CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system

Rommel, Jens, Radtke, Jörg, von Jorck, Gerrit, Mey, Franziska, Yildiz, Özgür·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.114
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Adams, 2015, Local energy generation projects: assessing equity and risks, Local Environ., 20, 1473, 10.1080/13549839.2014.909797 · DOI
  2. Amate, 2013, Sustainable de-growth in agriculture and food: an agro-ecological perspective on Spain's agri-food system (year 2000), J. Clean. Prod., 38, 27, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.018 · DOI
  3. Andreoni, 2013, On the increase of social capital in degrowth economy, Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 72, 64, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.006 · DOI
  4. Asara, 2015, Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability, Sustain. Sci., 10, 375, 10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9 · DOI
  5. Bauwens, 2016, Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 93, 278, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bauwens, 2016, What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 136, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
  7. Becker, 2015, Transcending community energy: collective and politically motivated projects in renewable energy (CPE) across Europe, People Place Policy, 8, 180
  8. Bell, 2005, The “social gap” in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses, Environ. Polit., 14, 460, 10.1080/09644010500175833 · DOI
  9. Bell, 2013, Re-visiting the “social gap”: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy, Environ. Polit., 22, 115, 10.1080/09644016.2013.755793 · DOI
  10. Bharamappanavara, 2016, The effect of heterogeneity and freedom of participation on collective action in rural self-help groups: combining in-depth interviews with curve estimation, J. Mix. Methods Res., 10, 147, 10.1177/1558689814550876 · DOI
  11. Blanco, 2009, The economics of wind energy, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 13, 1372, 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.004 · DOI
  12. Bloemmen, 2015, Microeconomic degrowth: the case of community supported agriculture, Ecol. Econ., 112, 110, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.013 · DOI
  13. Borghi, 2007, Contextualising new modes of governance in activation policies, Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, 27, 353, 10.1108/01443330710822057 · DOI
  14. Cattaneo, 2012, Degrowth futures and democracy, Futures, 44, 515, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.012 · DOI
  15. Cattaneo, 2010, The experience of rurban squats in Collserola, Barcelona: what kind of degrowth?, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 581, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.010 · DOI
  16. Coleman, 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, Am. J. Sociol., 94, S95, 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dolan, 2015, Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy, J. Econ. Psychol., 47, 1, 10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003 · DOI
  18. Domènech, 2013, Degrowth initiatives in the urban water sector? A social multi-criteria evaluation of non-conventional water alternatives in Metropolitan Barcelona, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 44, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.020 · DOI
  19. Escobar, 2015, Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: a preliminary conversation, Sustain. Sci., 10, 451, 10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5 · DOI
  20. Funtowicz, 1993, Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 739, 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L · DOI
  21. Garcia, 2012, Degrowth, the past, the future, and the human nature, Futures, 44, 546, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.015 · DOI
  22. Gebauer, 2015, Qualität und Suffizienz in stabilitätsorientierten KMU. Unternehmensansätze für die Postwachstumsgesellschaft, UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 23, 33, 10.1007/s00550-015-0352-9 · DOI
  23. Grabs, 2016, Understanding role models for change: a multilevel analysis of success factors of grassroots initiatives for sustainable consumption, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 98, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.061 · DOI
  24. Gross, 2007, Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance, Energy Policy, 35, 2727, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013 · DOI
  25. Hall, 2013, Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies, Energy Policy, 58, 200, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009 · DOI
  26. Hansmann, 1999, Cooperative firms in theory and practice, Finn. J. Bus. Res., 4, 387
  27. Hatzl, 2016, Market-based vs. grassroots citizen participation initiatives in photovoltaics: a qualitative comparison of niche development, Futures, 78, 57, 10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.022 · DOI
  28. Hicks, 2011, Community-owned renewable energy (CRE): opportunities for rural Australia, Rural. Soc., 20, 244, 10.5172/rsj.20.3.244 · DOI
  29. Höfer, 2015, Internal governance and member investment behavior in energy cooperatives: an experimental approach, Util. Policy, 36, 52, 10.1016/j.jup.2015.09.003 · DOI
  30. Hoffman, 2005, Community energy: a social architecture for an alternative energy future, Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc., 25, 387, 10.1177/0270467605278880 · DOI
  31. Hoffman, 2010, From private lives to collective action: recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program, Energy Policy, 38, 7567, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.054 · DOI
  32. Holstenkamp, 2016, What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case, Energy Policy, 97, 111, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.010 · DOI
  33. Hoppe, 2015, Local governments supporting local energy initiatives: lessons from the best practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands), Sustainability, 7, 1900, 10.3390/su7021900 · DOI
  34. Huybrechts, 2014, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann. Public Coop. Econ., 85, 193, 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Johanisova, 2013, Social enterprises and non-market capitals: a path to Degrowth?, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 7, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.004 · DOI
  36. Johanisova, 2012, Economic democracy: a path for the future?, Futures, 44, 562, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.017 · DOI
  37. Johnson, 2015, Community energy and equity: the distributional implications of a transition to a decentralised electricity system, People Place Policy, 8, 149
  38. Kallis, 2011, In defence of degrowth, Ecol. Econ., 70, 873, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007 · DOI
