The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework
Open accessAbstract
Calls for a transformation towards more sustainable consumption and production (SCP) have been intensifying. As urban populations swell across the planet, cities are faced with increasing pressure on infrastructure, economic and ecological systems. Yet, with their high population densities and ubiquity of information and communication technologies, cities are becoming breeding grounds for a new, circular economy driven by emerging and long-standing sharing activities. This research provides a comprehensive view of SCP systems in cities by integrating and examining sharing economy activities in the context of two continuums, i.e. SCP and private/public orientation. Based on these two analytical dimensions, the paper evaluates and plots five groups of 18 sharing activities to create a Sharing Cities-SCP Typology comprised by five ideal types. Each of these five types represents a unique form of SCP activity, with the potential to directly impact SCP systems in the context of urban environments. By enabling diversity and hybridity in the SCP analysis, we allow for a theoretical expansion of SCP models and a new way of understanding how they may play out in cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748 · Cited by 1,716
Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0368 · Cited by 955
Cited by
Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research
Cheng, M. (2016) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003 · Cited by 888
Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0
Esmaeilian, B., Sarkis, J., Lewis, K., & Behdad, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064 · Cited by 855
Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling
Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.035 · Cited by 432
Self-citationCircular cities: mapping six cities in transition
Prendeville, S., Cherim, E., & Bocken, N. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002 · Cited by 395
Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review
Hossain, M. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, B., & Muñoz, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 134
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1486242516
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 71.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133
- The paper
- Cohen, B., & Muñoz, P. (2016). Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.