Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Materially efficient construction provides benefits over the long-run even if it incurs additional upfront costs.
“However, just as in other areas of green building, materially efficient construction provides benefits over the long-run even if it incurs additional upfront costs (Zhang et al. 2018).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2018
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016 · see citing works
The Economics of Green Building
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00291 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A holistic sustainability overview of hemp as building and highway construction materials
Muhit, I. B., Omairey, E. L., & Pashakolaie, V. G. (2024) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111470 · Cited by 70
Teicher, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Wu, J., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Jing
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 2234-2245
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768852365
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71373006, 91546113, 71673156)
- Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
- Urban China Initiative
- China Scholarship Council
- Peking University-Lincoln Institute Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Keywords
- sustainable construction, economic feasibility, cost-benefit analysis, building life cycle, green building adoption, sustainable development, real estate developers, building occupants, intangible benefits, institutional arrangements, green building policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review