Cited by 163Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain ManagementService and Product Innovation

Challenges when evaluating Product/Service-Systems through Life Cycle Assessment

Open access
Kjaer, Louise Laumann, Pagoropoulos, Aris, Schmidt, Jannick H., McAloone, Tim C.·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PSS are business models that aim to provide incentives for more intensive product use, reuse of parts, decoupling value from the delivered physical product, and prolonging product life.

    “Product-service systems (PSS) are business models that aim to provide incentives for more intensive product use, reuse of parts, decoupling value from the delivered physical product (see, e.g., Tukker, 2015;Kjaer et al., 2016), and prolonging product life (Bocken et al., 2016).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Kjaer et al., 2016

    The returned passages from our copy are bibliographic and keyword entries labeled Abstract (no page number); they do not describe PSS incentives or decoupling value from a physical product. Searches for those concepts, including reuse and intensive use, found no passage that addresses the attributed claim. The separate claim about prolonging product life is cited to Bocken et al., not Kjaer et al. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kjaer, L. L., Pagoropoulos, A., Schmidt, J. H., & McAloone, T. C.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
120
Pages
95-104
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2330896274
Cited by
163
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
TORM Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
product-service systems, life cycle assessment, environmental performance evaluation, reference systems, functional units, system boundaries, resource efficiency, service-oriented business models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review