Cited by 1,716Management and Organizational StudiesBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchManagement Theory and Practice

Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling

Doty, D. Harold, Glick, William H.·1994·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Organizational typologies have proved to be a popular approach for thinking about organizational structures and strategies. Authors developing typologies, however, have been criticized for developing simplistic classification systems instead of theories. Contrary to these criticisms, we argue that typologies meet the criteria of a theory. When typologies are properly developed and fully specified, they are complex theories that can be subjected to rigorous empirical testing using the quantitative models we develop. We conclude by discussing the advantages of typological theories and presenting guidelines to improve the development of typologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258704

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Snow and Ketchen Jr. (2014) argued that well-developed typologies are more than just classification systems; rather, a typology articulates relationships among constructs and facilitates testable predictions.

    “Snow and Ketchen Jr. (2014) argued that well-developed typologies are more than just classification systems; rather, a typology articulates relationships among constructs and facilitates testable predictions (cf.Doty and Glick 1994).”

    From Designing conceptual articles: four approaches (2020) · cites this paper as Doty and Glick 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1994-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
230
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024380716
Cited by
1,716
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 67
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
organizational typology, theory development, typology development, classification systems, organizational structure, organizational strategy, theory testing, quantitative modeling, typological theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review