The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review
Open accessAbstract
The concept of sustainable manufacturing (SM) is becoming increasingly mature due to the focus on many of its research topics for a long time. This research has undoubtedly extended the body of knowledge, yet the numerous definitions of SM in prior art still indicate a lack of consensus on the true meaning of the concept. It is thus to be expected that these discrepancies will constrain further development and use of the SM concept in industrial practice. The goal of this paper is to analyze the different definitions of SM and identify the current understanding of what researchers mean by the concept. We use an inductive content analysis of definitions published from 1990 to 2016 in a variety of academic journals. A total of 189 articles including a manifest definition of SM and 89 original definitions were identified. Our analysis revealed that the most commonly used definition is the one proposed by U.S. Department of Commerce in 2008; 63% of the analyzed articles cite or slightly rephrase this definition, while 86% of the identified definitions are used in less than three articles. Although the majority of researchers seems to agree upon eleven sub-categories of SM, a wide range of issues (67 sub-categories) associated with SM indicates inconsistency in the general understanding of the concept. It is proposed that the findings in this study can serve as a foundation for the development of a common language for SM in both research field and industrial practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · Cited by 20,772
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
(2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1231/1/011001 · Cited by 10,357
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
Bengtsson, M. (2016) · NursingPlus Open · doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 · Cited by 4,616 · cited 1×
“Qualitative analysis presents data in the form of categories, enabling interpretation of the text (Bengtsson, 2016).”
MethodQualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions
Dahlsrud, A. (2008) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.132 · Cited by 4,092 · cited 2×
“, 2010), “green supply chain management” and “sustainable supply chain management” (Ahi and Searcy, 2013), and “corporate social responsibility” (Dahlsrud, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodA comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018 · Cited by 1,463
Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting
Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930410533704 · Cited by 1,253
Cited by
de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017 · Cited by 1,043
Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance
Guandalini, I. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003 · Cited by 445
Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Kumar, V. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215 · Cited by 422
A systematic review of the health co-benefits of urban climate change adaptation
Sharifi, A., Pathak, M., Joshi, C., & He, B.-J. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103190 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Moldavska, A., & Welo, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 744-755
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2743690190
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 45.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
- The paper
- Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2017). The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.