The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Varieties of business models for post-consumer recycling in China
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Following the waste recycling revolution in 2019, policy constraints, such as penalties for non-environmentally friendly behaviors, have transformed the relationship between informal recyclers and formal recyclers from competitive to collaborative, with a growing inclination towards formalization among informal recyclers 61 -63 .”
From Characterizing the polycentricity in waste governance: a comparative study on Shanghai, Tokyo, and Hong Kong (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Recyclables collection was market-driven”
From Untangling the critical success factors of the latest compulsory waste sorting initiative in Shanghai: The role of accountability governance (2024) · cites this paper as Tong et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“and fragmented recycling chains lacked government intervention (Tong et al., 2018).”
From Untangling the critical success factors of the latest compulsory waste sorting initiative in Shanghai: The role of accountability governance (2024) · cites this paper as Tong et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China
Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.016 · Cited by 283
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Boons, 2009, Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation, Ecol. Econ., 68, 1908, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.012 · DOI
- Cahill, 2010, Extended producer responsibility for packaging wastes and WEEE – a comparison of implementation and the role of local authorities across Europe, Waste Manag. Res., 29, 455, 10.1177/0734242X10379455 · DOI
- Chi, 2011, Informal electronic waste recycling: a sector review with special focus on China, Waste Manag., 31, 731, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Dubois, 2012, Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: the gap between economic theory and implementation, Waste Manag. Res., 30, 36, 10.1177/0734242X12453379 · DOI
- Flood, 2010, The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research, Syst. Pract. Action Res., 23, 269, 10.1007/s11213-010-9169-1 · DOI
- Govindan, 2017, A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 371, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126 · DOI
- Gu, 2016, The stability and profitability of the informal WEEE collector in developing countries: a case study of China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 107, 18, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.004 · DOI
- Guide, 2009, The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research, Oper. Res., 57, 10, 10.1287/opre.1080.0628 · DOI
- Hickle, 2014, An examination of governance within extended producer responsibility policy regimes in North America, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 92, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.007 · DOI
- Kissling, 2013, Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 80, 21, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.009 · DOI
- Lauridsen, 2010, Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy, Res. Policy, 39, 486, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.021 · DOI
- Liu, 2016, A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy, Omega, 59, 290, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.002 · DOI
- Massarutto, 2014, The long and winding road to resource efficiency – an interdisciplinary perspective on extended producer responsibility, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 85, 11, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.005 · DOI
- Porter, 2011, Creating shared value, Harv. Bus. Rev., 89, 62
- Schaltegger, 2016, Business models for sustainability: origins, present research, and future avenues, Organ. Environ., 29, 3, 10.1177/1086026615599806 · DOI
- Stubbs, 2008, Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”, Organ. Environ., 21, 103, 10.1177/1086026608318042 · DOI
- Tong, 2016, The rise and fall of a “waste city” in the construction of an “urban circular economic system”: the changing landscape of waste in Beijing, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 107, 10, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.003 · DOI
- Tong, 2013, From legal transplants to sustainable transition, J. Ind. Ecol., 17, 199, 10.1111/jiec.12013 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, The collection system for residential recyclables in communities in Haidian District, Beijing: a possible approach for China recycling, Waste Manag., 28, 1672, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.020 · DOI
- Zeng, 2017, Examining environmental management of e-waste: China's experience and lessons, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 72, 1076, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.015 · DOI
- Zhang, 2010, Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 1623
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12763 · Cited by 1,256
Otto, S., Kibbe, A., Henn, L., Hentschke, L., & Kaiser, F. G. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.293 · Cited by 77
Ramzan, S., Liu, C., Xu, Y., Munir, H., & Gupta, B. (2020) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-02-2020-0028 · Cited by 48
Xie, S., Gong, Y., Zhang, A., Liu, Y., & Li, C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141268 · Cited by 21
Hao, X., Dong, L., Qian, X., Benjamin, S., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, X., Ma, W., Li, J., Tong, X., et al. (2024) · npj Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s42949-024-00179-4 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tong, X., Tao, D., & Lifset, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 170
- Pages
- 665-673
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271548)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review