Cited by 159Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Standards in green public procurement – A framework to enhance innovation

Rainville, Anne·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 159

Authors
Rainville, A.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Rainville, Anne
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
167
Pages
1029-1037
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2537407746
Cited by
159
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
green public procurement, standardization, green innovation, innovation life cycle, pre-commercial procurement, innovation partnerships, demand-side interventions, tender design, product and service innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review