Green public procurement implementation challenges in Australian public healthcare sector
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of political will and budget constraints pose obstacles to the allocation of resources and support for GPP initiatives.
“Lack of political will and budget constraints pose obstacles to the allocation of resources and support for GPP initiatives (Adjei-Bamfo & Maloreh-Nyamekye, 2021;Ahsan & Rahman, 2017).”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Ahsan & Rahman, 2017
The most significant issues in green procurement are the absence of green procurement law and support to green procurement from top management, government subsidies for green purchasing, and the lack of financial assistance.
“The most significant issues are the absence of green procurement law and support to green procurement from top management, government subsidies for green purchasing, and the lack of financial assistance in research conducted by [88].”
From The Impact of Electronic Procurement Adoption on Green Procurement towards Sustainable Supply Chain Performance-Evidence from Malaysian ISO Organizations (2022) · cites this paper as [88]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 95 · Cited by 160
- Authors
- Ahsan, K., & Rahman, S.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rahman, Shams
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 152
- Pages
- 181-197
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602105304
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 26.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- green public procurement, implementation barriers, public healthcare sector, senior management support, supplier collaboration, multi-criteria decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
