The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable-responsible tourism discourse – Towards ‘responsustable’ tourism
Open accessAbstract
Despite several decades of academic and practical debate on tourism sustainability, its application in practice remains difficult. The dominant tourism discourse on sustainability (theory, seen as a concept) and responsibility (practice, understood as appropriate action) calls for a solid understanding of the process of how a responsible destination actually implements a sustainability agenda, which this paper aims to provide. In this context, we explore theoretical perspectives from political economics and behavioural economics to offer a well-reasoned integrated sustainability–responsibility model comprising three stages: Awareness, Agenda and Action. This Triple-A Model complements the sustainability indicators debate and provides advice on how to continuously implement the sustainability concept and move from market-value-led and environmentally laissez-faire tourism towards more environmental- and social-value-driven responsible tourism. In addition, this paper discusses the existing sustainability and responsibility nomenclatures and their use and contributes relevant conclusions on the current understanding of sustainability and responsibility in European and UNWTO practices. The term responsustable tourism is suggested to join two existing terms and demonstrate that the current understanding of responsible tourism behaviour is based on the concept of sustainable tourism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
Carroll, A. B. (1991) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g · Cited by 9,036
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
van de Ven, & Heslin, P. A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,921
Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion
van Marrewijk, M. (2013) · Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_32 · Cited by 1,702
Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion
van Marrewijk, M. (2003) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1023331212247 · Cited by 1,572
Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies
Poon, A. (1993) · doi:10.1079/9780851989501.0000 · Cited by 1,453
Sustainable Tourism Management
Swarbrooke, J. (1999) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851993140.0000 · Cited by 1,117
Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach
Inskeep, E. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,049
World conservation strategy. Living resource conservation for sustainable development.
Allen, R. (1980) · Cited by 1,014
Cited by
Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2020) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Mihalic, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 461-470
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989763974
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 36.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable-responsible tourism discourse – Towards ‘responsustable’ tourism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.062
- The paper
- Mihalic, T. (2016). Sustainable-responsible tourism discourse – Towards ‘responsustable’ tourism. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.