  39. Kerschner, 2010, Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 544, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019 · DOI
  40. Kerschner, 2016, A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice, Ecol. Econ., 126, 139, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.010 · DOI
  41. Kerschner, 2013, Economic vulnerability to peak oil, Glob. Environ. Change, 23, 1424, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.015 · DOI
  42. Kokkinidis, 2015, Spaces of possibilities: workers' self-management in Greece, Organization, 22, 847, 10.1177/1350508414521098 · DOI
  43. Künneke, 2015, Understanding values embedded in offshore wind energy systems: toward a purposeful institutional and technological design, Environ. Sci. Policy, 53, 118, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.013 · DOI
  44. Kunze, 2015, Collective ownership in renewable energy and opportunities for sustainable degrowth, Sustain. Sci., 10, 425, 10.1007/s11625-015-0301-0 · DOI
  45. Lorek, 2013, Strong sustainable consumption governance – precondition for a Degrowth path?, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008 · DOI
  46. Lorek, 2014, Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies, J. Clean. Prod., 63, 33, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045 · DOI
  47. Middlemiss, 2010, Building capacity for low-carbon communities: the role of grassroots initiatives, Energy Policy, 38, 7559, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003 · DOI
  48. Müller, 2015, Energiegenossenschaften—Das Erfolgsmodell braucht neue Dynamik, GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc., 24, 96
  49. Nørgård, 2013, Happy degrowth through more amateur economy, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 61, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.006 · DOI
  50. Paldam, 2000, Social capital: one or many? Definition and measurement, J. Econ. Surv., 14, 629, 10.1111/1467-6419.00127 · DOI
  51. Parkhill, 2015, “We are a community [but] that takes a certain amount of energy”: exploring shared visions, social action, and resilience in place-based community-led energy initiatives, Environ. Sci. Policy, 53, 60, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014 · DOI
  52. Poteete, 2004, Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: the role of institutions in forest management, Dev. Change, 35, 435, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. Radtke, 2015, A closer look inside collaborative action: civic engagement and participation in community energy initiatives, People Place Policy, 8, 235
  54. Rockström, 2009, A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461, 472, 10.1038/461472a · DOI · Paper page
  55. Rommel, 2016, Quality uncertainty and the market for renewable energy: evidence from German consumers, Renew. Energy, 94, 106, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.049 · DOI
  56. Ruddat, 2015, Wie die Bürgerinnen und Bürger ihre Rolle bei der Energiewende sehen, Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfr., 65, 121
  57. Sagebiel, 2014, Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online choice experiment in Germany, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2, 90, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.003 · DOI
  58. Santarius, 2016, Investigating meso-economic rebound effects: production-side effects and feedback loops between the micro and macro level, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 406, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.055 · DOI
  59. Schneider, 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 511, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014 · DOI
  60. Seidl, 2012, Abhängigkeit vom Wirtschaftswachstum als Hindernis für eine Politik innerhalb der limits to growth. Perspektiven für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft, GAIA, 21, 108, 10.14512/gaia.21.2.9 · DOI
  61. Seyfang, 2013, Growing green money? Mapping community currencies for sustainable development, Ecol. Econ., 86, 65, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Seyfang, 2016, What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 28, 1, 10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603 · DOI
  63. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  64. Smith, 2016, Making the most of community energies: three perspectives on grassroots innovation, Environ. Plan. A, 48, 407, 10.1177/0308518X15597908 · DOI
  65. Sorman, 2013, The energetic metabolism of societies and the degrowth paradigm: analyzing biophysical constraints and realities, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 80, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.059 · DOI
  66. Sovacool, 2015, Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications, Appl. Energy, 142, 435, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002 · DOI
  67. Spash, 2011, Social ecological economics: understanding the past to see the future, Am. J. Econ. Soc., 70, 340, 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00777.x · DOI
  68. Strachan, 2015, Promoting community renewable energy in a corporate energy world, Sustain. Dev., 23, 96, 10.1002/sd.1576 · DOI
  69. Trainer, 2012, De-growth: do you realise what it means?, Futures, 44, 590, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.020 · DOI
  70. Victor, 2007, Managing without growth, Ecol. Econ., 61, 492, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.022 · DOI
  71. von Bock und Polach, 2015, Bioenergy as a socio-technical system: the nexus of rules, social capital and cooperation in the development of bioenergy villages in Germany, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 6, 128, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.02.003 · DOI
  72. von Jorck, 2015, Wir produzieren Zeitwohlstand. Postwachstumsunternehmen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung, Ökologisches Wirtsch., 4, 21, 10.14512/OEW300421 · DOI
  73. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Policy, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  74. Wells, 2016, Degrowth and techno-business model innovation: the case of Riversimple, J. Clean. Prod.
  75. Yildiz, 2013, Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland: Bestandsentwicklung und institutionenökonomische Analyse, Z. für das. gesamte Genoss., 63, 173
  76. Yildiz, 2014, Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation–the case of Germany, Renew. Energy, 68, 677, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 · DOI
  77. Yildiz, 2014, Energy cooperatives as a form of workplace democracy? A theoretical assessment, Econ. Soc., 16, 17
  78. Yildiz, 2015, Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 6, 59, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., & Yildiz, Ö.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
197
Pages
1746-1753
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.114
Cited by
96
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review