The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design
Open accessAbstract
With an increasing population, a growing middle class and increased resource use, our current ways of living and doing business are unsustainable. Next to the implementation of innovative technology, sustainable development based on innovative business models, better understating of customer needs and behavioural change are crucial. This research aims at combining principles from both sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation to develop more successful, radical and user-centred sustainable value propositions. Sustainable business model innovation entails developing value propositions that create value for multiple stakeholders at the same time, including customers, shareholders, suppliers and partners as well as the environment and society. User-driven innovation allows developing solutions that are meaningful for people and profitable for business by involving potential customers, users and/or other stakeholders in an experimental and iterative design process. The study adopts a research through design methodology, a qualitative research approach that uses design practice to inform research. To this end, a design project in the framework of the Climate-KIC (the largest European partnership addressing the challenge of climate change) was investigated. As a result, this paper proposes a process for sustainable value proposition design which adopts a thorough, dynamic and iterative perspective (talking to stakeholders, thinking about the problem, testing the product/service) that leads to an actual sustainable value proposition and to a superior problem-solution fit. In practice, managers are provided with an initial methodological framework for mapping and understanding the stakeholders in a broad sense (including and especially users), identifying their needs and interests, and progressively combining them into a more meaningful and enriching value proposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application
Dorst, K. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006 · Cited by 1,897
Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis
Charmaz, K. (2001) · Handbook of Interview Research · doi:10.4135/9781412973588.n39 · Cited by 327
Three ways to successfully innovate your business model
Giesen, E., Berman, S. J., Bell, R., & Blitz, A. (2007) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570710833732 · Cited by 323
Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback
SIERO, F. W., BAKKER, A. B., DEKKER, G. B., & VAN DEN BURG, M. T. C. (1996) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0019 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches
Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036 · Cited by 1,143
COVID-19 and Digitalization: The Great Acceleration
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011 · Cited by 947
“…firm and new ways to create and capture value for its stakeholders; it focuses primarily on finding new ways to generate revenues and define value propositions for customers, suppliers, and partners” (Casadesus, Masanell, & Zhu, 2013, p. 464; Baldassarre, Calabretta, Bocken, & Jaskiewicz, 2017).”
BackgroundBaldassarre, B., Schepers, M., Bocken, N., Cuppen, E., Korevaar, G., & Calabretta, G. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.091 · Cited by 361
Self-citationSustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models
Bocken, N., Boons, F., & Baldassarre, B. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159 · Cited by 315
Self-citationA Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools
Bocken, N., Strupeit, L., Whalen, K., & Nußholz, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11082210 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P., & Jaskiewicz, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 175-186
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2572187719
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 75.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081
- The paper
- Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P., & Jaskiewicz, T. (2017). Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.