Cited by 77Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityMunicipal Solid Waste Management

The economy of E-waste collection at the individual level: a practice oriented approach of categorizing determinants of E-waste collection into behavioral costs and motivation

Open access
Otto, Siegmar, Kibbe, Alexandra, Henn, Laura, Hentschke, Liane, Kaiser, Florian G.·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

In order to foster e-waste recycling, it is necessary to identify the factors that affect consumers' recycling of e-waste and to determine the degree to which these factors influence recycling behavior. We propose that environmental motivation and behavioral costs are the two determinants of e-waste recycling, but only behavioral costs can be manipulated effectively in the short term. We conducted two field trails and tested the effects of direct approaches (i.e., structural improvements such as curbside collection and deposit containers) and indirect approaches (i.e., material and social enticements) that were designed to reduce behavioral costs. Results showed that the direct approach led to more than a 14-fold increase in e-waste recycling compared to the control condition. This effect increased even further in the second field trial in which behavioral costs were indirectly decreased through a combination of social enticements that addressed social norms, group identity, and social commitment. These findings show that expensive structural improvements (e.g., setting up deposit containers for e-waste) can be outperformed by e-waste collection campaigns that address social motives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.293

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hentschke, L., Kibbe, A., Otto, S., 2017. Geld in der Psychologie: vom Homo Oeco- nomicus zum Homo Sufficiensis [money and psychology: from homo oecono- micus to homo sufficiensis]. In: Peters, S. (Ed.), Geld: Interdisziplin€ are Sichtweisen. Springer, Wiesbaden, Germany, pp. 97e117 [Money: Interdisci- plinary Perspectives].
  2. Otto, S., Wittenberg, I., 2018a. Die Praxis der Energiewende, ihre zwei Determi- nanten aus psychologischer Sicht und wie man Rebound vermeiden kann. [The reality of the energy transition, its two psychological determinant and how to avoid rebound]. In: Bamberg, E., Schmitt, C.T. (Eds.), Psychologie und Nach- haltigkeit. Konzeptionelle Grundlagen, Anwendungsbeispiele und Zukunft- sperspektiven. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 191e201 [Psychology and Sustainability. Basic Concepts, Applications and Future Perspectives].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, S., Kibbe, A., Henn, L., Hentschke, L., & Kaiser, F. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Otto, Siegmar
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
204
Pages
33-40
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891539918
Cited by
77
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03PSZZF2C, 03ZZF82B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
e-waste recycling, behavioral costs, environmental motivation, curbside collection, social norms, group identity, social commitment, field trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review