowerment?: dynamics of women's participation in Global Value Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production
  19. Seuring, S. & S. Gold (2013). Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 56:1-6
  20. Seuring, S. & M. Muller (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production 16:1699-1710.
  21. Spaargaren, G.; A.P.J. Mol & F.H. Buttel (Eds) (2006). Governing Environmental Flows. Global Challenges to Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  22. Spaargaren, G. & A.P.J. Mol (2008). Greening Global Consumption: Redefining Politics and Authority. Global Environmental Change, 18 (3): 350-359
  23. Stolle, D. & M. Micheletti (2013). Political Consumerism. Global responsibility in action. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boström, M., Jönsson, A. M., Lockie, S., Mol, A. P. J., & Oosterveer, P.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Södertörn University (SE)
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Boström, Magnus
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
107
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974397568
Cited by
319
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
FWCI
33.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Swedish Research Council Formas (2012-6)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
responsible supply chains, global supply chains, sustainability governance, eco-labels, codes of conduct, auditing, product information systems, eco-branding, institutional building, reflexive learning, socio-environmental responsibility, cross-border governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review